← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

contagionchannels vs inti

A side-by-side editorial comparison of contagionchannels and inti — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

contagionchannels vs inti: at a glance

Featurecontagionchannelsinti
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.02.5
Sparks · 30d00
Top themeseconometrics, contagion-analysis, cran-submission, r-packageplant-science, pca, shiny, reproducible-reporting
Last editorial update1h ago2h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is contagionchannels?

Three releases in ten days, every one of them a CRAN reviewer's correction rather than a code change.

contagionchannels reached CRAN on 2026-05-08 with a methodology preprint behind it and a cross-quantilogram lineage visible in its citations. What the release feed does not contain is any description of what the package computes: all three entries document the submission process — a licence field reduced from GPL-3 plus file to plain GPL-3, an arXiv reference rewritten in canonical DOI form, and a base-graphics fallback adjusted on a reviewer's request.

Read the full contagionchannels trajectory →

What is inti?

inti keeps compounding small statistics and publishing tools for plant-science labs.

inti bundles the tooling a plant-science lab uses end to end: the Yupana analysis app, the Tarpuy experiment planner, scihub and rticle document rendering, and helpers for ANOVA and heritability. The 0.7.x line has been dominated by one thread, a PCA sub-module in Yupana carrying variable contribution, dimension correlation, supplementary variables and per-dimension selection. Releases are cumulative: 0.7.0, 0.7.1 and 0.7.2 all restate the same PCA lines, with each tag adding a few items on top, and 0.7.0 itself is split across two tags published 35 seconds apart.

Read the full inti trajectory →

contagionchannels vs inti: editorial side-by-side

C
contagionchannels
INFRA · APIS
0.0

Three releases in ten days, every one of them a CRAN reviewer's correction rather than a code change.

◆ Current state

contagionchannels reached CRAN on 2026-05-08 with a methodology preprint behind it and a cross-quantilogram lineage visible in its citations. What the release feed does not contain is any description of what the package computes: all three entries document the submission process — a licence field reduced from GPL-3 plus file to plain GPL-3, an arXiv reference rewritten in canonical DOI form, and a base-graphics fallback adjusted on a reviewer's request.

◆ Where it's heading

There is no product trajectory to read here yet, only a submission one, and it is unusually well documented — each entry names the reviewer or check that prompted it and quotes the feedback verbatim. That transparency is the one signal available: the maintainer treats review rounds as releases worth publishing rather than squashing. Any judgement about direction will have to wait for a release that changes the package rather than its metadata.

◆ Prediction

With CRAN acceptance secured, the next release should be the first to carry actual methodological content; until one appears, there is not enough in these entries to say where the package is heading.

I
inti
INFRA · APIS
2.5

inti keeps compounding small statistics and publishing tools for plant-science labs.

◆ Current state

inti bundles the tooling a plant-science lab uses end to end: the Yupana analysis app, the Tarpuy experiment planner, scihub and rticle document rendering, and helpers for ANOVA and heritability. The 0.7.x line has been dominated by one thread, a PCA sub-module in Yupana carrying variable contribution, dimension correlation, supplementary variables and per-dimension selection. Releases are cumulative: 0.7.0, 0.7.1 and 0.7.2 all restate the same PCA lines, with each tag adding a few items on top, and 0.7.0 itself is split across two tags published 35 seconds apart.

◆ Where it's heading

Two axes are moving. Analysis is deepening inside Yupana, where PCA went from a single view to a sub-module with its own contribution and correlation outputs across three tags. Publishing is widening around rticle() and scihub(), which now handle Google Docs markdown, crossrefs and page numbers, continuing the gdocs2qmd work from the 0.6 line. Neither is a change of direction; the package accretes features where the maintainer's own research workflow needs them.

◆ Prediction

Expect the next tag to extend the PCA sub-module again and add another rticle() or scihub() rendering detail, on the two-to-six-week cadence the 0.7 line has held.

Alternatives to contagionchannels and inti

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either contagionchannels or inti.

See all contagionchannels alternatives → · See all inti alternatives →

Recent activity from contagionchannels and inti

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 22d agointiscihub() gains pages, rticle() improves crossrefs
  2. 1mo agointi0.7.1 restates the 0.7.0 PCA and Tarpuy notes
  3. 2mo agointiPCA sub-module adds contribution and dimension correlation
  4. 2mo agointiNew rticle() renders Google Docs markdown into articles
  5. 3mo agocontagionchannelsv0.1.3 — first CRAN release
  6. 3mo agocontagionchannelsv0.1.2: switch arXiv reference in DESCRIPTION to canonical DOI form
  7. 3mo agocontagionchannelsv0.1.1: address CRAN reviewer feedback (License) + add arXiv reference
  8. 10mo agointiH2cal() takes factors as a formula; scihub() templates updated
  9. 11mo agointiSciHub RStudio addin arrives; gdocs2qmd table export fixed

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between contagionchannels and inti?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Infra & APIs. inti is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is contagionchannels better than inti?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. inti is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to contagionchannels?

Top contagionchannels alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "contagionchannels alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/contagionchannels for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to inti?

Top inti alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "inti alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/inti for the full list with editorial commentary on each.