Tinylytics
Tinylytics adds account-wide IP ignores and monitoring-only sites
A side-by-side editorial comparison of Count and ntopng — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Count's agent now shows the chain of cells and assumptions behind every answer it gives.
Count is a data-canvas analytics tool organized around an AI agent. Its late-October release added Reasoning Chains, which link each claim and chart in an agent answer back to the cells, sources and assumptions behind it. Over the summer it rebuilt the agent with web data and auto layout, moved Python to a server sandbox with any PyPI package, and added longer agent conversations, a faster empty-canvas start and catalog views that stay populated while they refresh.
ntopng 7.0 adds an AI traffic analyst, Wazuh integration and BGP in one release.
ntopng 7.0 arrived in September, ten months after 6.6. nAnalyst brings AI chat, policies, dashboards and an agentic loop across multiple LLM providers, with an MCP server included. The release also adds Wazuh XDR/SIEM integration, a Sites hierarchy, BGP/BMP with RPKI validation, a ClickHouse timeseries engine, OpenID Connect SSO, MFA and passkeys, and a new Vue.js frontend replacing legacy pages.
Count is a data-canvas analytics tool organized around an AI agent. Its late-October release added Reasoning Chains, which link each claim and chart in an agent answer back to the cells, sources and assumptions behind it. Over the summer it rebuilt the agent with web data and auto layout, moved Python to a server sandbox with any PyPI package, and added longer agent conversations, a faster empty-canvas start and catalog views that stay populated while they refresh.
Count is making the agent the main way to work in the canvas, then adding the checks that let people trust its output. Reasoning Chains and server-side Python with managed secrets point at analysis that can be audited and run on real data. Steady fix lists for agent edits show the agent is still being hardened.
Expect more ways to inspect and correct agent work, building on Reasoning Chains. The entries don't show whether chains will extend to Slack answers.
ntopng 7.0 arrived in September, ten months after 6.6. nAnalyst brings AI chat, policies, dashboards and an agentic loop across multiple LLM providers, with an MCP server included. The release also adds Wazuh XDR/SIEM integration, a Sites hierarchy, BGP/BMP with RPKI validation, a ClickHouse timeseries engine, OpenID Connect SSO, MFA and passkeys, and a new Vue.js frontend replacing legacy pages.
Each major has annexed an adjacent category, and 7.0 reaches for three at once: AI-assisted analysis, SIEM-adjacent security and routing visibility. ClickHouse is now the assumed foundation, and nAnalyst requires it. The licensing line is also explicit, with nAnalyst limited to enterprise M and above and the MCP functions split between community and pro.
Point releases should focus on nAnalyst and the new frontend, the two largest and least mature surfaces. The next major, on past spacing, is about a year off and likely extends the same analysis and security surfaces.
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Count or ntopng.
Tinylytics adds account-wide IP ignores and monitoring-only sites
DebugBear is growing from performance testing into uptime, browser support and ad-impact data.
OpenReplay lets self-hosters block the hosts a recorded session can make its asset cacher fetch.
OpenHouse records why table maintenance fails and adds timezone-aware retention.
OpenCTI accepts Filigran licenses and closes a draft-access hole in its TAXII routes.
InfluxDB keeps patching its 3.11 and 3.12 lines, now with a catalog repair tool.
See all Count alternatives → · See all ntopng alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
Both compete on the same themes — mcp — within Analytics. Count is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Count is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
Top Count alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Count alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/count for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top ntopng alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ntopng alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ntopng for the full list with editorial commentary on each.