← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

CMAQ vs modeltime.resample

A side-by-side editorial comparison of CMAQ and modeltime.resample — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

CMAQ vs modeltime.resample: at a glance

FeatureCMAQmodeltime.resample
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesair-quality, atmospheric-modeling, epa, scientific-computingtime series, cross-validation, tidymodels, compatibility maintenance
Last editorial update1h ago9h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is CMAQ?

CMAQ went global in v5.5, and has been patching that surface ever since.

CMAQ is the EPA's Community Multiscale Air Quality modeling system, used for regulatory and research air quality simulation. Its release rhythm is strictly two-tier: numbered major versions carry new science and fresh benchmark datasets, while the x.y.z.n updates carry bug fixes against documentation and benchmarks that stay pinned to the parent version. The current line is v5.5, which introduced CRACMM2 chemistry and coupling to MPAS-A meteorology, followed by three patch rollups.

Read the full CMAQ trajectory →

What is modeltime.resample?

modeltime.resample exists to keep backtesting working as tidymodels shifts underneath it.

modeltime.resample runs time series cross-validation over modeltime models, returning per-resample predictions and accuracy plots. Version 0.3.0 is the substantive release in view: tune 2.0.0 compatibility, deterministic seeding via withr, guaranteed .predictions output, and clearer failures when resample fits break. The three releases before it are dependency chores.

Read the full modeltime.resample trajectory →

CMAQ vs modeltime.resample: editorial side-by-side

C
CMAQ
ANALYTICS
0.0

CMAQ went global in v5.5, and has been patching that surface ever since.

◆ Current state

CMAQ is the EPA's Community Multiscale Air Quality modeling system, used for regulatory and research air quality simulation. Its release rhythm is strictly two-tier: numbered major versions carry new science and fresh benchmark datasets, while the x.y.z.n updates carry bug fixes against documentation and benchmarks that stay pinned to the parent version. The current line is v5.5, which introduced CRACMM2 chemistry and coupling to MPAS-A meteorology, followed by three patch rollups.

◆ Where it's heading

The v5.5 patches cluster around the newest and most sensitive components. ISAM source apportionment and DDM-3D sensitivity analysis account for corrections in every one of the three updates, and CRACMM2 needed fixes within months of release. That is the expected shape after a major version lands: the science is stable, the instrumentation built on top of it is not. Parallel I/O work in the latest patch suggests the global configurations are now being run at scales that expose throughput limits.

◆ Prediction

The next major version will fold these fixes in with new science, documentation and benchmark data — the release notes state this explicitly each time. Until then, expect further ISAM and DDM-3D corrections, which have appeared in every patch so far.

M0.0

modeltime.resample exists to keep backtesting working as tidymodels shifts underneath it.

◆ Current state

modeltime.resample runs time series cross-validation over modeltime models, returning per-resample predictions and accuracy plots. Version 0.3.0 is the substantive release in view: tune 2.0.0 compatibility, deterministic seeding via withr, guaranteed .predictions output, and clearer failures when resample fits break. The three releases before it are dependency chores.

◆ Where it's heading

Every entry here is compatibility work against something upstream — hardhat 1.0.0, workflows regression mode, then tune 2.0.0 twice. The 0.3.0 notes show a second concern emerging alongside it: making failures legible, with .notes on failed fits, actionable errors from unnest_modeltime_resamples(), and fallback logic when prediction columns go missing across versions. Reproducibility gets the same treatment through explicit seeding.

◆ Prediction

Expect the next release to track the next tidymodels breaking change, with any new work continuing on error reporting rather than resampling strategies.

Alternatives to CMAQ and modeltime.resample

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either CMAQ or modeltime.resample.

See all CMAQ alternatives → · See all modeltime.resample alternatives →

Recent activity from CMAQ and modeltime.resample

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 11mo agomodeltime.resampletune 2.0 support, deterministic seeding, clearer errors
  2. 11mo agomodeltime.resampleDependency cleanup ahead of the next tune release
  3. 1y agoCMAQCMAQ 5.5.0.3 enables parallel I/O, fixes DDM-3D control files
  4. 1y agoCMAQCMAQ 5.5.0.2 corrects ISAM aerosol and cloud processing
  5. 1y agoCMAQCMAQ 5.5.0.1 fixes SAPRC mechanism runs and NLCD mapping
  6. 1y agoCMAQCMAQ 5.5 adds global simulation coupled to MPAS-A
  7. 1y agoCMAQCMAQ 5.4.0.5: minor ELMO output fixes
  8. 2y agoCMAQCMAQ 5.4.0.4 fixes RBSTATS under ROS3, corrects a molecular weight
  9. 3y agomodeltime.resampleFixes workflows in regression mode
  10. 4y agomodeltime.resampleUpdates for hardhat 1.0.0

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between CMAQ and modeltime.resample?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. CMAQ and modeltime.resample are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is CMAQ better than modeltime.resample?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. CMAQ and modeltime.resample are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to CMAQ?

Top CMAQ alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "CMAQ alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/cmaq for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to modeltime.resample?

Top modeltime.resample alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "modeltime.resample alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/modeltime-resample for the full list with editorial commentary on each.