← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

cffr vs maplegend

A side-by-side editorial comparison of cffr and maplegend — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

cffr vs maplegend: at a glance

Featurecffrmaplegend
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themescitation-metadata, r-packages, schema-validation, open-sciencecartography, legends, base-graphics, spatial
Last editorial update3h ago54m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is cffr?

cffr keeps CITATION.cff generation in step with the standard and its R sources.

The package generates and validates CITATION.cff files from R package metadata. Recent work is validation and parsing accuracy rather than new outputs: cff_validate() moved onto the ajv engine through jsonvalidate for clearer errors, ROR identifiers act as a website fallback for people and entities, and DOIs are now detected in inst/CITATION url fields including dx.doi.org forms.

Read the full cffr trajectory →

What is maplegend?

The legend engine mapsf spun out, now covering legend types the parent map package can draw.

maplegend draws the legends for base-R thematic maps, extracted from mapsf so both packages could evolve the legend vocabulary independently. It has been catching up to the map types it has to serve: 0.6.0 added choro_point, choro_line, and choro_symb for choropleth legends rendered on circles, lines, and symbols, following the histogram legend type in 0.4.0. Considerable effort has gone into behaving correctly when the plot aspect ratio is not 1, which required refactoring most of the package in 0.4.0 and still produced a proportional-symbol segment sizing fix in 0.6.3.

Read the full maplegend trajectory →

cffr vs maplegend: editorial side-by-side

C
cffr
ANALYTICS
0.0

cffr keeps CITATION.cff generation in step with the standard and its R sources.

◆ Current state

The package generates and validates CITATION.cff files from R package metadata. Recent work is validation and parsing accuracy rather than new outputs: cff_validate() moved onto the ajv engine through jsonvalidate for clearer errors, ROR identifiers act as a website fallback for people and entities, and DOIs are now detected in inst/CITATION url fields including dx.doi.org forms.

◆ Where it's heading

The package tracks two moving targets — the Citation File Format schema and R's own person and citation handling, which has broken extraction twice in recent releases. Between those, releases pick up ecosystem details: Codeberg recognised as a repository host, CRAN-to-SPDX licence mappings refreshed, GitHub Action defaults changed to save quota. The most recent release is an internal refactor carried out with AI assistance, with no user-facing change.

◆ Prediction

With validation migrated and the R 4.5 person changes absorbed, the next release most likely follows a Citation File Format schema update rather than adding capability.

M
maplegend
ANALYTICS
0.0

The legend engine mapsf spun out, now covering legend types the parent map package can draw.

◆ Current state

maplegend draws the legends for base-R thematic maps, extracted from mapsf so both packages could evolve the legend vocabulary independently. It has been catching up to the map types it has to serve: 0.6.0 added choro_point, choro_line, and choro_symb for choropleth legends rendered on circles, lines, and symbols, following the histogram legend type in 0.4.0. Considerable effort has gone into behaving correctly when the plot aspect ratio is not 1, which required refactoring most of the package in 0.4.0 and still produced a proportional-symbol segment sizing fix in 0.6.3.

◆ Where it's heading

This is a support library whose backlog is defined by its caller. Every legend type mapsf can produce needs a matching legend renderer, and the release notes are dominated by spacing, offset, and border details — box_cex for symbol spacing, NA box placement in horizontal choropleth legends, text overflow when no_data is set. The shared vocabulary with mapsf is being maintained deliberately, with val_rnd, val_big, and val_dec propagating through legend types release by release. Version numbering is not monotonic in this feed, with 0.4.0 published seconds after 0.5.0.

◆ Prediction

Expect the remaining combined map types to acquire matching legends and the val_* formatting arguments to reach the types that still lack them.

Alternatives to cffr and maplegend

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either cffr or maplegend.

See all cffr alternatives → · See all maplegend alternatives →

Recent activity from cffr and maplegend

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agocffrInternal refactor and test hardening
  2. 2mo agomaplegendContinuous legend formatting and aspect-ratio segment fix
  3. 3mo agocffrValidation moves to ajv; ROR and DOI detection improve
  4. 4mo agomaplegendChoropleth legends on points, lines and symbols
  5. 5mo agocffrR 4.1 minimum and Quarto vignettes
  6. 7mo agomaplegendPackage-wide refactor for non-unity aspect ratios, histogram legends
  7. 7mo agomaplegendSingle-modality legends allowed for typo, symb and prop_line
  8. 7mo agocffrAction defaults and person-comment parsing
  9. 1y agomaplegendAlpha transparency and redraw on device resize
  10. 1y agomaplegendOffset and symbol sizing aligned with mapsf
  11. 1y agocffrcff_write() can now generate inst/CITATION too
  12. 1y agocffrORCID extraction adapted to R person changes

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between cffr and maplegend?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. cffr and maplegend are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is cffr better than maplegend?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. cffr and maplegend are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to cffr?

Top cffr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "cffr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/cffr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to maplegend?

Top maplegend alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "maplegend alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/maplegend for the full list with editorial commentary on each.