← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

crul vs mapsf

A side-by-side editorial comparison of crul and mapsf — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

crul vs mapsf: at a glance

Featurecrulmapsf
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themeshttp-client, async, mocking, ropenscicartography, thematic-maps, spatial, base-graphics
Last editorial update1h ago3h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is crul?

crul took mocking back from webmockr and made it a property of the client itself

crul is the R6-based HTTP client underneath much of rOpenSci's package stack, covering synchronous requests, three flavours of async, pagination and retries. Its 1.6.0 release in July 2025 changed where test mocking lives: each client — HttpClient, Async, AsyncVaried — now takes a mocking parameter at initialisation or per method, and the standalone mock() function is deprecated. Mocking used to be something webmockr switched on from outside; it is now a setting on the client.

Read the full crul trajectory →

What is mapsf?

Thematic mapping in base R that finally got a theming system, then spent two years polishing legends.

mapsf produces thematic maps on R's base graphics device — choropleths, proportional symbols, typology maps, rasters, and their combinations, with legends, scale bars, north arrows, and insets as composable elements. Version 1.0.0 was the structural release, introducing a theming system that deprecated eight scattered styling arguments and adding mf_png() and mf_svg() export helpers plus alpha transparency across map types. The 1.1.x and 1.2.x line since then has been steady refinement: background and extent control on the drawing functions, decimal and thousands-separator control in legends, and label placement arguments.

Read the full mapsf trajectory →

crul vs mapsf: editorial side-by-side

C
crul
ANALYTICS
0.0

crul took mocking back from webmockr and made it a property of the client itself

◆ Current state

crul is the R6-based HTTP client underneath much of rOpenSci's package stack, covering synchronous requests, three flavours of async, pagination and retries. Its 1.6.0 release in July 2025 changed where test mocking lives: each client — HttpClient, Async, AsyncVaried — now takes a mocking parameter at initialisation or per method, and the standalone mock() function is deprecated. Mocking used to be something webmockr switched on from outside; it is now a setting on the client.

◆ Where it's heading

The async surface has been the growth area for years — retries reached Async, AsyncVaried, AsyncQueue and HttpRequest in 1.4, AsyncQueue gained the response accessors in 1.2, and 1.5.0 wired async requests up to webmockr. The 1.6.0 change reverses that direction of dependency, and it landed within a minute of webmockr's own release severing its tie to vcr. Read together, the rOpenSci HTTP stack is being deliberately untangled so each package can be used without the others.

◆ Prediction

With mock() deprecated rather than removed, the next major release is the likely point of deletion. Expect the remaining work to follow the same decoupling theme rather than adding request features.

M
mapsf
ANALYTICS
0.0

Thematic mapping in base R that finally got a theming system, then spent two years polishing legends.

◆ Current state

mapsf produces thematic maps on R's base graphics device — choropleths, proportional symbols, typology maps, rasters, and their combinations, with legends, scale bars, north arrows, and insets as composable elements. Version 1.0.0 was the structural release, introducing a theming system that deprecated eight scattered styling arguments and adding mf_png() and mf_svg() export helpers plus alpha transparency across map types. The 1.1.x and 1.2.x line since then has been steady refinement: background and extent control on the drawing functions, decimal and thousands-separator control in legends, and label placement arguments.

◆ Where it's heading

The package has been consolidating control into fewer, more consistent places. Legend handling moved out to the maplegend package in 0.8.0 and the per-element mf_legend_* functions were deprecated in favor of arguments on the map calls themselves; theming replaced ad-hoc style arguments in 1.0.0; and recent releases keep propagating the same argument vocabulary — bg, extent, leg_val_rnd, leg_val_dec, leg_val_big — across every function that should accept it. Determinism is a visible concern too, with 1.2.1 fixing a seed so mf_distr() point positions stop moving between runs.

◆ Prediction

The recent releases are almost entirely argument-parity work across existing functions, so expect that to continue until the vocabulary is uniform rather than any new map type appearing.

Alternatives to crul and mapsf

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either crul or mapsf.

See all crul alternatives → · See all mapsf alternatives →

Recent activity from crul and mapsf

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agomapsfLabel placement arguments and deterministic distribution plots
  2. 2mo agomapsfBackground and extent control across the drawing functions
  3. 7mo agomapsfPNG resolution control and legend number formatting
  4. 1y agocrulMocking becomes a client parameter, independent of webmockr
  5. 1y agomapsf1.0.0 introduces theming and deprecates eight style arguments
  6. 1y agomapsfPencil-sketch layers, ckmeans breaks, and border extraction
  7. 2y agomapsfGraticule label display fix
  8. 2y agocrulAsync requests become mockable through webmockr
  9. 2y agocrulDocumentation fixes and test helper tweak
  10. 3y agocrulHTTP retries reach the async classes
  11. 3y agocrulClearer error for mismatched urls and disk lengths
  12. 4y agocrulAsyncQueue gains response accessors; results print as a summary

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between crul and mapsf?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. crul and mapsf are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is crul better than mapsf?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. crul and mapsf are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to crul?

Top crul alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "crul alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/crul for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to mapsf?

Top mapsf alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "mapsf alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/mapsf for the full list with editorial commentary on each.