← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

CMAQ vs ggsci

A side-by-side editorial comparison of CMAQ and ggsci — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

CMAQ vs ggsci: at a glance

FeatureCMAQggsci
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.02.5
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesair-quality, atmospheric-modeling, epa, scientific-computingcolor palettes, ggplot2, r, data visualization
Last editorial update1h ago8h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is CMAQ?

CMAQ went global in v5.5, and has been patching that surface ever since.

CMAQ is the EPA's Community Multiscale Air Quality modeling system, used for regulatory and research air quality simulation. Its release rhythm is strictly two-tier: numbered major versions carry new science and fresh benchmark datasets, while the x.y.z.n updates carry bug fixes against documentation and benchmarks that stay pinned to the parent version. The current line is v5.5, which introduced CRACMM2 chemistry and coupling to MPAS-A meteorology, followed by three patch rollups.

Read the full CMAQ trajectory →

What is ggsci?

ggsci quietly became a palette mirror, then taught itself to generate colors on demand

ggsci ships ready-made ggplot2 color scales, originally journal and sci-fi palettes and now overwhelmingly terminal themes — the iTerm collection has grown past 400 entries and picks up 30 to 70 more with each sync. The one structural change in the recent run is gephi_palettes(), which generates distinct categorical colors for an arbitrary number of levels rather than serving a fixed list. Release cadence is steady, roughly every six to eight weeks.

Read the full ggsci trajectory →

CMAQ vs ggsci: editorial side-by-side

C
CMAQ
ANALYTICS
0.0

CMAQ went global in v5.5, and has been patching that surface ever since.

◆ Current state

CMAQ is the EPA's Community Multiscale Air Quality modeling system, used for regulatory and research air quality simulation. Its release rhythm is strictly two-tier: numbered major versions carry new science and fresh benchmark datasets, while the x.y.z.n updates carry bug fixes against documentation and benchmarks that stay pinned to the parent version. The current line is v5.5, which introduced CRACMM2 chemistry and coupling to MPAS-A meteorology, followed by three patch rollups.

◆ Where it's heading

The v5.5 patches cluster around the newest and most sensitive components. ISAM source apportionment and DDM-3D sensitivity analysis account for corrections in every one of the three updates, and CRACMM2 needed fixes within months of release. That is the expected shape after a major version lands: the science is stable, the instrumentation built on top of it is not. Parallel I/O work in the latest patch suggests the global configurations are now being run at scales that expose throughput limits.

◆ Prediction

The next major version will fold these fixes in with new science, documentation and benchmark data — the release notes state this explicitly each time. Until then, expect further ISAM and DDM-3D corrections, which have appeared in every patch so far.

G
ggsci
ANALYTICS
2.5

ggsci quietly became a palette mirror, then taught itself to generate colors on demand

◆ Current state

ggsci ships ready-made ggplot2 color scales, originally journal and sci-fi palettes and now overwhelmingly terminal themes — the iTerm collection has grown past 400 entries and picks up 30 to 70 more with each sync. The one structural change in the recent run is gephi_palettes(), which generates distinct categorical colors for an arbitrary number of levels rather than serving a fixed list. Release cadence is steady, roughly every six to eight weeks.

◆ Where it's heading

Two threads run in parallel. The larger one is curation: ggsci has effectively become a distribution channel for upstream color work, adding design-system palettes (Primer, Atlassian, Bootstrap, Tailwind) and re-syncing iTerm as that project changes, including correcting existing color values when upstream moves. The smaller and more interesting one is generation — the Gephi engine sidesteps the ceiling every fixed palette has, which is what happens when a plot needs more categories than any curated set provides.

◆ Prediction

Given how much of the release notes each cycle is a mechanical upstream sync, the plausible next step is automating those syncs rather than adding another vendor palette by hand; the Gephi generator is the more likely place any genuinely new capability appears.

Alternatives to CMAQ and ggsci

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either CMAQ or ggsci.

See all CMAQ alternatives → · See all ggsci alternatives →

Recent activity from CMAQ and ggsci

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 16d agoggsciggsci 5.2.0
  2. 1mo agoggsciggsci 5.1.0
  3. 4mo agoggsciggsci 5.0.0 generates categorical colors instead of serving a fixed list
  4. 4mo agoggsciggsci 4.3.0
  5. 8mo agoggsciggsci 4.2.0
  6. 9mo agoggsciggsci 4.1.0
  7. 1y agoCMAQCMAQ 5.5.0.3 enables parallel I/O, fixes DDM-3D control files
  8. 1y agoCMAQCMAQ 5.5.0.2 corrects ISAM aerosol and cloud processing
  9. 1y agoCMAQCMAQ 5.5.0.1 fixes SAPRC mechanism runs and NLCD mapping
  10. 1y agoCMAQCMAQ 5.5 adds global simulation coupled to MPAS-A
  11. 1y agoCMAQCMAQ 5.4.0.5: minor ELMO output fixes
  12. 2y agoCMAQCMAQ 5.4.0.4 fixes RBSTATS under ROS3, corrects a molecular weight

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between CMAQ and ggsci?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. ggsci is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is CMAQ better than ggsci?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. ggsci is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to CMAQ?

Top CMAQ alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "CMAQ alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/cmaq for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to ggsci?

Top ggsci alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ggsci alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ggsci for the full list with editorial commentary on each.