← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

crane vs webfakes

A side-by-side editorial comparison of crane and webfakes — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

crane vs webfakes: at a glance

Featurecranewebfakes
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesclinical-tables, mmrm, survival-analysis, gtsummarytesting, http-server, r-package, test-fixtures
Last editorial update3h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is crane?

Crane is turning into the table-and-plot layer for Roche's clinical output stack.

Crane publishes release candidates rather than finals, and the whole of 0.3.2 is carried by a single rc2 body — its two sibling tags are one-line styling commits, one of them tagged with an unsubstituted vX.Y.Z placeholder. The rc2 notes run to dozens of additions across regression tables, line plots and hierarchical rate tables.

Read the full crane trajectory →

What is webfakes?

A fake web server for tests that keeps closing the gap with the real thing.

webfakes runs a real HTTP server inside R tests so packages can exercise network code without hitting the internet. Its releases follow a consistent logic: find a class of behaviour that only the real internet could reproduce, then implement it locally. HTTPS arrived in 1.4.0; before that the httpbin clone reached full parity with the Python original, and a fake git HTTP server landed alongside CGI middleware. The most recent release, 1.5.0, is about the server's own rough edges — keep-alive timeouts, locale-independent HTTP date parsing, and trailing-slash route matching.

Read the full webfakes trajectory →

crane vs webfakes: editorial side-by-side

C
crane
INFRA · APIS
0.0

Crane is turning into the table-and-plot layer for Roche's clinical output stack.

◆ Current state

Crane publishes release candidates rather than finals, and the whole of 0.3.2 is carried by a single rc2 body — its two sibling tags are one-line styling commits, one of them tagged with an unsubstituted vX.Y.Z placeholder. The rc2 notes run to dozens of additions across regression tables, line plots and hierarchical rate tables.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is moving from plotting helpers to a full analysis-output layer: mixed models for repeated measures, pairwise Cox results, risk-management-plan tables and adverse-event incidence rates all arrive in one cycle, and the annotation machinery underneath was rebuilt for reliable table-to-axis alignment. Defaults are being pulled toward SAS and rtables output — the log-rank test now uses survival::survdiff instead of coin, and survfit confidence intervals default to plain rather than log.

◆ Prediction

Expect a 0.3.2 final close behind rc2, and the deprecated g_lineplot() family to be removed once gg_lineplot() and annotate_gg() have settled.

W
webfakes
INFRA · APIS
0.0

A fake web server for tests that keeps closing the gap with the real thing.

◆ Current state

webfakes runs a real HTTP server inside R tests so packages can exercise network code without hitting the internet. Its releases follow a consistent logic: find a class of behaviour that only the real internet could reproduce, then implement it locally. HTTPS arrived in 1.4.0; before that the httpbin clone reached full parity with the Python original, and a fake git HTTP server landed alongside CGI middleware. The most recent release, 1.5.0, is about the server's own rough edges — keep-alive timeouts, locale-independent HTTP date parsing, and trailing-slash route matching.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is converging on being indistinguishable from a real server for test purposes, which is the only way it stays useful — every unsupported protocol feature is a piece of code someone cannot test offline. The remaining work has visibly shifted from missing endpoints to correctness details: date header parsing under unusual locales, keep-alive tuning, request body handling across content types.

◆ Prediction

Expect continued fidelity work against real-server behaviour rather than new app types, with HTTP/2 or authentication schemes the most plausible next gaps given the direction HTTPS opened. The entries do not indicate a specific planned feature.

Alternatives to crane and webfakes

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either crane or webfakes.

See all crane alternatives → · See all webfakes alternatives →

Recent activity from crane and webfakes

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 2mo agocraneMMRM, Cox and incidence-rate tables land in one release
  2. 2mo agocraneExample styling and runtime cleanup
  3. 2mo agocranePlaceholder release tag from the same styling commit
  4. 2mo agowebfakesKeep-alive tuning, locale-safe HTTP dates, looser routes
  5. 1y agowebfakesHTTPS support lands in the fake server
  6. 1y agowebfakesNew decode_url server option
  7. 2y agowebfakesAdds a fake git HTTP server and CGI middleware
  8. 2y agowebfakesFixes tmpl_glue() on affected macOS builds
  9. 3y agowebfakeshttpbin clone reaches parity with the Python original

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between crane and webfakes?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. crane and webfakes are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is crane better than webfakes?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. crane and webfakes are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to crane?

Top crane alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "crane alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/crane for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to webfakes?

Top webfakes alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "webfakes alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/webfakes for the full list with editorial commentary on each.