← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

common vs MetaboAnalystR

A side-by-side editorial comparison of common and MetaboAnalystR — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

common vs MetaboAnalystR: at a glance

FeaturecommonMetaboAnalystR
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesr-utilities, base-r-extensions, infix-operators, data-frame-toolsmetabolomics, exposomics, lc-ms, spectral-processing
Last editorial update25m ago20m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is common?

A base-R utility belt that grows one small function at a time, on no particular schedule

common collects small helpers that base R leaves out — data frame labelling and sorting, infix operators for pasting and equality, UTF-8 superscript and subscript lookups, file and directory search, attribute copying between data frames. It has no dependencies to speak of and deliberately removed the one it had. In practice it is the shared substrate for its author's wider package family, and its source.all() function is maintained specifically to cooperate with the logr logging package.

Read the full common trajectory →

What is MetaboAnalystR?

The R engine behind MetaboAnalyst closes the gap from raw spectra to biological interpretation

MetaboAnalystR is the scriptable form of the MetaboAnalyst web platform, carrying several hundred functions for metabolomics data analysis, visualisation and functional interpretation. Its releases have steadily pushed the starting line further upstream: version 1 assumed processed data, version 2 added raw LC-MS spectral processing, and the 4.x line presents the whole path from raw spectra through compound identification to functional interpretation as one workflow. It also now claims exposomics alongside metabolomics as an application area.

Read the full MetaboAnalystR trajectory →

common vs MetaboAnalystR: editorial side-by-side

C
common
ANALYTICS
0.0

A base-R utility belt that grows one small function at a time, on no particular schedule

◆ Current state

common collects small helpers that base R leaves out — data frame labelling and sorting, infix operators for pasting and equality, UTF-8 superscript and subscript lookups, file and directory search, attribute copying between data frames. It has no dependencies to speak of and deliberately removed the one it had. In practice it is the shared substrate for its author's wider package family, and its source.all() function is maintained specifically to cooperate with the logr logging package.

◆ Where it's heading

The pattern is accretion rather than direction: each release adds a couple of utilities and fixes whatever the last batch broke, with gaps of a year or more between them. Function additions cluster around whatever the author's other packages needed at the time — file search, attribute preservation, group-boundary detection, script sourcing. The 2025 release continues exactly this, extending the infix comparison operators from equality alone to the full set of relational tests.

◆ Prediction

Expect more of the same shape — a handful of small helpers whenever a sibling package needs them — with no sign in these entries of a broader API push.

M0.0

The R engine behind MetaboAnalyst closes the gap from raw spectra to biological interpretation

◆ Current state

MetaboAnalystR is the scriptable form of the MetaboAnalyst web platform, carrying several hundred functions for metabolomics data analysis, visualisation and functional interpretation. Its releases have steadily pushed the starting line further upstream: version 1 assumed processed data, version 2 added raw LC-MS spectral processing, and the 4.x line presents the whole path from raw spectra through compound identification to functional interpretation as one workflow. It also now claims exposomics alongside metabolomics as an application area.

◆ Where it's heading

The consistent move is absorbing steps that users previously stitched together from separate tools. Peak picking, alignment and annotation came in with 2.0; automated feature detection optimisation and compound identification came with the 4.x work. The releases are infrequent and paper-shaped — each major version is announced with publication text rather than a change list — which makes the version history read as a sequence of methods papers more than a software cadence.

◆ Prediction

The exposomics framing is the newest element and the least built out in these entries, which makes it the most likely direction for the next round of work.

Alternatives to common and MetaboAnalystR

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either common or MetaboAnalystR.

See all common alternatives → · See all MetaboAnalystR alternatives →

Recent activity from common and MetaboAnalystR

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 8mo agocommonFull set of relational infix operators added
  2. 10mo agoMetaboAnalystRMetaboAnalystR 4.2: a unified LC-MS/MS workflow for global metabolomics and exposomics
  3. 2y agocommonsource.all() fixed to cooperate with logr
  4. 2y agocommonsource.all() added for sourcing a directory of scripts
  5. 2y agocommonchanged() fixed for single-value input
  6. 2y agocommonchanged() identifies grouping boundaries
  7. 3y agocommonthis.path() dependency removed
  8. 3y agoMetaboAnalystRMetaboAnalystR 3.3: Pre-version of version 4.0
  9. 7y agoMetaboAnalystRMetaboAnalystR 2.0: From Raw Spectra to Biological Insights
  10. 8y agoMetaboAnalystRInteractive 3D ordination plots via plotly

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between common and MetaboAnalystR?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. common and MetaboAnalystR are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is common better than MetaboAnalystR?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. common and MetaboAnalystR are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to common?

Top common alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "common alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/common for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to MetaboAnalystR?

Top MetaboAnalystR alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "MetaboAnalystR alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/metaboanalystr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.