← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

crandep vs texor

A side-by-side editorial comparison of crandep and texor — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

crandep vs texor: at a glance

Featurecrandeptexor
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themescran, dependency-network, power-law, mcmclatex, r-markdown, document-conversion, sweave
Last editorial update1h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is crandep?

Half CRAN dependency scraper, half extreme-value modelling kit — and the scraper half keeps finding bugs.

crandep does two jobs that rarely share a package: it harvests the CRAN dependency network, and it fits power-law and extreme-value mixture models to the resulting degree distributions. The 2024 releases were all model work — profile posteriors, wrappers, a constrained variant, a TZP-power-law mixture between the two- and three-component models. The 2025 releases are entirely the other half, fixing what the harvester was silently getting wrong.

Read the full crandep trajectory →

What is texor?

The LaTeX-to-R-Markdown converter that stopped transcribing articles and started making them executable.

texor converts legacy R Journal articles from LaTeX into R Markdown, wrestling with the parts that never translate cleanly: numbering, cross-references, algorithm environments, and macros nobody outside the R Journal uses. Since 1.5.0 it can also emit figures as code chunks and tables as CSV read back through kable(), and target bookdown, litedown or biocstyle. The 2025 releases are repair work — pandoc keeps changing underneath it.

Read the full texor trajectory →

crandep vs texor: editorial side-by-side

C
crandep
INFRA · APIS
0.0

Half CRAN dependency scraper, half extreme-value modelling kit — and the scraper half keeps finding bugs.

◆ Current state

crandep does two jobs that rarely share a package: it harvests the CRAN dependency network, and it fits power-law and extreme-value mixture models to the resulting degree distributions. The 2024 releases were all model work — profile posteriors, wrappers, a constrained variant, a TZP-power-law mixture between the two- and three-component models. The 2025 releases are entirely the other half, fixing what the harvester was silently getting wrong.

◆ Where it's heading

The modelling side has settled into a family of mixtures with matching wrapper and profile-posterior functions, and has not gained a new component since mid-2024. Attention has shifted to data quality in the scraper, where two consecutive releases dealt with the same class of problem: rows that should not exist because of trailing commas in CRAN's own metadata, and rows that should exist but did not because orphan packages have no edges. For a package whose science is degree distributions, missing isolated nodes is a modelling error, not a formatting one.

◆ Prediction

Expect further hardening against CRAN metadata quirks in the harvesting functions; the mixture-model side looks feature-complete and is likely to stay quiet unless a new component model is published.

T
texor
INFRA · APIS
0.0

The LaTeX-to-R-Markdown converter that stopped transcribing articles and started making them executable.

◆ Current state

texor converts legacy R Journal articles from LaTeX into R Markdown, wrestling with the parts that never translate cleanly: numbering, cross-references, algorithm environments, and macros nobody outside the R Journal uses. Since 1.5.0 it can also emit figures as code chunks and tables as CSV read back through kable(), and target bookdown, litedown or biocstyle. The 2025 releases are repair work — pandoc keeps changing underneath it.

◆ Where it's heading

Two expansions define the arc. 1.4.0 took on Sweave as a source format, opening the pre-Rmd back catalogue of literate R documents. 1.5.0 changed what comes out the other end, offering executable code chunks and data files where earlier versions produced flat markup. Both moves point the same way: toward converted articles that still compute rather than merely resemble the original. Everything since has been keeping that machinery working against pandoc's release cadence.

◆ Prediction

The last two releases were both triggered by upstream pandoc changes breaking numbering or Lua filters, so the next release is most likely more of the same; new output styles remain the plausible feature direction given how recently that list was extended.

Alternatives to crandep and texor

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either crandep or texor.

See all crandep alternatives → · See all texor alternatives →

Recent activity from crandep and texor

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1y agocrandepDependency harvest split in two so orphan packages stop disappearing
  2. 1y agocrandepTrailing commas in CRAN metadata no longer produce empty-name rows
  3. 1y agotexorBroken figure and table numbering repaired after pandoc updates
  4. 1y agotexorDESCRIPTION path, cleanup ordering, and a pandoc filter patch
  5. 1y agotexorExecutable figure chunks, CSV-backed tables, and new vignette styles
  6. 2y agotexorSweave becomes a supported source format
  7. 2y agocrandepConstrained two-component mixture with continuity at the threshold
  8. 2y agocrandepArgument names normalised to x_max; MCMC wrapper defaults set
  9. 2y agocrandepTZP-power-law mixture fills the gap between the 2- and 3-component models
  10. 2y agocrandepProfile posteriors and chained MCMC wrappers for the mixture models
  11. 2y agotexorBookdown-style equation references and LaTeX macro workarounds
  12. 3y agotexorNumbering for code blocks and wide tables, plus seven more macros

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between crandep and texor?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. crandep and texor are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is crandep better than texor?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. crandep and texor are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to crandep?

Top crandep alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "crandep alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/crandep for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to texor?

Top texor alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "texor alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/texor for the full list with editorial commentary on each.