tidytlg
A tables-listings-graphs package that reached CRAN and then went quiet.
Comparison · Analytics
crul vs taxizedb
A side-by-side editorial comparison of crul and taxizedb — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:ropensci
crul vs taxizedb: at a glance
What is crul?
crul took mocking back from webmockr and made it a property of the client itself
crul is the R6-based HTTP client underneath much of rOpenSci's package stack, covering synchronous requests, three flavours of async, pagination and retries. Its 1.6.0 release in July 2025 changed where test mocking lives: each client — HttpClient, Async, AsyncVaried — now takes a mocking parameter at initialisation or per method, and the standalone mock() function is deprecated. Mocking used to be something webmockr switched on from outside; it is now a setting on the client.
What is taxizedb?
Stopped trusting the cloud to prepare its taxonomic databases and does the conversion locally.
taxizedb queries taxonomic databases locally rather than through rate-limited web APIs, which is what makes it usable for millions of name lookups. Version 0.2.0 established the current design: every source stored as SQLite, no credentials or ports needed, plus name-to-ID mapping functions and ports of the core taxize verbs. The most recent release changes how those databases arrive — instead of downloading a preprocessed SQLite file from the cloud, db_download_*() now fetches raw data and converts it locally for every source, because the cloud path kept breaking.
crul vs taxizedb: editorial side-by-side
crul
0.0ANALYTICS
crul took mocking back from webmockr and made it a property of the client itself
◆ Current state
crul is the R6-based HTTP client underneath much of rOpenSci's package stack, covering synchronous requests, three flavours of async, pagination and retries. Its 1.6.0 release in July 2025 changed where test mocking lives: each client — HttpClient, Async, AsyncVaried — now takes a mocking parameter at initialisation or per method, and the standalone mock() function is deprecated. Mocking used to be something webmockr switched on from outside; it is now a setting on the client.
◆ Where it's heading
The async surface has been the growth area for years — retries reached Async, AsyncVaried, AsyncQueue and HttpRequest in 1.4, AsyncQueue gained the response accessors in 1.2, and 1.5.0 wired async requests up to webmockr. The 1.6.0 change reverses that direction of dependency, and it landed within a minute of webmockr's own release severing its tie to vcr. Read together, the rOpenSci HTTP stack is being deliberately untangled so each package can be used without the others.
◆ Prediction
With mock() deprecated rather than removed, the next major release is the likely point of deletion. Expect the remaining work to follow the same decoupling theme rather than adding request features.
taxizedb
0.0ANALYTICS
Stopped trusting the cloud to prepare its taxonomic databases and does the conversion locally.
◆ Current state
taxizedb queries taxonomic databases locally rather than through rate-limited web APIs, which is what makes it usable for millions of name lookups. Version 0.2.0 established the current design: every source stored as SQLite, no credentials or ports needed, plus name-to-ID mapping functions and ports of the core taxize verbs. The most recent release changes how those databases arrive — instead of downloading a preprocessed SQLite file from the cloud, db_download_*() now fetches raw data and converts it locally for every source, because the cloud path kept breaking.
◆ Where it's heading
The package is trading convenience for independence. Each release removes another thing that has to be working elsewhere for the package to function: hosted database preparation is gone, and where a provider disappears the package documents it rather than pretending otherwise — db_download_tpl() is now defunct because The Plant List no longer exists, though previously downloaded copies still query fine. Release cadence is slow, with multi-year gaps and a maintainer handover in 2023.
◆ Prediction
Expect further releases to track data sources appearing and disappearing rather than adding features, since that has driven every recent change. Local conversion also shifts cost onto users, so build time and memory for the larger sources are the plausible next thing to need attention.
Alternatives to crul and taxizedb
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either crul or taxizedb.
Tplyr
Tplyr made clinical summary tables explain where every number came from.
rlistings
Clinical listings that keep inheriting their hardest problem — pagination — from the layer below.
hoardr
A cache-directory helper that has shipped nothing but CRAN-triggered patches for seven years.
gigs
gigs redesigned its whole conversion API for rOpenSci, then spent three releases getting the docs to build.
riem
A weather-data client that keeps rewriting its HTTP layer while slowly tightening its API.
See all crul alternatives → · See all taxizedb alternatives →
Recent activity from crul and taxizedb
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 9mo agotaxizedbDatabases now built locally from raw data, not the cloud
- 1y agocrulMocking becomes a client parameter, independent of webmockr ⚡
- 2y agocrulAsync requests become mockable through webmockr
- 2y agocrulDocumentation fixes and test helper tweak
- 3y agocrulHTTP retries reach the async classes
- 3y agotaxizedbPatch release for a maintainer change
- 3y agocrulClearer error for mismatched urls and disk lengths
- 4y agocrulAsyncQueue gains response accessors; results print as a summary
- 5y agotaxizedbtaxa_at() retrieves ancestors at a named rank
- 5y agotaxizedbFixes failing tests
- 6y agotaxizedbSQLite everywhere, three new sources, taxize verbs ported ⚡
- 9y agotaxizedbTracks the dplyr split that introduced dbplyr
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between crul and taxizedb?
Both compete on the same themes — ropensci — within Analytics. crul and taxizedb are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is crul better than taxizedb?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. crul and taxizedb are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to crul?
Top crul alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "crul alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/crul for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to taxizedb?
Top taxizedb alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "taxizedb alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/taxizedb for the full list with editorial commentary on each.