tidytlg
A tables-listings-graphs package that reached CRAN and then went quiet.
Comparison · Analytics
crul vs refsplitr
A side-by-side editorial comparison of crul and refsplitr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:ropensci
crul vs refsplitr: at a glance
What is crul?
crul took mocking back from webmockr and made it a property of the client itself
crul is the R6-based HTTP client underneath much of rOpenSci's package stack, covering synchronous requests, three flavours of async, pagination and retries. Its 1.6.0 release in July 2025 changed where test mocking lives: each client — HttpClient, Async, AsyncVaried — now takes a mocking parameter at initialisation or per method, and the standalone mock() function is deprecated. Mocking used to be something webmockr switched on from outside; it is now a setting on the client.
What is refsplitr?
Author disambiguation for bibliometrics, still grinding on the hard part: which names are the same person.
refsplitr parses Web of Science reference records into tidy data and tries to resolve which author strings belong to the same researcher, then georeferences their institutional addresses for network and map visualizations. The active work is squarely on the disambiguation core: 1.2.3 continues refining the author grouping algorithm and 1.2.1 adjusted ORCID ID matching. Earlier, 1.2.0 replaced the address parsing algorithm and changed the default georeferencing option for author institutions.
crul vs refsplitr: editorial side-by-side
crul
0.0ANALYTICS
crul took mocking back from webmockr and made it a property of the client itself
◆ Current state
crul is the R6-based HTTP client underneath much of rOpenSci's package stack, covering synchronous requests, three flavours of async, pagination and retries. Its 1.6.0 release in July 2025 changed where test mocking lives: each client — HttpClient, Async, AsyncVaried — now takes a mocking parameter at initialisation or per method, and the standalone mock() function is deprecated. Mocking used to be something webmockr switched on from outside; it is now a setting on the client.
◆ Where it's heading
The async surface has been the growth area for years — retries reached Async, AsyncVaried, AsyncQueue and HttpRequest in 1.4, AsyncQueue gained the response accessors in 1.2, and 1.5.0 wired async requests up to webmockr. The 1.6.0 change reverses that direction of dependency, and it landed within a minute of webmockr's own release severing its tie to vcr. Read together, the rOpenSci HTTP stack is being deliberately untangled so each package can be used without the others.
◆ Prediction
With mock() deprecated rather than removed, the next major release is the likely point of deletion. Expect the remaining work to follow the same decoupling theme rather than adding request features.
refsplitr
5.0ANALYTICS
Author disambiguation for bibliometrics, still grinding on the hard part: which names are the same person.
◆ Current state
refsplitr parses Web of Science reference records into tidy data and tries to resolve which author strings belong to the same researcher, then georeferences their institutional addresses for network and map visualizations. The active work is squarely on the disambiguation core: 1.2.3 continues refining the author grouping algorithm and 1.2.1 adjusted ORCID ID matching. Earlier, 1.2.0 replaced the address parsing algorithm and changed the default georeferencing option for author institutions.
◆ Where it's heading
Development has narrowed to the two operations that determine whether the output is usable — grouping author name variants and resolving addresses to coordinates. Everything else has been shedding: the maptools dependency was removed once that package was deprecated, and visualization changes are mostly about surfacing records the pipeline could not resolve, as with plot_net_country() returning fixable_countries so users can correct and rerun. Release notes are terse and defer to NEWS, so the changelog itself carries little detail.
◆ Prediction
Expect further incremental passes on author grouping and ORCID matching rather than new outputs; that algorithm is the package's accuracy ceiling and the last several releases have all touched it.
Alternatives to crul and refsplitr
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either crul or refsplitr.
Tplyr
Tplyr made clinical summary tables explain where every number came from.
rlistings
Clinical listings that keep inheriting their hardest problem — pagination — from the layer below.
hoardr
A cache-directory helper that has shipped nothing but CRAN-triggered patches for seven years.
gigs
gigs redesigned its whole conversion API for rOpenSci, then spent three releases getting the docs to build.
riem
A weather-data client that keeps rewriting its HTTP layer while slowly tightening its API.
See all crul alternatives → · See all refsplitr alternatives →
Recent activity from crul and refsplitr
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 28d agorefsplitrFurther refinement of the author grouping algorithm
- 29d agorefsplitrMinor fixes and ORCID matching edits
- 1y agocrulMocking becomes a client parameter, independent of webmockr ⚡
- 1y agorefsplitrNew address parsing algorithm, changed georeferencing default
- 2y agorefsplitrUnresolved countries surfaced, maptools dependency dropped
- 2y agocrulAsync requests become mockable through webmockr
- 2y agocrulDocumentation fixes and test helper tweak
- 3y agocrulHTTP retries reach the async classes
- 3y agocrulClearer error for mismatched urls and disk lengths
- 4y agocrulAsyncQueue gains response accessors; results print as a summary
- 6y agorefsplitrrOpenSci release v0.9.0
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between crul and refsplitr?
Both compete on the same themes — ropensci — within Analytics. refsplitr is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is crul better than refsplitr?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. refsplitr is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to crul?
Top crul alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "crul alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/crul for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to refsplitr?
Top refsplitr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "refsplitr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/refsplitr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.