tidytlg
A tables-listings-graphs package that reached CRAN and then went quiet.
Comparison · Analytics
cloudml vs webmockr
A side-by-side editorial comparison of cloudml and webmockr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
cloudml vs webmockr: at a glance
What is cloudml?
Six years since the last functional change, and Google renamed the service it wraps in the release before that
cloudml lets R users train keras, tfestimators and tensorflow models on Google's managed machine learning service, tune hyperparameters there, and deploy the results. Its last release with functional content was 0.6.1 in September 2019, which adapted to Google renaming the service from ml-engine to ai-platform. The only entry since is a 2025 documentation update made to satisfy CRAN.
What is webmockr?
The stubbing library added httr2 support, then spent a year cutting itself free of everything else
webmockr intercepts HTTP requests in R tests and returns stubbed responses, and since 1.0.0 it covers all three clients that matter — httr, httr2 and crul. The releases through 2025 have been about shedding dependencies: internal R6 classes unexported in 2.1.0, crul demoted from Imports to Suggests in the same release, and the mutual dependency with vcr severed in 2.2.0. The package now installs and runs without pulling in the rest of the rOpenSci HTTP stack.
cloudml vs webmockr: editorial side-by-side
cloudml
0.0ANALYTICS
Six years since the last functional change, and Google renamed the service it wraps in the release before that
◆ Current state
cloudml lets R users train keras, tfestimators and tensorflow models on Google's managed machine learning service, tune hyperparameters there, and deploy the results. Its last release with functional content was 0.6.1 in September 2019, which adapted to Google renaming the service from ml-engine to ai-platform. The only entry since is a 2025 documentation update made to satisfy CRAN.
◆ Where it's heading
The visible arc is short and stops abruptly. Releases through 2018 tracked the TensorFlow runtime version and patched packaging problems; 0.6.1 added a customCommands hook so users could run OS-level setup before package installation, and adjusted to the service's new name. Then nothing for six years. A 2025 release containing only documentation changes is the standard signal of a package being kept on CRAN rather than being developed.
◆ Prediction
There is nothing in this feed to support a prediction of functional work. The most likely next event is another CRAN-driven documentation patch, or archival.
webmockr
0.0ANALYTICS
The stubbing library added httr2 support, then spent a year cutting itself free of everything else
◆ Current state
webmockr intercepts HTTP requests in R tests and returns stubbed responses, and since 1.0.0 it covers all three clients that matter — httr, httr2 and crul. The releases through 2025 have been about shedding dependencies: internal R6 classes unexported in 2.1.0, crul demoted from Imports to Suggests in the same release, and the mutual dependency with vcr severed in 2.2.0. The package now installs and runs without pulling in the rest of the rOpenSci HTTP stack.
◆ Where it's heading
Two arcs run in sequence. The first is coverage — multiple queued responses in 0.7.0, basic auth mocking, async through crul, then httr2 — building out what can be stubbed. The second, starting with 2.0.0, is correctness and independence: stubs are now deleted if an error occurs mid-construction rather than lingering half-built, partial matching arrives for bodies and queries, and the dependency graph is pruned release by release. The 2.2.0 split from vcr landed within a minute of crul's release taking mocking control into its own clients.
◆ Prediction
RequestPattern is documented as still exported in 2.1.0 but slated for removal, so the next major release is where that lands. Expect continued dependency pruning rather than new client support — the three clients that exist are already covered.
Alternatives to cloudml and webmockr
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either cloudml or webmockr.
Tplyr
Tplyr made clinical summary tables explain where every number came from.
rlistings
Clinical listings that keep inheriting their hardest problem — pagination — from the layer below.
hoardr
A cache-directory helper that has shipped nothing but CRAN-triggered patches for seven years.
gigs
gigs redesigned its whole conversion API for rOpenSci, then spent three releases getting the docs to build.
riem
A weather-data client that keeps rewriting its HTTP layer while slowly tightening its API.
See all cloudml alternatives → · See all webmockr alternatives →
Recent activity from cloudml and webmockr
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 0y agocloudmlDocumentation updated for CRAN
- 1y agowebmockrvcr dependency severed
- 1y agowebmockrInternal classes unexported; crul becomes an optional dependency
- 1y agowebmockrFailed stub construction cleans up; partial matching extends to bodies and queries
- 2y agowebmockrhttr2 joins httr and crul as a supported client ⚡
- 3y agowebmockrQueued responses, body matching and integer status codes fixed
- 3y agowebmockrRegex URI matching fixed
- 6y agocloudmlai-platform command adopted; custom pre-install commands added
- 7y agocloudmlDefault runtime moves to TensorFlow 1.9
- 8y agocloudmlPatch for CRAN results and a packrat error
- 8y agocloudmlCloud training, GPU jobs, tuning and deployment from R
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between cloudml and webmockr?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. cloudml and webmockr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is cloudml better than webmockr?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. cloudml and webmockr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to cloudml?
Top cloudml alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "cloudml alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/cloudml for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to webmockr?
Top webmockr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "webmockr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/webmockr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.