tidytlg
A tables-listings-graphs package that reached CRAN and then went quiet.
Comparison · Analytics
crul vs dfms
A side-by-side editorial comparison of crul and dfms — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:ropensci
crul vs dfms: at a glance
What is crul?
crul took mocking back from webmockr and made it a property of the client itself
crul is the R6-based HTTP client underneath much of rOpenSci's package stack, covering synchronous requests, three flavours of async, pagination and retries. Its 1.6.0 release in July 2025 changed where test mocking lives: each client — HttpClient, Async, AsyncVaried — now takes a mocking parameter at initialisation or per method, and the standalone mock() function is deprecated. Mocking used to be something webmockr switched on from outside; it is now a setting on the client.
What is dfms?
Peer-reviewed, feature-complete, and now able to hand its models to other forecasting engines.
dfms estimates dynamic factor models in R, the workhorse for nowcasting economic activity from ragged, mixed-frequency data. The package worked through the Banbura and Modugno (2014) specification in stages — quarterly variables in 0.3.0, AR(1) idiosyncratic errors combined with mixed frequency in 0.4.0 — then declared 1.0.0 feature-complete on completing rOpenSci peer review, adding news decomposition to attribute forecast revisions to specific data releases. Version 1.0.1 adds convert(), which exports fitted models to dlm or KFAS state-space objects.
crul vs dfms: editorial side-by-side
crul
0.0ANALYTICS
crul took mocking back from webmockr and made it a property of the client itself
◆ Current state
crul is the R6-based HTTP client underneath much of rOpenSci's package stack, covering synchronous requests, three flavours of async, pagination and retries. Its 1.6.0 release in July 2025 changed where test mocking lives: each client — HttpClient, Async, AsyncVaried — now takes a mocking parameter at initialisation or per method, and the standalone mock() function is deprecated. Mocking used to be something webmockr switched on from outside; it is now a setting on the client.
◆ Where it's heading
The async surface has been the growth area for years — retries reached Async, AsyncVaried, AsyncQueue and HttpRequest in 1.4, AsyncQueue gained the response accessors in 1.2, and 1.5.0 wired async requests up to webmockr. The 1.6.0 change reverses that direction of dependency, and it landed within a minute of webmockr's own release severing its tie to vcr. Read together, the rOpenSci HTTP stack is being deliberately untangled so each package can be used without the others.
◆ Prediction
With mock() deprecated rather than removed, the next major release is the likely point of deletion. Expect the remaining work to follow the same decoupling theme rather than adding request features.
dfms
0.0ANALYTICS
Peer-reviewed, feature-complete, and now able to hand its models to other forecasting engines.
◆ Current state
dfms estimates dynamic factor models in R, the workhorse for nowcasting economic activity from ragged, mixed-frequency data. The package worked through the Banbura and Modugno (2014) specification in stages — quarterly variables in 0.3.0, AR(1) idiosyncratic errors combined with mixed frequency in 0.4.0 — then declared 1.0.0 feature-complete on completing rOpenSci peer review, adding news decomposition to attribute forecast revisions to specific data releases. Version 1.0.1 adds convert(), which exports fitted models to dlm or KFAS state-space objects.
◆ Where it's heading
The package has finished the implementation programme it set out in its 2023 vignette and is now working on the edges: interoperability with other state-space packages rather than more estimation methods of its own. The convert() function is the clearest signal — instead of implementing smoothing and prediction intervals natively, it hands the model to packages that already have them. The rOpenSci move also puts it on a review-backed, documented footing that research users can cite.
◆ Prediction
Expect continued interoperability and diagnostic work rather than new estimators, since the maintainer has explicitly scoped the package as complete. Bug fixes against RcppArmadillo releases will likely remain the other recurring driver.
Alternatives to crul and dfms
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either crul or dfms.
Tplyr
Tplyr made clinical summary tables explain where every number came from.
rlistings
Clinical listings that keep inheriting their hardest problem — pagination — from the layer below.
hoardr
A cache-directory helper that has shipped nothing but CRAN-triggered patches for seven years.
gigs
gigs redesigned its whole conversion API for rOpenSci, then spent three releases getting the docs to build.
riem
A weather-data client that keeps rewriting its HTTP layer while slowly tightening its API.
Recent activity from crul and dfms
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1mo agodfmsconvert() exports models to dlm and KFAS state-space objects
- 6mo agodfms1.0: rOpenSci review passed, news decomposition added ⚡
- 6mo agodfmsMixed-frequency estimation gains AR(1) idiosyncratic errors
- 9mo agodfmsC++ compatibility with RcppArmadillo 15.0.2
- 1y agodfmsFixes estimation with a single quarterly variable
- 1y agocrulMocking becomes a client parameter, independent of webmockr ⚡
- 1y agodfmsAdds mixed-frequency estimation via quarterly.vars
- 2y agocrulAsync requests become mockable through webmockr
- 2y agocrulDocumentation fixes and test helper tweak
- 3y agocrulHTTP retries reach the async classes
- 3y agocrulClearer error for mismatched urls and disk lengths
- 4y agocrulAsyncQueue gains response accessors; results print as a summary
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between crul and dfms?
Both compete on the same themes — ropensci — within Analytics. crul and dfms are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is crul better than dfms?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. crul and dfms are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to crul?
Top crul alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "crul alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/crul for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to dfms?
Top dfms alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "dfms alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/dfms for the full list with editorial commentary on each.