← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

crossmap vs stringx

A side-by-side editorial comparison of crossmap and stringx — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

crossmap vs stringx: at a glance

Featurecrossmapstringx
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themespurrr extension, functional programming, deprecations, furrrr-package, strings, unicode, stringi
Last editorial update4h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is crossmap?

crossmap's roadmap is set by purrr and furrr — it deprecates what upstream deprecates.

A small package for mapping over combinations of arguments, following purrr and furrr conventions. Its own functional additions stopped after xpluck() in 2023 and the cross_fit() clustering work in 2022. Everything since tracks upstream: xmap_raw() and future_xmap_raw() are now defunct because purrr removed map_raw() and furrr removed future_pmap_raw(), and re-exported parallel helpers now come from parallelly rather than future.

Read the full crossmap trajectory →

What is stringx?

A drop-in string API for base R, kept alive by upstream check failures.

stringx reimplements base R's string and date-time functions on top of stringi, aiming for consistent and Unicode-correct behaviour. The visible window holds one behavioural change and five releases that exist because R or stringi moved underneath it. None of the recent notes add capability.

Read the full stringx trajectory →

crossmap vs stringx: editorial side-by-side

C
crossmap
ANALYTICS
0.0

crossmap's roadmap is set by purrr and furrr — it deprecates what upstream deprecates.

◆ Current state

A small package for mapping over combinations of arguments, following purrr and furrr conventions. Its own functional additions stopped after xpluck() in 2023 and the cross_fit() clustering work in 2022. Everything since tracks upstream: xmap_raw() and future_xmap_raw() are now defunct because purrr removed map_raw() and furrr removed future_pmap_raw(), and re-exported parallel helpers now come from parallelly rather than future.

◆ Where it's heading

The package has settled into being a compatible extension rather than an independent one — its release notes read as a mirror of purrr's and furrr's deprecation schedules. Note that the release stamps are unreliable here: several versions were backfilled minutes apart and the 0.3.x tags carry timestamps in reverse version order, so feed position says nothing about what shipped when.

◆ Prediction

Expect the next release to be driven by another purrr or furrr change rather than new functionality, since that has been the sole trigger for the last four.

S
stringx
ANALYTICS
0.0

A drop-in string API for base R, kept alive by upstream check failures.

◆ Current state

stringx reimplements base R's string and date-time functions on top of stringi, aiming for consistent and Unicode-correct behaviour. The visible window holds one behavioural change and five releases that exist because R or stringi moved underneath it. None of the recent notes add capability.

◆ Where it's heading

The package's shape was settled by 0.2.1 and has not changed since; every release in the past three years is either a check failure fixed or a POSIXxt defect. The one substantive note, 0.2.6, records a behaviour change inherited from stringi rather than chosen here - strptime now fills missing fields from today's midnight. That dependence is the defining fact about the feed.

◆ Prediction

The next release is most likely another compatibility fix timed to an R or stringi update, since four of the six visible releases were exactly that.

Alternatives to crossmap and stringx

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either crossmap or stringx.

See all crossmap alternatives → · See all stringx alternatives →

Recent activity from crossmap and stringx

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 6mo agocrossmapRaw-vector mapping functions removed
  2. 6mo agocrossmapRe-exports moved to the parallelly namespace
  3. 11mo agocrossmapFuture-backed tests skipped on CRAN
  4. 11mo agocrossmapInternal test fixes
  5. 1y agostringxPOSIXlt conversion now sets the GMT offset
  6. 2y agostringxTests repaired after changes in R
  7. 2y agostringxstrptime fills missing fields from today's midnight
  8. 3y agostringxChecks repaired after an R update
  9. 3y agocrossmapxpluck adds multi-index plucking
  10. 3y agostringxChecks repaired after an R-devel change
  11. 3y agostringxFailing checks fixed
  12. 4y agocrossmapCluster specifications supported in cross_fit

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between crossmap and stringx?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. crossmap and stringx are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is crossmap better than stringx?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. crossmap and stringx are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to crossmap?

Top crossmap alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "crossmap alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/crossmap for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to stringx?

Top stringx alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "stringx alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/stringx for the full list with editorial commentary on each.