← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

CMAQ vs RadialMR

A side-by-side editorial comparison of CMAQ and RadialMR — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

CMAQ vs RadialMR: at a glance

FeatureCMAQRadialMR
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesair-quality, atmospheric-modeling, epa, scientific-computingmendelian-randomization, radial-plots, correctness-audit, statistical-inference
Last editorial update1h ago6h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is CMAQ?

CMAQ went global in v5.5, and has been patching that surface ever since.

CMAQ is the EPA's Community Multiscale Air Quality modeling system, used for regulatory and research air quality simulation. Its release rhythm is strictly two-tier: numbered major versions carry new science and fresh benchmark datasets, while the x.y.z.n updates carry bug fixes against documentation and benchmarks that stay pinned to the parent version. The current line is v5.5, which introduced CRACMM2 chemistry and coupling to MPAS-A meteorology, followed by three patch rollups.

Read the full CMAQ trajectory →

What is RadialMR?

RadialMR's 2026 release corrects degrees of freedom that had been wrong since documentation.

RadialMR implements radial-plot formulations of IVW and MR-Egger Mendelian randomization, with outlier detection and interactive plotting. The recent history is thin on features and increasingly focused on the arithmetic: 1.2.4 in July 2026 fixes the degrees of freedom returned by egger_radial() to the documented n-2, corrects the heterogeneity p-value that inherited the same error, and repairs a negated lower bound in the random-effects bootstrap standard error search interval in ivw_radial().

Read the full RadialMR trajectory →

CMAQ vs RadialMR: editorial side-by-side

C
CMAQ
ANALYTICS
0.0

CMAQ went global in v5.5, and has been patching that surface ever since.

◆ Current state

CMAQ is the EPA's Community Multiscale Air Quality modeling system, used for regulatory and research air quality simulation. Its release rhythm is strictly two-tier: numbered major versions carry new science and fresh benchmark datasets, while the x.y.z.n updates carry bug fixes against documentation and benchmarks that stay pinned to the parent version. The current line is v5.5, which introduced CRACMM2 chemistry and coupling to MPAS-A meteorology, followed by three patch rollups.

◆ Where it's heading

The v5.5 patches cluster around the newest and most sensitive components. ISAM source apportionment and DDM-3D sensitivity analysis account for corrections in every one of the three updates, and CRACMM2 needed fixes within months of release. That is the expected shape after a major version lands: the science is stable, the instrumentation built on top of it is not. Parallel I/O work in the latest patch suggests the global configurations are now being run at scales that expose throughput limits.

◆ Prediction

The next major version will fold these fixes in with new science, documentation and benchmark data — the release notes state this explicitly each time. Until then, expect further ISAM and DDM-3D corrections, which have appeared in every patch so far.

R
RadialMR
ANALYTICS
0.0

RadialMR's 2026 release corrects degrees of freedom that had been wrong since documentation.

◆ Current state

RadialMR implements radial-plot formulations of IVW and MR-Egger Mendelian randomization, with outlier detection and interactive plotting. The recent history is thin on features and increasingly focused on the arithmetic: 1.2.4 in July 2026 fixes the degrees of freedom returned by egger_radial() to the documented n-2, corrects the heterogeneity p-value that inherited the same error, and repairs a negated lower bound in the random-effects bootstrap standard error search interval in ivw_radial().

◆ Where it's heading

This is a package being read closely by its maintainer rather than extended. The 1.2.x line pairs statistical corrections with defensive hardening — an rmr_format class check so unformatted input fails with a clear message, and plotly_radial() dispatching on object class instead of counting list elements. Both are the kind of change made while auditing, not while building.

◆ Prediction

Expect the audit to continue into the remaining estimator internals and print methods rather than new radial variants; the entries show no feature work queued.

Alternatives to CMAQ and RadialMR

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either CMAQ or RadialMR.

See all CMAQ alternatives → · See all RadialMR alternatives →

Recent activity from CMAQ and RadialMR

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agoRadialMRegger_radial() degrees of freedom corrected to n-2
  2. 3mo agoRadialMRroxygen2 bumped; package-level helpfile added
  3. 4mo agoRadialMRUnspecified codebase optimizations
  4. 1y agoRadialMRggplot2 v4 warning removed from plot_radial()
  5. 1y agoCMAQCMAQ 5.5.0.3 enables parallel I/O, fixes DDM-3D control files
  6. 1y agoCMAQCMAQ 5.5.0.2 corrects ISAM aerosol and cloud processing
  7. 1y agoCMAQCMAQ 5.5.0.1 fixes SAPRC mechanism runs and NLCD mapping
  8. 1y agoCMAQCMAQ 5.5 adds global simulation coupled to MPAS-A
  9. 1y agoCMAQCMAQ 5.4.0.5: minor ELMO output fixes
  10. 2y agoCMAQCMAQ 5.4.0.4 fixes RBSTATS under ROS3, corrects a molecular weight

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between CMAQ and RadialMR?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. CMAQ and RadialMR are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is CMAQ better than RadialMR?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. CMAQ and RadialMR are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to CMAQ?

Top CMAQ alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "CMAQ alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/cmaq for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to RadialMR?

Top RadialMR alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "RadialMR alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/radialmr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.