← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

condformat vs maths.genealogy

A side-by-side editorial comparison of condformat and maths.genealogy — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

condformat vs maths.genealogy: at a glance

Featurecondformatmaths.genealogy
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesr-package, table-formatting, test-coverage, maintenance-debtacademic-genealogy, api-client, graph-visualisation, cran-compliance
Last editorial update4h ago48m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is condformat?

A dormant table-formatting package woken by a 20-PR correctness and coverage sweep

condformat applies conditional formatting rules to R data frames and renders them to HTML, LaTeX, Excel and grob output. After 0.10.1 in 2023 it went quiet for nearly three years. Version 0.11.0 breaks that silence with a single-maintainer sweep of roughly twenty pull requests: CI modernized across R-devel, release and oldrel; lockcells fixed for LaTeX and grob output; a rule_fill_bar() crash at zero width; theme_htmlTable() no longer dropping chained arguments; and a .col pronoun added across all rules.

Read the full condformat trajectory →

What is maths.genealogy?

A young Mathematics Genealogy client spending its first four releases satisfying CRAN.

maths.genealogy queries the Mathematics Genealogy Project over a WebSocket connection and renders academic advisor-student trees, with plot_grviz() as the visualisation entry point. The package reached CRAN in early 2025 and its functional surface has barely moved since — max_zoom() for deep trees at 0.1.1 is the only user-facing addition in the visible history.

Read the full maths.genealogy trajectory →

condformat vs maths.genealogy: editorial side-by-side

C
condformat
ANALYTICS
0.0

A dormant table-formatting package woken by a 20-PR correctness and coverage sweep

◆ Current state

condformat applies conditional formatting rules to R data frames and renders them to HTML, LaTeX, Excel and grob output. After 0.10.1 in 2023 it went quiet for nearly three years. Version 0.11.0 breaks that silence with a single-maintainer sweep of roughly twenty pull requests: CI modernized across R-devel, release and oldrel; lockcells fixed for LaTeX and grob output; a rule_fill_bar() crash at zero width; theme_htmlTable() no longer dropping chained arguments; and a .col pronoun added across all rules.

◆ Where it's heading

This is a maintenance-debt payoff rather than a change of direction. The bulk of 0.11.0 is test coverage — render_gtable, knit_print, theme_grob, render_xlsx and rule_fill_bar all gained tests — which reads as a maintainer establishing a safety net before touching anything further. The .col pronoun and scalar recycling in the text rules are the only real API additions, and both smooth inconsistencies rather than extend the rule vocabulary.

◆ Prediction

With coverage and CI now in place, the next release is more likely to extend rule or output-format support than to continue with fixes, though the three-year gap makes cadence hard to call from these entries alone.

M0.0

A young Mathematics Genealogy client spending its first four releases satisfying CRAN.

◆ Current state

maths.genealogy queries the Mathematics Genealogy Project over a WebSocket connection and renders academic advisor-student trees, with plot_grviz() as the visualisation entry point. The package reached CRAN in early 2025 and its functional surface has barely moved since — max_zoom() for deep trees at 0.1.1 is the only user-facing addition in the visible history.

◆ Where it's heading

Every release after the first is CRAN policy management. Three consecutive entries deal with the same underlying problem: examples that hit a live network resource and therefore fail unpredictably on check machines. The progression from wrapping them in \donttest{} to catching a stray case to rewriting all examples against published API-package guidance shows the maintainer converging on a pattern rather than adding features. That is the normal cost of shipping a network client to CRAN, and it appears to be settling.

◆ Prediction

With the examples problem resolved, the next release is the first plausible opportunity for feature work — likely on the plotting side, given max_zoom() was the sole non-compliance change so far. The entries do not name anything specific in progress.

Alternatives to condformat and maths.genealogy

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either condformat or maths.genealogy.

See all condformat alternatives → · See all maths.genealogy alternatives →

Recent activity from condformat and maths.genealogy

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agocondformatEnds a three-year gap with a 20-PR fix and coverage sweep
  2. 1y agomaths.genealogyExamples rewritten to CRAN API-package guidance
  3. 1y agomaths.genealogyRemaining network-dependent example wrapped in donttest
  4. 1y agomaths.genealogyDESCRIPTION quoting and donttest example wrapping
  5. 1y agomaths.genealogyplot_grviz() gains max_zoom for deep trees
  6. 2y agocondformatDocumentation fixes and internal S3 method registration
  7. 3y agocondformatcondformat2grob() gains a draw argument for composite figures
  8. 6y agocondformatDrops the lazyeval API and replaces xlsx with openxlsx
  9. 7y agocondformatAdds bar, bold and color rules plus grob rendering
  10. 8y agocondformatIntroduces the tidy-evaluation API alongside the old one

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between condformat and maths.genealogy?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. condformat and maths.genealogy are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is condformat better than maths.genealogy?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. condformat and maths.genealogy are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to condformat?

Top condformat alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "condformat alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/condformat for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to maths.genealogy?

Top maths.genealogy alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "maths.genealogy alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/maths-genealogy for the full list with editorial commentary on each.