datefixR
The messy-date parser rewrote its core in Rust and came out 300x faster.
Comparison · Analytics
charlatan vs dfms
A side-by-side editorial comparison of charlatan and dfms — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:ropensci
charlatan vs dfms: at a glance
What is charlatan?
R's fake-data generator rebuilt its provider hierarchy so contributors can add one locale without touching the rest.
charlatan generates realistic fake data — names, addresses, phone numbers, jobs, internet artefacts — across many locales, following the same model as faker in Python and Perl. The 0.6.1 release reworked the provider class hierarchy so locale-specific providers inherit from a parent, and 0.6.2 since has been a documentation rebuild that happened to surface a duplicate Norwegian phone number pattern. Activity is sparse and bursty.
What is dfms?
Peer-reviewed, feature-complete, and now able to hand its models to other forecasting engines.
dfms estimates dynamic factor models in R, the workhorse for nowcasting economic activity from ragged, mixed-frequency data. The package worked through the Banbura and Modugno (2014) specification in stages — quarterly variables in 0.3.0, AR(1) idiosyncratic errors combined with mixed frequency in 0.4.0 — then declared 1.0.0 feature-complete on completing rOpenSci peer review, adding news decomposition to attribute forecast revisions to specific data releases. Version 1.0.1 adds convert(), which exports fitted models to dlm or KFAS state-space objects.
charlatan vs dfms: editorial side-by-side
charlatan
0.0ANALYTICS
R's fake-data generator rebuilt its provider hierarchy so contributors can add one locale without touching the rest.
◆ Current state
charlatan generates realistic fake data — names, addresses, phone numbers, jobs, internet artefacts — across many locales, following the same model as faker in Python and Perl. The 0.6.1 release reworked the provider class hierarchy so locale-specific providers inherit from a parent, and 0.6.2 since has been a documentation rebuild that happened to surface a duplicate Norwegian phone number pattern. Activity is sparse and bursty.
◆ Where it's heading
The package's value scales with locale coverage, and its releases track that: early versions added data-type providers, middle versions added locales one contributor at a time, and 0.6.1 attacked the bottleneck by restructuring the class hierarchy so a locale can override a single function. Development has effectively been handed to contributors, with maintainer releases reduced to docs rebuilds and CRAN compliance.
◆ Prediction
Expect the next substantive release to be an accumulation of contributed locales and providers arriving through the new parent-provider structure, rather than maintainer-driven feature work.
dfms
0.0ANALYTICS
Peer-reviewed, feature-complete, and now able to hand its models to other forecasting engines.
◆ Current state
dfms estimates dynamic factor models in R, the workhorse for nowcasting economic activity from ragged, mixed-frequency data. The package worked through the Banbura and Modugno (2014) specification in stages — quarterly variables in 0.3.0, AR(1) idiosyncratic errors combined with mixed frequency in 0.4.0 — then declared 1.0.0 feature-complete on completing rOpenSci peer review, adding news decomposition to attribute forecast revisions to specific data releases. Version 1.0.1 adds convert(), which exports fitted models to dlm or KFAS state-space objects.
◆ Where it's heading
The package has finished the implementation programme it set out in its 2023 vignette and is now working on the edges: interoperability with other state-space packages rather than more estimation methods of its own. The convert() function is the clearest signal — instead of implementing smoothing and prediction intervals natively, it hands the model to packages that already have them. The rOpenSci move also puts it on a review-backed, documented footing that research users can cite.
◆ Prediction
Expect continued interoperability and diagnostic work rather than new estimators, since the maintainer has explicitly scoped the package as complete. Bug fixes against RcppArmadillo releases will likely remain the other recurring driver.
Alternatives to charlatan and dfms
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either charlatan or dfms.
maplegend
The legend engine mapsf spun out, now covering legend types the parent map package can draw.
lang
R help pages translated on demand by whichever LLM you point it at.
mapsf
Thematic mapping in base R that finally got a theming system, then spent two years polishing legends.
qualtRics
qualtRics moved its contact functions onto XM Directory days before the old endpoints died.
fabletools
The tidyverts forecasting core rebuilt model combination on full residual covariance.
See all charlatan alternatives → · See all dfms alternatives →
Recent activity from charlatan and dfms
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1mo agodfmsconvert() exports models to dlm and KFAS state-space objects
- 6mo agodfms1.0: rOpenSci review passed, news decomposition added ⚡
- 6mo agodfmsMixed-frequency estimation gains AR(1) idiosyncratic errors
- 7mo agocharlatanDocs rebuild surfaces a duplicate Norwegian phone pattern
- 9mo agodfmsC++ compatibility with RcppArmadillo 15.0.2
- 1y agodfmsFixes estimation with a single quarterly variable
- 1y agodfmsAdds mixed-frequency estimation via quarterly.vars
- 1y agocharlatanProvider classes restructured so locales can override single functions ⚡
- 6y agocharlatanNew locales and providers; allowed_locales() added
- 7y agocharlatanLocale naming standardised; French and Danish data corrected
- 8y agocharlatancharlatan v0.2.2
- 8y agocharlatanSix new providers broaden charlatan beyond names and addresses
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between charlatan and dfms?
Both compete on the same themes — ropensci — within Analytics. charlatan and dfms are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is charlatan better than dfms?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. charlatan and dfms are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to charlatan?
Top charlatan alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "charlatan alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/charlatan for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to dfms?
Top dfms alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "dfms alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/dfms for the full list with editorial commentary on each.