← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

cffr vs ymlthis

A side-by-side editorial comparison of cffr and ymlthis — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

cffr vs ymlthis: at a glance

Featurecffrymlthis
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themescitation-metadata, r-packages, schema-validation, open-sciencer-markdown, yaml, retirement, quarto
Last editorial update5h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is cffr?

cffr keeps CITATION.cff generation in step with the standard and its R sources.

The package generates and validates CITATION.cff files from R package metadata. Recent work is validation and parsing accuracy rather than new outputs: cff_validate() moved onto the ajv engine through jsonvalidate for clearer errors, ROR identifiers act as a website fallback for people and entities, and DOIs are now detected in inst/CITATION url fields including dx.doi.org forms.

Read the full cffr trajectory →

What is ymlthis?

ymlthis retired itself, naming Quarto as the reason it no longer needs to exist.

ymlthis built R Markdown YAML front matter programmatically — a fluent `yml_*()` interface plus RStudio add-ins, so users did not have to hand-write metadata blocks whose valid fields were scattered across output-format documentation. Version 1.0.0 declares the package retired, with only CRAN-preserving changes to follow, and states the reason plainly: Quarto now provides good YAML support.

Read the full ymlthis trajectory →

cffr vs ymlthis: editorial side-by-side

C
cffr
ANALYTICS
0.0

cffr keeps CITATION.cff generation in step with the standard and its R sources.

◆ Current state

The package generates and validates CITATION.cff files from R package metadata. Recent work is validation and parsing accuracy rather than new outputs: cff_validate() moved onto the ajv engine through jsonvalidate for clearer errors, ROR identifiers act as a website fallback for people and entities, and DOIs are now detected in inst/CITATION url fields including dx.doi.org forms.

◆ Where it's heading

The package tracks two moving targets — the Citation File Format schema and R's own person and citation handling, which has broken extraction twice in recent releases. Between those, releases pick up ecosystem details: Codeberg recognised as a repository host, CRAN-to-SPDX licence mappings refreshed, GitHub Action defaults changed to save quota. The most recent release is an internal refactor carried out with AI assistance, with no user-facing change.

◆ Prediction

With validation migrated and the R 4.5 person changes absorbed, the next release most likely follows a Citation File Format schema update rather than adding capability.

Y
ymlthis
ANALYTICS
0.0

ymlthis retired itself, naming Quarto as the reason it no longer needs to exist.

◆ Current state

ymlthis built R Markdown YAML front matter programmatically — a fluent `yml_*()` interface plus RStudio add-ins, so users did not have to hand-write metadata blocks whose valid fields were scattered across output-format documentation. Version 1.0.0 declares the package retired, with only CRAN-preserving changes to follow, and states the reason plainly: Quarto now provides good YAML support.

◆ Where it's heading

The retirement is the endpoint of a long drift. Between 2020 and 2022 every release was reactive — patching around a crayon update that mangled rendered YAML, tracking shiny 1.6, following roxygen2 7.0.0, fixing a typo in an add-in. No new capability has landed in six years, and the four-year gap before 1.0.0 had already answered the question the release note finally makes explicit.

◆ Prediction

Nothing further of substance is expected — the stated policy is changes only where CRAN requires them, so the next release, if any, will be a compatibility patch.

Alternatives to cffr and ymlthis

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either cffr or ymlthis.

See all cffr alternatives → · See all ymlthis alternatives →

Recent activity from cffr and ymlthis

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agocffrInternal refactor and test hardening
  2. 3mo agocffrValidation moves to ajv; ROR and DOI detection improve
  3. 5mo agocffrR 4.1 minimum and Quarto vignettes
  4. 5mo agoymlthisymlthis retired; Quarto covers the need
  5. 7mo agocffrAction defaults and person-comment parsing
  6. 1y agocffrcff_write() can now generate inst/CITATION too
  7. 1y agocffrORCID extraction adapted to R person changes
  8. 4y agoymlthisTypo fixed in the miniUI add-in check
  9. 4y agoymlthisyml_author() accepts yml_blank(); shiny fixes
  10. 4y agoymlthisciteproc handling moved to newer rmarkdown functions
  11. 5y agoymlthisPatched a crayon update that mangled rendered YAML
  12. 5y agoymlthisAdjustments for shiny 1.6

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between cffr and ymlthis?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. cffr and ymlthis are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is cffr better than ymlthis?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. cffr and ymlthis are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to cffr?

Top cffr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "cffr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/cffr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to ymlthis?

Top ymlthis alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ymlthis alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ymlthis for the full list with editorial commentary on each.