r2rtf
The clinical-report table engine learned Chinese, then learned to leave RTF entirely
Comparison · Analytics
crul vs pkglite
A side-by-side editorial comparison of crul and pkglite — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
crul vs pkglite: at a glance
What is crul?
crul took mocking back from webmockr and made it a property of the client itself
crul is the R6-based HTTP client underneath much of rOpenSci's package stack, covering synchronous requests, three flavours of async, pagination and retries. Its 1.6.0 release in July 2025 changed where test mocking lives: each client — HttpClient, Async, AsyncVaried — now takes a mocking parameter at initialisation or per method, and the standalone mock() function is deprecated. Mocking used to be something webmockr switched on from outside; it is now a setting on the client.
What is pkglite?
pkglite's whole job is knowing which files in an R package are text — and it keeps getting better at guessing.
pkglite packs an R package into a single plain-text file and unpacks it again, the mechanism pharmaceutical submissions use to move source through systems that accept text but not archives. The API settled at 0.2.0 with file specification templates, `merge()` and `prune()`. Every release since has improved the same thing: the dictionary that decides whether a file is text or binary, most recently rebuilt from the file extensions found across 21,369 CRAN packages.
crul vs pkglite: editorial side-by-side
crul
0.0ANALYTICS
crul took mocking back from webmockr and made it a property of the client itself
◆ Current state
crul is the R6-based HTTP client underneath much of rOpenSci's package stack, covering synchronous requests, three flavours of async, pagination and retries. Its 1.6.0 release in July 2025 changed where test mocking lives: each client — HttpClient, Async, AsyncVaried — now takes a mocking parameter at initialisation or per method, and the standalone mock() function is deprecated. Mocking used to be something webmockr switched on from outside; it is now a setting on the client.
◆ Where it's heading
The async surface has been the growth area for years — retries reached Async, AsyncVaried, AsyncQueue and HttpRequest in 1.4, AsyncQueue gained the response accessors in 1.2, and 1.5.0 wired async requests up to webmockr. The 1.6.0 change reverses that direction of dependency, and it landed within a minute of webmockr's own release severing its tie to vcr. Read together, the rOpenSci HTTP stack is being deliberately untangled so each package can be used without the others.
◆ Prediction
With mock() deprecated rather than removed, the next major release is the likely point of deletion. Expect the remaining work to follow the same decoupling theme rather than adding request features.
pkglite
0.0ANALYTICS
pkglite's whole job is knowing which files in an R package are text — and it keeps getting better at guessing.
◆ Current state
pkglite packs an R package into a single plain-text file and unpacks it again, the mechanism pharmaceutical submissions use to move source through systems that accept text but not archives. The API settled at 0.2.0 with file specification templates, `merge()` and `prune()`. Every release since has improved the same thing: the dictionary that decides whether a file is text or binary, most recently rebuilt from the file extensions found across 21,369 CRAN packages.
◆ Where it's heading
The failure mode this package cares about is silent — misclassify a binary file as text and the round trip corrupts it, misclassify text as binary and it bloats or drops. So the work is empirical rather than architectural: mine real packages for what extensions actually appear, then widen coverage where specific ecosystems break the pattern. Stan interfaces via rstan brought `src/Makevars` and `src/Makefile` handling; machine learning frameworks brought their own binary formats. Dependencies have gone the other way, with cli removed and replaced by internal equivalents.
◆ Prediction
Expect the next substantive release to widen file specification coverage again for whatever package family the maintainers find breaking the default discovery, since that has been the content of every non-maintenance release for four years.
Alternatives to crul and pkglite
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either crul or pkglite.
DoseFinding
New stewardship at openpharma, then two releases adding the methods MCP-Mod was missing
webmockr
The stubbing library added httr2 support, then spent a year cutting itself free of everything else
dendroNetwork
Six releases, six identical bodies — the feed carries the package abstract instead of release notes
chattr
chattr deleted every LLM integration it had written and outsourced the lot to ellmer
cloudml
Six years since the last functional change, and Google renamed the service it wraps in the release before that
See all crul alternatives → · See all pkglite alternatives →
Recent activity from crul and pkglite
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 5mo agopkgliteMaintainer email and CI workflow updates
- 1y agocrulMocking becomes a client parameter, independent of webmockr ⚡
- 1y agopkgliteHandles Stan-interfacing packages and ML binary formats
- 1y agopkgliteExtension dictionary rebuilt from 21,369 CRAN packages
- 2y agocrulAsync requests become mockable through webmockr
- 2y agocrulDocumentation fixes and test helper tweak
- 2y agopkgliteTest helpers moved to helper.R
- 3y agocrulHTTP retries reach the async classes
- 3y agocrulClearer error for mismatched urls and disk lengths
- 3y agopkgliteMore file types recognised; cli dependency dropped
- 4y agocrulAsyncQueue gains response accessors; results print as a summary
- 5y agopkgliteFile collections gain merge, prune, and a tests template
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between crul and pkglite?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. crul and pkglite are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is crul better than pkglite?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. crul and pkglite are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to crul?
Top crul alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "crul alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/crul for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to pkglite?
Top pkglite alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "pkglite alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/pkglite for the full list with editorial commentary on each.