← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

condformat vs fillpattern

A side-by-side editorial comparison of condformat and fillpattern — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

condformat vs fillpattern: at a glance

Featurecondformatfillpattern
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesr-package, table-formatting, test-coverage, maintenance-debtggplot2, data-visualization, accessibility, graphics
Last editorial update1h ago49m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is condformat?

A dormant table-formatting package woken by a 20-PR correctness and coverage sweep

condformat applies conditional formatting rules to R data frames and renders them to HTML, LaTeX, Excel and grob output. After 0.10.1 in 2023 it went quiet for nearly three years. Version 0.11.0 breaks that silence with a single-maintainer sweep of roughly twenty pull requests: CI modernized across R-devel, release and oldrel; lockcells fixed for LaTeX and grob output; a rule_fill_bar() crash at zero width; theme_htmlTable() no longer dropping chained arguments; and a .col pronoun added across all rules.

Read the full condformat trajectory →

What is fillpattern?

Pattern fills for ggplot2, hardened against the ways users write sizes

fillpattern provides pattern fills — stripes, bricks, dots — for ggplot2 and base R graphics, aimed at figures that must stay legible in greyscale or to colour-blind readers. The 1.0.3 release is mostly defensive: size modifier strings ending in a colon no longer swap width for height, modify_size() reports invalid units instead of crashing and understands in, inches and cm, and a background colour bug in scale_fill_pattern() is fixed. The minimum R version rises to 4.2.0 for recent graphics engine features.

Read the full fillpattern trajectory →

condformat vs fillpattern: editorial side-by-side

C
condformat
ANALYTICS
0.0

A dormant table-formatting package woken by a 20-PR correctness and coverage sweep

◆ Current state

condformat applies conditional formatting rules to R data frames and renders them to HTML, LaTeX, Excel and grob output. After 0.10.1 in 2023 it went quiet for nearly three years. Version 0.11.0 breaks that silence with a single-maintainer sweep of roughly twenty pull requests: CI modernized across R-devel, release and oldrel; lockcells fixed for LaTeX and grob output; a rule_fill_bar() crash at zero width; theme_htmlTable() no longer dropping chained arguments; and a .col pronoun added across all rules.

◆ Where it's heading

This is a maintenance-debt payoff rather than a change of direction. The bulk of 0.11.0 is test coverage — render_gtable, knit_print, theme_grob, render_xlsx and rule_fill_bar all gained tests — which reads as a maintainer establishing a safety net before touching anything further. The .col pronoun and scalar recycling in the text rules are the only real API additions, and both smooth inconsistencies rather than extend the rule vocabulary.

◆ Prediction

With coverage and CI now in place, the next release is more likely to extend rule or output-format support than to continue with fixes, though the three-year gap makes cadence hard to call from these entries alone.

F
fillpattern
ANALYTICS
0.0

Pattern fills for ggplot2, hardened against the ways users write sizes

◆ Current state

fillpattern provides pattern fills — stripes, bricks, dots — for ggplot2 and base R graphics, aimed at figures that must stay legible in greyscale or to colour-blind readers. The 1.0.3 release is mostly defensive: size modifier strings ending in a colon no longer swap width for height, modify_size() reports invalid units instead of crashing and understands in, inches and cm, and a background colour bug in scale_fill_pattern() is fixed. The minimum R version rises to 4.2.0 for recent graphics engine features.

◆ Where it's heading

Development is slow and entirely reactive to how the string-based size interface fails. The pattern across releases is the same: a user hits an edge — very small fill areas in 1.0.2, malformed unit strings in 1.0.3 — and the fix is either a graceful fallback or a clearer error. Leaning on R's newer graphics engine rather than reimplementing pattern rendering keeps the package small at the cost of raising its version floor.

◆ Prediction

Expect further releases to stay in the same register: parsing and validation fixes for the size and unit interface, with the pattern set itself unlikely to change.

Alternatives to condformat and fillpattern

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either condformat or fillpattern.

See all condformat alternatives → · See all fillpattern alternatives →

Recent activity from condformat and fillpattern

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agocondformatEnds a three-year gap with a 20-PR fix and coverage sweep
  2. 6mo agofillpatternSize string parsing fixed; invalid units now report instead of crash
  3. 2y agofillpatternSmall fill areas no longer crash; min_size falls back to solid
  4. 2y agofillpatternfillpattern 1.0.1
  5. 2y agocondformatDocumentation fixes and internal S3 method registration
  6. 3y agocondformatcondformat2grob() gains a draw argument for composite figures
  7. 6y agocondformatDrops the lazyeval API and replaces xlsx with openxlsx
  8. 7y agocondformatAdds bar, bold and color rules plus grob rendering
  9. 8y agocondformatIntroduces the tidy-evaluation API alongside the old one

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between condformat and fillpattern?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. condformat and fillpattern are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is condformat better than fillpattern?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. condformat and fillpattern are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to condformat?

Top condformat alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "condformat alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/condformat for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to fillpattern?

Top fillpattern alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "fillpattern alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/fillpattern for the full list with editorial commentary on each.