← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

CHNOSZ vs crandep

A side-by-side editorial comparison of CHNOSZ and crandep — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

CHNOSZ vs crandep: at a glance

FeatureCHNOSZcrandep
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesgeochemistry, thermodynamics, phase-diagrams, r-packagecran, dependency-network, power-law, mcmc
Last editorial update1h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is CHNOSZ?

A geochemistry thermodynamics engine that changed its units and its database schema in one release.

CHNOSZ computes thermodynamic properties and phase diagrams for geochemical systems, backed by OBIGT, its bundled thermodynamic database. It releases roughly once a year with a short highlights note pointing at a full changelog elsewhere. Since the 2.0.0 reset, work has been curation and communication: new species in OBIGT, a FAQ vignette, a rewritten introduction, and more readable diagram labels.

Read the full CHNOSZ trajectory →

What is crandep?

Half CRAN dependency scraper, half extreme-value modelling kit — and the scraper half keeps finding bugs.

crandep does two jobs that rarely share a package: it harvests the CRAN dependency network, and it fits power-law and extreme-value mixture models to the resulting degree distributions. The 2024 releases were all model work — profile posteriors, wrappers, a constrained variant, a TZP-power-law mixture between the two- and three-component models. The 2025 releases are entirely the other half, fixing what the harvester was silently getting wrong.

Read the full crandep trajectory →

CHNOSZ vs crandep: editorial side-by-side

C
CHNOSZ
INFRA · APIS
0.0

A geochemistry thermodynamics engine that changed its units and its database schema in one release.

◆ Current state

CHNOSZ computes thermodynamic properties and phase diagrams for geochemical systems, backed by OBIGT, its bundled thermodynamic database. It releases roughly once a year with a short highlights note pointing at a full changelog elsewhere. Since the 2.0.0 reset, work has been curation and communication: new species in OBIGT, a FAQ vignette, a rewritten introduction, and more readable diagram labels.

◆ Where it's heading

2.0.0 was the structural break — Joules replacing calories as the default output of subcrt(), a required E_units column, a new model column, and the removal of a legacy scaling convention for heat-capacity coefficients. Everything since has built on that settled foundation rather than disturbing it. The direction of the last two releases is toward coverage of specific mineral systems, rare earths and uranyl among them, and toward making the package approachable, which suggests a maintainer courting new users rather than reworking the engine.

◆ Prediction

The next release most likely continues OBIGT curation for particular element systems plus vignette work; the highlights format gives no signal of engine-level changes pending.

C
crandep
INFRA · APIS
0.0

Half CRAN dependency scraper, half extreme-value modelling kit — and the scraper half keeps finding bugs.

◆ Current state

crandep does two jobs that rarely share a package: it harvests the CRAN dependency network, and it fits power-law and extreme-value mixture models to the resulting degree distributions. The 2024 releases were all model work — profile posteriors, wrappers, a constrained variant, a TZP-power-law mixture between the two- and three-component models. The 2025 releases are entirely the other half, fixing what the harvester was silently getting wrong.

◆ Where it's heading

The modelling side has settled into a family of mixtures with matching wrapper and profile-posterior functions, and has not gained a new component since mid-2024. Attention has shifted to data quality in the scraper, where two consecutive releases dealt with the same class of problem: rows that should not exist because of trailing commas in CRAN's own metadata, and rows that should exist but did not because orphan packages have no edges. For a package whose science is degree distributions, missing isolated nodes is a modelling error, not a formatting one.

◆ Prediction

Expect further hardening against CRAN metadata quirks in the harvesting functions; the mixture-model side looks feature-complete and is likely to stay quiet unless a new component model is published.

Alternatives to CHNOSZ and crandep

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either CHNOSZ or crandep.

See all CHNOSZ alternatives → · See all crandep alternatives →

Recent activity from CHNOSZ and crandep

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1y agocrandepDependency harvest split in two so orphan packages stop disappearing
  2. 1y agoCHNOSZOBIGT gains rare earth and uranyl species; intro vignette rewritten
  3. 1y agocrandepTrailing commas in CRAN metadata no longer produce empty-name rows
  4. 2y agocrandepConstrained two-component mixture with continuity at the threshold
  5. 2y agocrandepArgument names normalised to x_max; MCMC wrapper defaults set
  6. 2y agoCHNOSZMosaic diagrams accept grouped basis species as variables
  7. 2y agocrandepTZP-power-law mixture fills the gap between the 2- and 3-component models
  8. 2y agocrandepProfile posteriors and chained MCMC wrappers for the mixture models
  9. 3y agoCHNOSZJoules become the default and the OBIGT schema is rebuilt

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between CHNOSZ and crandep?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Infra & APIs. CHNOSZ and crandep are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is CHNOSZ better than crandep?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. CHNOSZ and crandep are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to CHNOSZ?

Top CHNOSZ alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "CHNOSZ alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/chnosz for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to crandep?

Top crandep alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "crandep alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/crandep for the full list with editorial commentary on each.