Tines
Tines lets admins grant each product area separately without splitting teams.
A side-by-side editorial comparison of Coolify and Rivet — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
| Feature | Coolify | Rivet |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | DevOps | DevOps |
| Velocity score | 2.5 | 7.5 |
| Sparks · 30d | 0 | 3 |
| Top themes | self-hosted-paas, oidc-sso, authentication, multi-tenancy | actors, ai agents, sqlite, forking |
| Last editorial update | 2mo ago | 2d ago |
| Website | — | — |
After four quiet months, Coolify's v4.4 candidate arrives carrying single sign-on.
Coolify has published the first release candidate for v4.4, its first entry since late April — a four-month gap in a feed that had been running on near-weekly betas. The release is dominated by authentication: first-class OpenID Connect with discovery, JWKS signing-key resolution, token validation, PKCE and identity linking, plus registration-policy controls and an option to auto-join OIDC users to the root team. Team-scoped integration tokens land alongside it, with their own create, edit and permission handling. It is explicitly not for production use.
Rivet Actors can now fork in 20 ms, SQLite database included, without copying data.
Rivet builds infrastructure for long-lived actors and AI agents: BYOC, OpenTelemetry tracing, actor-scoped JWTs and agentOS Hosted VMs. The 3.0 Preview made Rivet a single stateless binary on S3, and the Rust SDK reached general availability on 6 November. On 11 November Rivet added actor forking: a fork starts in 20 ms with the original actor's state and SQLite database and costs nothing until it writes.
Coolify has published the first release candidate for v4.4, its first entry since late April — a four-month gap in a feed that had been running on near-weekly betas. The release is dominated by authentication: first-class OpenID Connect with discovery, JWKS signing-key resolution, token validation, PKCE and identity linking, plus registration-policy controls and an option to auto-join OIDC users to the root team. Team-scoped integration tokens land alongside it, with their own create, edit and permission handling. It is explicitly not for production use.
The earlier beta run was security hardening — team-scoped queries, encrypted webhook secrets, mass-assignment protection, a guard against pruning persistent containers. v4.4 continues that line but changes its character: where the betas were closing holes in a single-team deployment, OIDC and team-scoped integration tokens are the features an organisation requires before it will let a self-hosted PaaS hold its infrastructure. Identity delegated to a corporate provider, and API access scoped per team, are the two things that were missing. The long publishing gap and the jump from a beta.474 numbering to a 4.4 candidate suggest the work was done off the release feed rather than paused.
The stable v4.4 is the next thing to expect and the release where this work should be judged, since the candidate ships explicitly for testing. Given the OIDC groundwork now includes registration policy and team auto-join, group or role mapping from the identity provider is the natural follow-on once SSO itself settles.
Rivet builds infrastructure for long-lived actors and AI agents: BYOC, OpenTelemetry tracing, actor-scoped JWTs and agentOS Hosted VMs. The 3.0 Preview made Rivet a single stateless binary on S3, and the Rust SDK reached general availability on 6 November. On 11 November Rivet added actor forking: a fork starts in 20 ms with the original actor's state and SQLite database and costs nothing until it writes.
Rivet keeps turning its S3-backed storage engine into features for agent workloads. Copy-on-write forking follows from the 3.0 storage design and gives agents a cheap way to branch a session, try something and discard it. The SDK and auth work of the past two months points to Rivet positioning actors as the runtime for agent backends.
Forking is likely to show up next in agentOS and the Pi integrations as a way to branch agent runs; the entries do not say when 3.0 leaves preview.
Other DevOps products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Coolify or Rivet.
Tines lets admins grant each product area separately without splitting teams.
Appsmith 2.7 makes its MCP agent ask before deleting widgets and blocks stale edits.
Arrow Rust cuts release candidates on three older lines at once.
Sanity's MCP server now explains failed validations and stops skipping them.
GitHub sets a December 8 cutoff for ARM32 Actions runners and opens AI Scan to the API.
Manticore keeps patching 31.x, now fixing a FREEZE crash and a DocID ordering bug.
See all Coolify alternatives → · See all Rivet alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Rivet is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 7.5 vs 2.5), with 3 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Rivet is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 7.5 vs 2.5), with 3 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other DevOps products to evaluate alongside.
Top Coolify alternatives in DevOps are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Coolify alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/coolify for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top Rivet alternatives in DevOps are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Rivet alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rivet for the full list with editorial commentary on each.