Oh Dear
Oh Dear's weekly changelogs have carried a security section five weeks running.
A side-by-side editorial comparison of CrowdSec and Gitness — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
CrowdSec's 1.8.2 candidates let operators write their own bot fingerprints.
The bot detection introduced with 1.8 is now being opened to customization. The 1.8.2 candidates add custom JavaScript fingerprinting, a cscli bot subcommand and a FlagSubmission helper, and rc2 adds a RateLimit helper for the WAF plus a cookie option for embedded contexts. Operational work runs alongside it: a cs_features metric, optional limits on concurrent decision streams and TLS certificate reloads.
Harness Open Source last shipped in August 2025, on this feed at least
The feed holds two releases of Harness Open Source, tracked here as Gitness. v3.2.0 in May 2025 added Git LFS, default reviewers through branch rules and a Revert PR option; v3.3.0 that August added tag rules, a PR dashboard upgrade with favourite repositories, and a fix for a Git LFS upload path flaw. Nothing newer appears here.
The bot detection introduced with 1.8 is now being opened to customization. The 1.8.2 candidates add custom JavaScript fingerprinting, a cscli bot subcommand and a FlagSubmission helper, and rc2 adds a RateLimit helper for the WAF plus a cookie option for embedded contexts. Operational work runs alongside it: a cs_features metric, optional limits on concurrent decision streams and TLS certificate reloads.
The WAF remains the center of gravity, and the direction is programmability. RateLimit, SkipProcessing and the fingerprinting hooks give rule authors primitives rather than fixed behavior. The LAPI changes point at larger deployments, where decision streaming puts load on the central API.
The final 1.8.2 is dated 26 October on GitHub, though it has not reached this feed yet. Whether fingerprint data ever joins the community blocklist remains unanswered in these notes.
The feed holds two releases of Harness Open Source, tracked here as Gitness. v3.2.0 in May 2025 added Git LFS, default reviewers through branch rules and a Revert PR option; v3.3.0 that August added tag rules, a PR dashboard upgrade with favourite repositories, and a fix for a Git LFS upload path flaw. Nothing newer appears here.
Both releases deepen code-hosting governance: branch rules, then tag rules, plus review routing through Code Owners. That is parity work against established Git hosts rather than a new direction. With entries more than a year old, the feed shows where the project was heading in 2025, not where it is now.
The entries do not support a confident call: there is no release in this feed after v3.3.0, so it is unclear whether the project slowed or the feed stopped tracking it.
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either CrowdSec or Gitness.
Oh Dear's weekly changelogs have carried a security section five weeks running.
ShenYu's AI gateway plugins are back in motion, with 2.7.2 candidate tags in October.
TestingBot's autumn work is plumbing: a rebuilt tunnel and another bug-tracker link.
KubeArmor ships fixes as release-candidate tags, and its feed misses the finals.
All Quiet moves from enterprise integrations to the on-call engineer's own day.
Robusta's recent releases patch its runner image rather than add features.
See all CrowdSec alternatives → · See all Gitness alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. CrowdSec is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. CrowdSec is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
Top CrowdSec alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "CrowdSec alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/crowdsec for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top Gitness alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Gitness alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/gitness for the full list with editorial commentary on each.