← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

crul vs osmextract

A side-by-side editorial comparison of crul and osmextract — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

crul vs osmextract: at a glance

Featurecrulosmextract
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themeshttp-client, async, mocking, ropensciopenstreetmap, geospatial, r-language, gdal
Last editorial update1h ago2h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is crul?

crul took mocking back from webmockr and made it a property of the client itself

crul is the R6-based HTTP client underneath much of rOpenSci's package stack, covering synchronous requests, three flavours of async, pagination and retries. Its 1.6.0 release in July 2025 changed where test mocking lives: each client — HttpClient, Async, AsyncVaried — now takes a mocking parameter at initialisation or per method, and the standalone mock() function is deprecated. Mocking used to be something webmockr switched on from outside; it is now a setting on the client.

Read the full crul trajectory →

What is osmextract?

osmextract stopped throwing your OpenStreetMap downloads away at the end of every session.

osmextract downloads OpenStreetMap extracts from Geofabrik, BBBike and openstreetmap.fr and translates them into sf objects via GDAL. The 0.6.0 release moved its download cache from `tempdir()` to a persistent `tools::R_user_dir()` location and raised the R floor to 4.1.0 to get it. It also made spatial `place` inputs self-clipping: pass an sf or bbox object and the boundary is now set to match, so only the relevant slice of a country-sized extract is processed.

Read the full osmextract trajectory →

crul vs osmextract: editorial side-by-side

C
crul
ANALYTICS
0.0

crul took mocking back from webmockr and made it a property of the client itself

◆ Current state

crul is the R6-based HTTP client underneath much of rOpenSci's package stack, covering synchronous requests, three flavours of async, pagination and retries. Its 1.6.0 release in July 2025 changed where test mocking lives: each client — HttpClient, Async, AsyncVaried — now takes a mocking parameter at initialisation or per method, and the standalone mock() function is deprecated. Mocking used to be something webmockr switched on from outside; it is now a setting on the client.

◆ Where it's heading

The async surface has been the growth area for years — retries reached Async, AsyncVaried, AsyncQueue and HttpRequest in 1.4, AsyncQueue gained the response accessors in 1.2, and 1.5.0 wired async requests up to webmockr. The 1.6.0 change reverses that direction of dependency, and it landed within a minute of webmockr's own release severing its tie to vcr. Read together, the rOpenSci HTTP stack is being deliberately untangled so each package can be used without the others.

◆ Prediction

With mock() deprecated rather than removed, the next major release is the likely point of deletion. Expect the remaining work to follow the same decoupling theme rather than adding request features.

O
osmextract
ANALYTICS
0.0

osmextract stopped throwing your OpenStreetMap downloads away at the end of every session.

◆ Current state

osmextract downloads OpenStreetMap extracts from Geofabrik, BBBike and openstreetmap.fr and translates them into sf objects via GDAL. The 0.6.0 release moved its download cache from `tempdir()` to a persistent `tools::R_user_dir()` location and raised the R floor to 4.1.0 to get it. It also made spatial `place` inputs self-clipping: pass an sf or bbox object and the boundary is now set to match, so only the relevant slice of a country-sized extract is processed.

◆ Where it's heading

Two threads run through every release. One is chasing GDAL — SQL syntax adjusted for 3.10, ogr2ogr options fixed for 3.9, and an `osmconf.ini` that 0.6.0 finally keeps automatically in sync with whatever sf or GDAL provides rather than shipping a snapshot. The other is the road-network extraction added experimentally in 0.3.1, which has been quietly accumulating real routing semantics since: `access = no` links retained when the mode-specific tag permits them, a `oneway` column by default for driving, and `motor_vehicle` always included.

◆ Prediction

Given that `oe_get_network()` has gained transport-mode detail in three separate releases while remaining flagged as experimental, the next substantive work is most likely there — either more modes or a formal exit from experimental status.

Alternatives to crul and osmextract

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either crul or osmextract.

See all crul alternatives → · See all osmextract alternatives →

Recent activity from crul and osmextract

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 4mo agoosmextractDownloads move to a persistent cache outside tempdir
  2. 1y agocrulMocking becomes a client parameter, independent of webmockr
  3. 1y agoosmextractoe_match gains a version argument for historical extracts
  4. 1y agoosmextractRouting semantics sharpen for driving and restricted-access links
  5. 2y agocrulAsync requests become mockable through webmockr
  6. 2y agoosmextract51 new openstreetmap.fr regions and a GDAL 3.9 fix
  7. 2y agocrulDocumentation fixes and test helper tweak
  8. 3y agoosmextractNon-Geofabrik downloads were saved under the wrong filename
  9. 3y agocrulHTTP retries reach the async classes
  10. 3y agocrulClearer error for mismatched urls and disk lengths
  11. 3y agoosmextractHelp files regenerated for valid HTML5
  12. 4y agocrulAsyncQueue gains response accessors; results print as a summary

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between crul and osmextract?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. crul and osmextract are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is crul better than osmextract?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. crul and osmextract are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to crul?

Top crul alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "crul alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/crul for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to osmextract?

Top osmextract alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "osmextract alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/osmextract for the full list with editorial commentary on each.