tidytlg
A tables-listings-graphs package that reached CRAN and then went quiet.
Comparison · Analytics
datapack vs r2rtf
A side-by-side editorial comparison of datapack and r2rtf — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
datapack vs r2rtf: at a glance
What is datapack?
The DataONE bundler learned to edit packages in 2017 and has coasted on that ever since
datapack assembles heterogeneous data files and metadata into a single transportable bundle, serialised as an OAI-ORE resource map and BagIt archive, for deposit into repositories like DataONE. Its functional surface settled with the 1.3.x line, which made assembled packages editable rather than write-once. Since then the releases have been sparse and defensive: SHA-256 as the default checksum in 1.4.0, BagIt spec conformance in 1.4.1, and a 2025 patch that states outright it contains no new features.
What is r2rtf?
The clinical-report table engine learned Chinese, then learned to leave RTF entirely
r2rtf builds the RTF tables, listings and figures that go into clinical study reports, and its recent releases have been about widening who and what it can serve rather than changing how tables are composed. The 1.2.0 release added internationalization — a SimSun font path for Chinese characters plus hyphenation control — and 1.3.0 followed with write_docx() and write_html(), turning the LibreOffice conversion the package had documented into exported functions.
datapack vs r2rtf: editorial side-by-side
datapack
0.0ANALYTICS
The DataONE bundler learned to edit packages in 2017 and has coasted on that ever since
◆ Current state
datapack assembles heterogeneous data files and metadata into a single transportable bundle, serialised as an OAI-ORE resource map and BagIt archive, for deposit into repositories like DataONE. Its functional surface settled with the 1.3.x line, which made assembled packages editable rather than write-once. Since then the releases have been sparse and defensive: SHA-256 as the default checksum in 1.4.0, BagIt spec conformance in 1.4.1, and a 2025 patch that states outright it contains no new features.
◆ Where it's heading
The arc runs from assembly to correctness of the resulting archive. Later releases keep tightening the metadata the resource map must carry — dc:creator always present, dcterms:modified always updated, the package correctly flagged as modified after any access-policy change — because a bundle whose provenance record is subtly wrong is worse than one that fails outright. The three-year gap between 1.4.1 and 1.4.2, and the latter's CRAN-note content, place this package firmly in preservation.
◆ Prediction
Expect the next release, if any, to be another CRAN-compliance patch rather than functional work. The 1.4.2 note that it contains no new features is the clearest statement in the feed about where this package sits.
r2rtf
0.0ANALYTICS
The clinical-report table engine learned Chinese, then learned to leave RTF entirely
◆ Current state
r2rtf builds the RTF tables, listings and figures that go into clinical study reports, and its recent releases have been about widening who and what it can serve rather than changing how tables are composed. The 1.2.0 release added internationalization — a SimSun font path for Chinese characters plus hyphenation control — and 1.3.0 followed with write_docx() and write_html(), turning the LibreOffice conversion the package had documented into exported functions.
◆ Where it's heading
Two threads run through the window. One is output reach: RTF remains the composition target, but the artifacts that come out of it now include DOCX and HTML, and page numbering can be made table-relative across multi-page tables. The other is durability under a moving R and font stack — the ANSI/Unicode converter was rebuilt, the LaTeX mapping table generated from code rather than shipped as sysdata, unlist() usage fixed for R 4.5, and graphics-device leaks that produced stray Rplots.pdf closed off.
◆ Prediction
Having exported DOCX and HTML conversion, the likely next step is filling in what those formats lose relative to RTF — pagination and footnote fidelity are the obvious gaps. The i18n path currently covers Chinese only, so additional font families are the other plausible direction.
Alternatives to datapack and r2rtf
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either datapack or r2rtf.
Tplyr
Tplyr made clinical summary tables explain where every number came from.
rlistings
Clinical listings that keep inheriting their hardest problem — pagination — from the layer below.
hoardr
A cache-directory helper that has shipped nothing but CRAN-triggered patches for seven years.
gigs
gigs redesigned its whole conversion API for rOpenSci, then spent three releases getting the docs to build.
riem
A weather-data client that keeps rewriting its HTTP layer while slowly tightening its API.
See all datapack alternatives → · See all r2rtf alternatives →
Recent activity from datapack and r2rtf
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 7mo agor2rtfDOCX and HTML output become exported functions
- 10mo agodatapackCRAN documentation and CI cleanup
- 11mo agor2rtfChinese character support arrives via an i18n font path ⚡
- 1y agor2rtfText colour fixed for figures encoded into RTF
- 1y agor2rtfFootnote handling fixed for R 4.5.0
- 1y agor2rtfUnicode converter rebuilt and mapping table made inspectable
- 2y agor2rtfUTF-8 conversion fix and LibreOffice 7.6 support
- 4y agodatapackBagIt serialisation brought in line with the current spec
- 5y agodatapackSHA-256 becomes the default checksum algorithm
- 6y agodatapackResource map metadata guaranteed; removeRelationships() added
- 8y agodatapackupdateMetadata no longer drops package relationships
- 9y agodatapackAssembled data packages become editable in place ⚡
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between datapack and r2rtf?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. datapack and r2rtf are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is datapack better than r2rtf?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. datapack and r2rtf are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to datapack?
Top datapack alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "datapack alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/datapack for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to r2rtf?
Top r2rtf alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "r2rtf alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/r2rtf for the full list with editorial commentary on each.