qqman
The Manhattan-plot package for GWAS results, finished and dormant since 2017.
Comparison · Analytics
climaemet vs constants
A side-by-side editorial comparison of climaemet and constants — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
climaemet vs constants: at a glance
What is climaemet?
climaemet added weather alerts and wildfire risk, then spent two years managing rate limits.
climaemet wraps Spain's AEMET meteorological API — station data, historical climate series, forecasts, and the plotting helpers that go with them. Its capability surface widened decisively in 1.4.0 with meteorological alerts and wildfire risk rasters. Everything since has been about surviving the API rather than extending it: multiple API keys, quota-aware key selection, and httr2 throttling pinned to AEMET's stated 40-connections-per-minute policy.
What is constants?
The R package for CODATA constants rebuilt its symbol table on NIST's naming so future updates stop being hand work.
constants exposes the CODATA recommended values of the physical constants to R, as a data frame plus symbol lists that carry units, uncertainties, or both. The package reached 1.0.0 on the 2018 CODATA release and has shipped once since, purely to track a units package update. Its surface is small and its release cadence is bound to CODATA, which revises every few years.
climaemet vs constants: editorial side-by-side
climaemet
0.0ANALYTICS
climaemet added weather alerts and wildfire risk, then spent two years managing rate limits.
◆ Current state
climaemet wraps Spain's AEMET meteorological API — station data, historical climate series, forecasts, and the plotting helpers that go with them. Its capability surface widened decisively in 1.4.0 with meteorological alerts and wildfire risk rasters. Everything since has been about surviving the API rather than extending it: multiple API keys, quota-aware key selection, and httr2 throttling pinned to AEMET's stated 40-connections-per-minute policy.
◆ Where it's heading
Two forces shape this package, and neither is feature demand. The first is AEMET's own churn — new response codes, a fires endpoint that switched to six risk levels returned as named factors, municipality datasets refreshed annually. The second is the maintainer's cross-package modernization, visible here as the API key store moving to tools::R_user_dir() with automatic migration, a configurable timeout, cli messaging, and an R 4.1 floor. The 1.6.0 refactor is stated as AI-assisted, matching the maintainer's other packages.
◆ Prediction
Expect the next release to track another AEMET endpoint change rather than add a data domain; the throttling and multi-key machinery suggests quota pressure is the constraint the maintainer keeps returning to.
constants
0.0ANALYTICS
The R package for CODATA constants rebuilt its symbol table on NIST's naming so future updates stop being hand work.
◆ Current state
constants exposes the CODATA recommended values of the physical constants to R, as a data frame plus symbol lists that carry units, uncertainties, or both. The package reached 1.0.0 on the 2018 CODATA release and has shipped once since, purely to track a units package update. Its surface is small and its release cadence is bound to CODATA, which revises every few years.
◆ Where it's heading
The direction set at 1.0.0 was to stop being a curated convenience wrapper and become a mechanical mirror of NIST. Hand-crafted symbol names were replaced with NIST's own ASCII symbols, categories adopted NIST's, and uncertainty switched from relative to absolute — all framed by the maintainer as necessary to make future CODATA updates routine. On top of that the package gained a correlation matrix and optional integration with the quantities package, moving it from a lookup table toward something that can propagate uncertainty.
◆ Prediction
Having rebuilt the symbol table specifically so CODATA revisions become mechanical, the next substantive release most likely tracks a new CODATA dataset rather than adding API. The experimental correlated-value support, disabled by default at 1.0.0, is the one part these entries flag as unfinished.
Alternatives to climaemet and constants
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either climaemet or constants.
austraits
The R client for AusTraits spends its releases chasing the dataset it reads.
ggdemetra
A ggplot2 layer for seasonal adjustment output, filling in one plot type at a time.
fossilsim
A fossil-record simulator that quietly grew a trait-evolution engine.
tern.rbmi
Reference-based multiple imputation tables, shipping only what CRAN checks demand.
tern.mmrm
An MMRM tabulation package that has published nothing since its 2024 CRAN releases.
See all climaemet alternatives → · See all constants alternatives →
Recent activity from climaemet and constants
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 2mo agoclimaemetAPI keys move to R_user_dir; fire risk returns named factors
- 4mo agoclimaemetVignettes migrated to Quarto
- 7mo agoclimaemetRequest throttling pinned to AEMET's 40-per-minute policy
- 1y agoclimaemetggwindrose rebuilt on coord_radial
- 1y agoclimaemetHighest-quota API key now chosen per call
- 1y agoclimaemetWeather alerts and wildfire risk rasters added ⚡
- 5y agoconstantsCompatibility fix for units 0.7-0
- 5y agoconstantsconstants 1.0.0 ⚡
- 8y agoconstantsUnit handling fixes ahead of the 1.0.0 rebuild
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between climaemet and constants?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. climaemet and constants are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is climaemet better than constants?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. climaemet and constants are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to climaemet?
Top climaemet alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "climaemet alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/climaemet for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to constants?
Top constants alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "constants alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/constants-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.