← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

cleanepi vs webchem

A side-by-side editorial comparison of cleanepi and webchem — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

cleanepi vs webchem: at a glance

Featurecleanepiwebchem
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesepiverse-trace, data-cleaning, line-list, reportingcheminformatics, web-apis, data-access, ropensci
Last editorial update4h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is cleanepi?

cleanepi is in the long tail of bug fixes that follows a 1.0 — and changed maintainers along the way.

cleanepi cleans and standardises epidemiological line list data — dates, subject IDs, missing values, duplicates — and produces a report of what it changed. Since 1.0.0 in mid-2024 the releases have been almost entirely corrective: date-guesser fixes, report structure fixes and matching behaviour corrections. Maintainership passed to Bubacarr Bah in 1.1.2.

Read the full cleanepi trajectory →

What is webchem?

Adding chemical databases with one hand while public ones close programmatic access with the other.

webchem is the R interface to public chemical data — retrieving identifiers, properties and structures across roughly a dozen web services. Its release history reads as a running account of which of those services still allow automated access. Version 1.3.0 removed two functions outright because their sources withdrew: ChemIDplus was retired by the NLM, and PAN stopped supporting programmatic access. Version 1.3.1 continues the pattern, updating URLs that stopped working and noting that ChemSpider InChIKey validation now requires an API key like the rest of that provider's endpoints.

Read the full webchem trajectory →

cleanepi vs webchem: editorial side-by-side

C
cleanepi
ANALYTICS
0.0

cleanepi is in the long tail of bug fixes that follows a 1.0 — and changed maintainers along the way.

◆ Current state

cleanepi cleans and standardises epidemiological line list data — dates, subject IDs, missing values, duplicates — and produces a report of what it changed. Since 1.0.0 in mid-2024 the releases have been almost entirely corrective: date-guesser fixes, report structure fixes and matching behaviour corrections. Maintainership passed to Bubacarr Bah in 1.1.2.

◆ Where it's heading

Work has concentrated on the report object and on making the cleaning functions behave predictably at the edges — case- and whitespace-insensitive missing-value matching, report elements returned as vectors instead of comma-separated strings, an argument to print a single operation's report. The underlying cleaning API has barely moved since 1.0.0, which suggests it is settled.

◆ Prediction

The report interface has been reworked repeatedly across these releases and is the most likely place for further change; the cleaning functions themselves look stable.

W
webchem
ANALYTICS
0.0

Adding chemical databases with one hand while public ones close programmatic access with the other.

◆ Current state

webchem is the R interface to public chemical data — retrieving identifiers, properties and structures across roughly a dozen web services. Its release history reads as a running account of which of those services still allow automated access. Version 1.3.0 removed two functions outright because their sources withdrew: ChemIDplus was retired by the NLM, and PAN stopped supporting programmatic access. Version 1.3.1 continues the pattern, updating URLs that stopped working and noting that ChemSpider InChIKey validation now requires an API key like the rest of that provider's endpoints.

◆ Where it's heading

Two opposing forces run through these entries. The package keeps widening its coverage — ChEMBL in 1.2.0, LIPID MAPS and SwissLipids identifiers via Wikidata, structure images, Mol export — while the open, unauthenticated end of the chemical web keeps contracting. The other consistent thread is interface harmonisation: successive releases have converged the get_* functions on the same query and from arguments, tibble returns, and CAS reformatting, so the package feels like one interface rather than a dozen wrappers.

◆ Prediction

Expect further defunct functions and URL repairs as more providers move behind keys or shut down, alongside occasional additions of sources that remain open. The entries show no sign of a general credential-management layer, which is what a package facing this trend would eventually need.

Alternatives to cleanepi and webchem

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either cleanepi or webchem.

See all cleanepi alternatives → · See all webchem alternatives →

Recent activity from cleanepi and webchem

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 9mo agocleanepiCase-insensitive missing-value matching and report fixes
  2. 1y agowebchemRepairs broken URLs; ChemSpider check now needs a key
  3. 1y agocleanepiReport elements become vectors; date parsing default restored
  4. 1y agocleanepiDate guesser corrected; empty-row indices fixed
  5. 2y agocleanepiFirst major release with cleaning and reporting
  6. 3y agowebchemChemIDplus and PAN queries removed as sources shut down
  7. 3y agowebchemAdds ChEMBL access for bioactive compound data
  8. 4y agowebchemcir_query() returns a tibble, a breaking change
  9. 4y agowebchemAdds Mol structure export; aw_query renamed to bcpc_query
  10. 5y agowebchemFetches LIPID MAPS and SwissLipids identifiers from Wikidata

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between cleanepi and webchem?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. cleanepi and webchem are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is cleanepi better than webchem?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. cleanepi and webchem are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to cleanepi?

Top cleanepi alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "cleanepi alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/cleanepi for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to webchem?

Top webchem alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "webchem alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/webchem for the full list with editorial commentary on each.