← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

CRediTas vs ymlthis

A side-by-side editorial comparison of CRediTas and ymlthis — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:quarto

CRediTas vs ymlthis: at a glance

FeatureCRediTasymlthis
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesropensci, r-package, credit-taxonomy, academic-publishingr-markdown, yaml, retirement, quarto
Last editorial update4h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is CRediTas?

A CRediT author-statement generator that renamed itself, then went quiet for two years.

CRediTas turns a contributor-roles table into a CRediT Author Statement for a paper. The 0.2.0 release in April 2023 did the heavy lifting — package rename, a full object_verb() API rename, and output that drops straight into R Markdown or Quarto. The 0.3.0 release in August 2025 is the only activity since and carries no changelog text beyond a pointer to NEWS.md.

Read the full CRediTas trajectory →

What is ymlthis?

ymlthis retired itself, naming Quarto as the reason it no longer needs to exist.

ymlthis built R Markdown YAML front matter programmatically — a fluent `yml_*()` interface plus RStudio add-ins, so users did not have to hand-write metadata blocks whose valid fields were scattered across output-format documentation. Version 1.0.0 declares the package retired, with only CRAN-preserving changes to follow, and states the reason plainly: Quarto now provides good YAML support.

Read the full ymlthis trajectory →

CRediTas vs ymlthis: editorial side-by-side

C
CRediTas
ANALYTICS
0.0

A CRediT author-statement generator that renamed itself, then went quiet for two years.

◆ Current state

CRediTas turns a contributor-roles table into a CRediT Author Statement for a paper. The 0.2.0 release in April 2023 did the heavy lifting — package rename, a full object_verb() API rename, and output that drops straight into R Markdown or Quarto. The 0.3.0 release in August 2025 is the only activity since and carries no changelog text beyond a pointer to NEWS.md.

◆ Where it's heading

Development front-loaded a breaking cleanup during rOpenSci review and has coasted since. The design bet made in 0.2.0 — return a string for inline use rather than write a file — pointed the package at literate authoring workflows rather than at standalone scripts, and nothing since has moved away from it. The empty 0.3.0 note makes the current direction impossible to read from the feed.

◆ Prediction

Too little is published to call the next move; the 0.3.0 entry would need to carry its actual changes for the trajectory to be readable from the changelog at all.

Y
ymlthis
ANALYTICS
0.0

ymlthis retired itself, naming Quarto as the reason it no longer needs to exist.

◆ Current state

ymlthis built R Markdown YAML front matter programmatically — a fluent `yml_*()` interface plus RStudio add-ins, so users did not have to hand-write metadata blocks whose valid fields were scattered across output-format documentation. Version 1.0.0 declares the package retired, with only CRAN-preserving changes to follow, and states the reason plainly: Quarto now provides good YAML support.

◆ Where it's heading

The retirement is the endpoint of a long drift. Between 2020 and 2022 every release was reactive — patching around a crayon update that mangled rendered YAML, tracking shiny 1.6, following roxygen2 7.0.0, fixing a typo in an add-in. No new capability has landed in six years, and the four-year gap before 1.0.0 had already answered the question the release note finally makes explicit.

◆ Prediction

Nothing further of substance is expected — the stated policy is changes only where CRAN requires them, so the next release, if any, will be a compatibility patch.

Alternatives to CRediTas and ymlthis

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either CRediTas or ymlthis.

See all CRediTas alternatives → · See all ymlthis alternatives →

Recent activity from CRediTas and ymlthis

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 5mo agoymlthisymlthis retired; Quarto covers the need
  2. 11mo agoCRediTasVersion 0.3.0
  3. 3y agoCRediTasZenodo release (version 0.2.0)
  4. 3y agoCRediTasPackage and every function renamed; output goes inline
  5. 4y agoymlthisTypo fixed in the miniUI add-in check
  6. 4y agoymlthisyml_author() accepts yml_blank(); shiny fixes
  7. 4y agoymlthisciteproc handling moved to newer rmarkdown functions
  8. 5y agoymlthisPatched a crayon update that mangled rendered YAML
  9. 5y agoymlthisAdjustments for shiny 1.6

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between CRediTas and ymlthis?

Both compete on the same themes — quarto — within Analytics. CRediTas and ymlthis are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is CRediTas better than ymlthis?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. CRediTas and ymlthis are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to CRediTas?

Top CRediTas alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "CRediTas alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/creditas for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to ymlthis?

Top ymlthis alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ymlthis alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ymlthis for the full list with editorial commentary on each.