← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

crandep vs eatGADS

A side-by-side editorial comparison of crandep and eatGADS — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

crandep vs eatGADS: at a glance

FeaturecrandepeatGADS
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themescran, dependency-network, power-law, mcmcsurvey-data, spss, value-labels, missing-data
Last editorial update1h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is crandep?

Half CRAN dependency scraper, half extreme-value modelling kit — and the scraper half keeps finding bugs.

crandep does two jobs that rarely share a package: it harvests the CRAN dependency network, and it fits power-law and extreme-value mixture models to the resulting degree distributions. The 2024 releases were all model work — profile posteriors, wrappers, a constrained variant, a TZP-power-law mixture between the two- and three-component models. The 2025 releases are entirely the other half, fixing what the harvester was silently getting wrong.

Read the full crandep trajectory →

What is eatGADS?

Labelled survey data, one edge case at a time — and the edge cases are all about missing values.

eatGADS manages labelled survey and assessment data in R, the SPSS-descended world of value labels, missing tags, and metadata that has to survive every transformation. Releases are roughly annual and dense. The current one, 1.2.0, is about doing things in bulk: changing value labels, missing tags, and recodings across many variables at once rather than one at a time.

Read the full eatGADS trajectory →

crandep vs eatGADS: editorial side-by-side

C
crandep
INFRA · APIS
0.0

Half CRAN dependency scraper, half extreme-value modelling kit — and the scraper half keeps finding bugs.

◆ Current state

crandep does two jobs that rarely share a package: it harvests the CRAN dependency network, and it fits power-law and extreme-value mixture models to the resulting degree distributions. The 2024 releases were all model work — profile posteriors, wrappers, a constrained variant, a TZP-power-law mixture between the two- and three-component models. The 2025 releases are entirely the other half, fixing what the harvester was silently getting wrong.

◆ Where it's heading

The modelling side has settled into a family of mixtures with matching wrapper and profile-posterior functions, and has not gained a new component since mid-2024. Attention has shifted to data quality in the scraper, where two consecutive releases dealt with the same class of problem: rows that should not exist because of trailing commas in CRAN's own metadata, and rows that should exist but did not because orphan packages have no edges. For a package whose science is degree distributions, missing isolated nodes is a modelling error, not a formatting one.

◆ Prediction

Expect further hardening against CRAN metadata quirks in the harvesting functions; the mixture-model side looks feature-complete and is likely to stay quiet unless a new component model is published.

E
eatGADS
INFRA · APIS
0.0

Labelled survey data, one edge case at a time — and the edge cases are all about missing values.

◆ Current state

eatGADS manages labelled survey and assessment data in R, the SPSS-descended world of value labels, missing tags, and metadata that has to survive every transformation. Releases are roughly annual and dense. The current one, 1.2.0, is about doing things in bulk: changing value labels, missing tags, and recodings across many variables at once rather than one at a time.

◆ Where it's heading

The feature line and the bug line point at the same thing from opposite directions. Features keep widening the aperture — multiple variables, multiple ID variables, comparisons within a single object — while fixes keep landing on the collision between value labels and missing codes, where a value can be labelled NA, duplicated, or tagged and transformed away. extractData() and extractData2() alone absorbed eight separate correctness fixes across the last two releases. The package is hardening the one place labelled data is most likely to lose information.

◆ Prediction

Expect the bulk-operation pattern to spread to the remaining single-variable functions, and continued fixes wherever value labels and missing tags interact; the extraction path is clearly still the weak point.

Alternatives to crandep and eatGADS

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either crandep or eatGADS.

See all crandep alternatives → · See all eatGADS alternatives →

Recent activity from crandep and eatGADS

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1y agocrandepDependency harvest split in two so orphan packages stop disappearing
  2. 1y agoeatGADSValue labels, missings, and recodes go multi-variable
  3. 1y agocrandepTrailing commas in CRAN metadata no longer produce empty-name rows
  4. 1y agoeatGADSTibble import and within-object difference inspection
  5. 2y agocrandepConstrained two-component mixture with continuity at the threshold
  6. 2y agocrandepArgument names normalised to x_max; MCMC wrapper defaults set
  7. 2y agocrandepTZP-power-law mixture fills the gap between the 2- and 3-component models
  8. 2y agocrandepProfile posteriors and chained MCMC wrappers for the mixture models
  9. 3y agoeatGADSVariable clone, create, insert, and auto-recode round out the toolkit

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between crandep and eatGADS?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Infra & APIs. crandep and eatGADS are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is crandep better than eatGADS?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. crandep and eatGADS are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to crandep?

Top crandep alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "crandep alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/crandep for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to eatGADS?

Top eatGADS alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "eatGADS alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/eatgads for the full list with editorial commentary on each.