← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

crul vs rtflite

A side-by-side editorial comparison of crul and rtflite — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

crul vs rtflite: at a glance

Featurecrulrtflite
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themeshttp-client, async, mocking, ropensciclinical-reporting, python, document-conversion, rtf
Last editorial update1h ago2h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is crul?

crul took mocking back from webmockr and made it a property of the client itself

crul is the R6-based HTTP client underneath much of rOpenSci's package stack, covering synchronous requests, three flavours of async, pagination and retries. Its 1.6.0 release in July 2025 changed where test mocking lives: each client — HttpClient, Async, AsyncVaried — now takes a mocking parameter at initialisation or per method, and the standalone mock() function is deprecated. Mocking used to be something webmockr switched on from outside; it is now a setting on the client.

Read the full crul trajectory →

What is rtflite?

rtflite stopped being an RTF writer and became the conversion layer for clinical table output.

rtflite generates the RTF tables clinical study reports are built from, a Python answer to the R tooling that has owned this niche. Over one dense month it grew a full export path: DOCX in 2.2.0, DOCX concatenation in 2.3.0, a configurable LibreOffice converter in 2.4.0, and HTML plus PDF in 2.5.0. The three releases since have been documentation, test infrastructure, and typing work — the feature push has stopped and consolidation has started.

Read the full rtflite trajectory →

crul vs rtflite: editorial side-by-side

C
crul
ANALYTICS
0.0

crul took mocking back from webmockr and made it a property of the client itself

◆ Current state

crul is the R6-based HTTP client underneath much of rOpenSci's package stack, covering synchronous requests, three flavours of async, pagination and retries. Its 1.6.0 release in July 2025 changed where test mocking lives: each client — HttpClient, Async, AsyncVaried — now takes a mocking parameter at initialisation or per method, and the standalone mock() function is deprecated. Mocking used to be something webmockr switched on from outside; it is now a setting on the client.

◆ Where it's heading

The async surface has been the growth area for years — retries reached Async, AsyncVaried, AsyncQueue and HttpRequest in 1.4, AsyncQueue gained the response accessors in 1.2, and 1.5.0 wired async requests up to webmockr. The 1.6.0 change reverses that direction of dependency, and it landed within a minute of webmockr's own release severing its tie to vcr. Read together, the rOpenSci HTTP stack is being deliberately untangled so each package can be used without the others.

◆ Prediction

With mock() deprecated rather than removed, the next major release is the likely point of deletion. Expect the remaining work to follow the same decoupling theme rather than adding request features.

R
rtflite
ANALYTICS
0.0

rtflite stopped being an RTF writer and became the conversion layer for clinical table output.

◆ Current state

rtflite generates the RTF tables clinical study reports are built from, a Python answer to the R tooling that has owned this niche. Over one dense month it grew a full export path: DOCX in 2.2.0, DOCX concatenation in 2.3.0, a configurable LibreOffice converter in 2.4.0, and HTML plus PDF in 2.5.0. The three releases since have been documentation, test infrastructure, and typing work — the feature push has stopped and consolidation has started.

◆ Where it's heading

Every format addition routes through the same LibreOffice converter rather than a per-format implementation, and 2.4.0's breaking change made that converter an injectable object you can configure and reuse. That is the shape of a package expecting to run inside a pipeline that produces hundreds of tables, not one that converts a document at a time. The recent quiet — snapshot tests moved onto `pytest-r-snapshot`, docs migrated, pandas and pyarrow dropped from dev dependencies — reads as work to stay dependency-light while the surface stabilizes.

◆ Prediction

With the export matrix filled in and three consecutive infrastructure-only releases, the next substantive change is most likely on the input side — table construction and pagination — since `page_by` and `subline_by` are the only feature area still generating bug reports in these notes.

Alternatives to crul and rtflite

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either crul or rtflite.

See all crul alternatives → · See all rtflite alternatives →

Recent activity from crul and rtflite

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 4mo agortfliteMulti-section body typing tightened; pandas dropped from dev deps
  2. 7mo agortfliteAPI reference renders Pydantic field metadata
  3. 7mo agortfliteDocumentation site migrated to Zensical
  4. 7mo agortfliteSnapshot tests moved to pytest-r-snapshot
  5. 7mo agortfliteHTML and PDF export complete the output matrix
  6. 7mo agortfliteLibreOffice conversion becomes an injectable converter object
  7. 1y agocrulMocking becomes a client parameter, independent of webmockr
  8. 2y agocrulAsync requests become mockable through webmockr
  9. 2y agocrulDocumentation fixes and test helper tweak
  10. 3y agocrulHTTP retries reach the async classes
  11. 3y agocrulClearer error for mismatched urls and disk lengths
  12. 4y agocrulAsyncQueue gains response accessors; results print as a summary

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between crul and rtflite?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. crul and rtflite are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is crul better than rtflite?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. crul and rtflite are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to crul?

Top crul alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "crul alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/crul for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to rtflite?

Top rtflite alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rtflite alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rtflite for the full list with editorial commentary on each.