Oh Dear
Oh Dear's weekly changelogs have carried a security section five weeks running.
Comparison · Infra & APIs
CrowdSec vs runc
A side-by-side editorial comparison of CrowdSec and runc — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
CrowdSec vs runc: at a glance
What is CrowdSec?
CrowdSec's 1.8.2 candidates let operators write their own bot fingerprints.
The bot detection introduced with 1.8 is now being opened to customization. The 1.8.2 candidates add custom JavaScript fingerprinting, a cscli bot subcommand and a FlagSubmission helper, and rc2 adds a RateLimit helper for the WAF plus a cookie option for embedded contexts. Operational work runs alongside it: a cs_features metric, optional limits on concurrent decision streams and TLS certificate reloads.
What is runc?
runc 1.6.0-rc.1 lifts the 1024-CPU limit and refuses settings it used to quietly ignore
The 1.6.0 cycle opened on October 6 with a first release candidate that is mostly cleanup: deprecated libcontainer APIs removed, Go 1.26 now required, urfave/cli moved from v1 to v3, and the binary about 15% smaller on amd64. The changes with operational weight are that cpuAffinity and NUMA memoryPolicy no longer stop at 1024 CPUs or nodes, and that a container asking for a read-only rootfs without its own mount namespace is now refused. Eleven days earlier 1.5.2 worked around a kernel bug, present since v6.17, that corrupted memory inside runc and caused random crashes on cgroup v2. It also stopped runc exec --cgroup from escaping into a sibling cgroup.
CrowdSec vs runc: editorial side-by-side
CrowdSec
5.0INFRA · APIS
CrowdSec's 1.8.2 candidates let operators write their own bot fingerprints.
◆ Current state
The bot detection introduced with 1.8 is now being opened to customization. The 1.8.2 candidates add custom JavaScript fingerprinting, a cscli bot subcommand and a FlagSubmission helper, and rc2 adds a RateLimit helper for the WAF plus a cookie option for embedded contexts. Operational work runs alongside it: a cs_features metric, optional limits on concurrent decision streams and TLS certificate reloads.
◆ Where it's heading
The WAF remains the center of gravity, and the direction is programmability. RateLimit, SkipProcessing and the fingerprinting hooks give rule authors primitives rather than fixed behavior. The LAPI changes point at larger deployments, where decision streaming puts load on the central API.
◆ Prediction
The final 1.8.2 is dated 26 October on GitHub, though it has not reached this feed yet. Whether fingerprint data ever joins the community blocklist remains unanswered in these notes.
runc
2.5INFRA · APIS
runc 1.6.0-rc.1 lifts the 1024-CPU limit and refuses settings it used to quietly ignore
◆ Current state
The 1.6.0 cycle opened on October 6 with a first release candidate that is mostly cleanup: deprecated libcontainer APIs removed, Go 1.26 now required, urfave/cli moved from v1 to v3, and the binary about 15% smaller on amd64. The changes with operational weight are that cpuAffinity and NUMA memoryPolicy no longer stop at 1024 CPUs or nodes, and that a container asking for a read-only rootfs without its own mount namespace is now refused. Eleven days earlier 1.5.2 worked around a kernel bug, present since v6.17, that corrupted memory inside runc and caused random crashes on cgroup v2. It also stopped runc exec --cgroup from escaping into a sibling cgroup.
◆ Where it's heading
The project keeps converting silent behaviour into explicit behaviour. Read-only requests that were ignored now fail, a umask that was dropped is now honoured, and poststart hooks moved to conform to the runtime spec. The same maintainers are shrinking the surface underneath, dropping the deprecated API and the high-level cilium/ebpf path, which took roughly 7.5% off the 1.5.2 binary. Stricter behaviour plus a smaller dependency set is what a component under every container host would be expected to do between majors.
◆ Prediction
1.5.0's notes pointed to a 1.6.0 in late October 2026, and the feed so far shows only rc.1, so further release candidates or the final are the next entries to expect. The refused read-only configurations are the change most likely to surface as user reports during testing.
Alternatives to CrowdSec and runc
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either CrowdSec or runc.
Apache ShenYu
ShenYu's AI gateway plugins are back in motion, with 2.7.2 candidate tags in October.
TestingBot
TestingBot's autumn work is plumbing: a rebuilt tunnel and another bug-tracker link.
KubeArmor
KubeArmor ships fixes as release-candidate tags, and its feed misses the finals.
All Quiet
All Quiet moves from enterprise integrations to the on-call engineer's own day.
Robusta
Robusta's recent releases patch its runner image rather than add features.
See all CrowdSec alternatives → · See all runc alternatives →
Recent activity from CrowdSec and runc
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 10d agoCrowdSec1.8.2 rc2 adds a WAF RateLimit helper and decision stream limits
- 19d agoCrowdSec1.8.2 rc1 adds custom JS fingerprinting for bot detection
- 26d agoruncRelease candidate lifts 1024-CPU limit, removes deprecated APIs
- 1mo agoruncWorkaround for kernel bug that crashed runc on cgroup v2
- 2mo agoCrowdSec1.8 rc2 tunes the bot-detection challenge, hardens acquisition
- 3mo agoCrowdSecCrowdSec 1.8 RC adds WAF bot detection and a Kubernetes datasource ⚡
- 3mo agorunctmpfs regression on Ubuntu 20.04 kernels fixed
- 4mo agoruncrunc 1.5.0 stable, with dated support windows for older branches
- 4mo agoruncCVE-2026-41579: /dev symlink host write access fixed
- 4mo agoruncRelease candidate carrying the CVE-2026-41579 fix
- 6mo agoCrowdSec1.7.8 RC: OpenAPI schema validation in the WAF
- 7mo agoCrowdSec1.7.7 RC: flexible WAF rule conditions and RE2 by default
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between CrowdSec and runc?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. CrowdSec is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 2.5), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is CrowdSec better than runc?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. CrowdSec is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 2.5), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to CrowdSec?
Top CrowdSec alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "CrowdSec alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/crowdsec for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to runc?
Top runc alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "runc alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/runc for the full list with editorial commentary on each.