tidytlg
A tables-listings-graphs package that reached CRAN and then went quiet.
A side-by-side editorial comparison of cloudml and ijtiff — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Six years since the last functional change, and Google renamed the service it wraps in the release before that
cloudml lets R users train keras, tfestimators and tensorflow models on Google's managed machine learning service, tune hyperparameters there, and deploy the results. Its last release with functional content was 0.6.1 in September 2019, which adapted to Google renaming the service from ml-engine to ai-platform. The only entry since is a 2025 documentation update made to satisfy CRAN.
A TIFF reader for scientific imaging that spent its recent releases shedding weight and fixing memory bugs.
ijtiff reads and writes TIFF files the way ImageJ writes them, which ordinary R TIFF readers get wrong — multi-channel, multi-frame, and unusual bit depths. The 3.1.x line is dominated by memory correctness in the C tag-handling layer, alongside dropping the large imager dependency from the display path. Cadence is sporadic, with multi-year gaps.
cloudml lets R users train keras, tfestimators and tensorflow models on Google's managed machine learning service, tune hyperparameters there, and deploy the results. Its last release with functional content was 0.6.1 in September 2019, which adapted to Google renaming the service from ml-engine to ai-platform. The only entry since is a 2025 documentation update made to satisfy CRAN.
The visible arc is short and stops abruptly. Releases through 2018 tracked the TensorFlow runtime version and patched packaging problems; 0.6.1 added a customCommands hook so users could run OS-level setup before package installation, and adjusted to the service's new name. Then nothing for six years. A 2025 release containing only documentation changes is the standard signal of a package being kept on CRAN rather than being developed.
There is nothing in this feed to support a prediction of functional work. The most likely next event is another CRAN-driven documentation patch, or archival.
ijtiff reads and writes TIFF files the way ImageJ writes them, which ordinary R TIFF readers get wrong — multi-channel, multi-frame, and unusual bit depths. The 3.1.x line is dominated by memory correctness in the C tag-handling layer, alongside dropping the large imager dependency from the display path. Cadence is sporadic, with multi-year gaps.
Two threads run through the window. The C layer is being hardened — memory leaks in tag handling, buffer cleanup, PROTECT errors, validation of malformed files — which is the kind of work that surfaces when a package gets run against real-world files at volume. Separately, the R layer is shedding dependencies, with base graphics replacing imager for display. Both make the package cheaper and safer to depend on rather than more capable.
Expect continued C-level correctness work rather than format features, since three of the last three substantive releases were memory or compiler fixes.
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either cloudml or ijtiff.
A tables-listings-graphs package that reached CRAN and then went quiet.
Tplyr made clinical summary tables explain where every number came from.
Clinical listings that keep inheriting their hardest problem — pagination — from the layer below.
A cache-directory helper that has shipped nothing but CRAN-triggered patches for seven years.
gigs redesigned its whole conversion API for rOpenSci, then spent three releases getting the docs to build.
A weather-data client that keeps rewriting its HTTP layer while slowly tightening its API.
See all cloudml alternatives → · See all ijtiff alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. cloudml and ijtiff are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. cloudml and ijtiff are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
Top cloudml alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "cloudml alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/cloudml for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top ijtiff alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ijtiff alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ijtiff for the full list with editorial commentary on each.