← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

crul vs forcis

A side-by-side editorial comparison of crul and forcis — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:ropensci

crul vs forcis: at a glance

Featurecrulforcis
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themeshttp-client, async, mocking, ropenscidata-access, r-package, ropensci, oceanography
Last editorial update1h ago48m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is crul?

crul took mocking back from webmockr and made it a property of the client itself

crul is the R6-based HTTP client underneath much of rOpenSci's package stack, covering synchronous requests, three flavours of async, pagination and retries. Its 1.6.0 release in July 2025 changed where test mocking lives: each client — HttpClient, Async, AsyncVaried — now takes a mocking parameter at initialisation or per method, and the standalone mock() function is deprecated. Mocking used to be something webmockr switched on from outside; it is now a setting on the client.

Read the full crul trajectory →

What is forcis?

A foraminifera data-access package whose entire release history is the rOpenSci review process.

forcis provides R access to the FORCIS database of planktonic foraminifera occurrences. All three releases in the window are review milestones rather than feature work: first stable release, the release answering rOpenSci reviewer comments, and a post-CRAN-review polish. Release notes point at NEWS.md rather than enumerating changes.

Read the full forcis trajectory →

crul vs forcis: editorial side-by-side

C
crul
ANALYTICS
0.0

crul took mocking back from webmockr and made it a property of the client itself

◆ Current state

crul is the R6-based HTTP client underneath much of rOpenSci's package stack, covering synchronous requests, three flavours of async, pagination and retries. Its 1.6.0 release in July 2025 changed where test mocking lives: each client — HttpClient, Async, AsyncVaried — now takes a mocking parameter at initialisation or per method, and the standalone mock() function is deprecated. Mocking used to be something webmockr switched on from outside; it is now a setting on the client.

◆ Where it's heading

The async surface has been the growth area for years — retries reached Async, AsyncVaried, AsyncQueue and HttpRequest in 1.4, AsyncQueue gained the response accessors in 1.2, and 1.5.0 wired async requests up to webmockr. The 1.6.0 change reverses that direction of dependency, and it landed within a minute of webmockr's own release severing its tie to vcr. Read together, the rOpenSci HTTP stack is being deliberately untangled so each package can be used without the others.

◆ Prediction

With mock() deprecated rather than removed, the next major release is the likely point of deletion. Expect the remaining work to follow the same decoupling theme rather than adding request features.

F
forcis
ANALYTICS
0.0

A foraminifera data-access package whose entire release history is the rOpenSci review process.

◆ Current state

forcis provides R access to the FORCIS database of planktonic foraminifera occurrences. All three releases in the window are review milestones rather than feature work: first stable release, the release answering rOpenSci reviewer comments, and a post-CRAN-review polish. Release notes point at NEWS.md rather than enumerating changes.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is moving from research artifact to reviewed, distributable infrastructure — submitted to rOpenSci at 0.1.0, integrated review feedback at 1.0.0, cleared CRAN at 1.0.1. That arc is complete, so the next phase should be the first release driven by users rather than reviewers.

◆ Prediction

With review and CRAN acceptance both behind it, the next release is most likely to track upstream FORCIS database changes or add query conveniences; the entries themselves say nothing about planned features.

Alternatives to crul and forcis

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either crul or forcis.

See all crul alternatives → · See all forcis alternatives →

Recent activity from crul and forcis

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1y agocrulMocking becomes a client parameter, independent of webmockr
  2. 1y agoforcisPost-CRAN-review example and practice cleanup
  3. 1y agoforcis1.0.0 incorporates rOpenSci review feedback
  4. 1y agoforcisFirst stable release, submitted to rOpenSci
  5. 2y agocrulAsync requests become mockable through webmockr
  6. 2y agocrulDocumentation fixes and test helper tweak
  7. 3y agocrulHTTP retries reach the async classes
  8. 3y agocrulClearer error for mismatched urls and disk lengths
  9. 4y agocrulAsyncQueue gains response accessors; results print as a summary

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between crul and forcis?

Both compete on the same themes — ropensci — within Analytics. crul and forcis are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is crul better than forcis?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. crul and forcis are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to crul?

Top crul alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "crul alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/crul for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to forcis?

Top forcis alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "forcis alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/forcis for the full list with editorial commentary on each.