← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

cfbfastr vs ggquiver

A side-by-side editorial comparison of cfbfastr and ggquiver — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

cfbfastr vs ggquiver: at a glance

Featurecfbfastrggquiver
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themescollege-football, sports-analytics, api-migration, rate-limitsggplot2 extension, vector fields, data visualization, coordinate systems
Last editorial update1h ago2h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is cfbfastr?

College football's open data client hit v2 — and now reports how many API calls you have left.

cfbfastR retrieves college football data — play-by-play, box scores, betting lines, ratings and recruiting — from the CollegeFootballData API, ESPN endpoints and the sportsdataverse data repository. Version 2.0.0 in September 2025 was the first release in over three years and rebuilt the package against CFBD's v2 API. Every load_cfb_*() function changed its underlying source to comply with CFBD's terms, the play-by-play dataset gained team and game identifiers users previously had to join in themselves, and a batch of new endpoints arrived covering opponent-adjusted metrics, FPI ratings and live scoreboard and play data.

Read the full cfbfastr trajectory →

What is ggquiver?

ggquiver returned after four years to make arrows respect ggplot's own scales.

A small ggplot2 extension for quiver and vector-field plots. The 0.3.x line in late 2021 was about making arrows behave correctly outside plain Cartesian coordinates — non-Cartesian coordinate systems, ggmap backgrounds, arrow sizing and angles. Then nothing for over four years, until 0.4.0 made arrows honour scale transformations on the x and y aesthetics and exposed grid::arrow()'s appearance options.

Read the full ggquiver trajectory →

cfbfastr vs ggquiver: editorial side-by-side

C
cfbfastr
ANALYTICS
0.0

College football's open data client hit v2 — and now reports how many API calls you have left.

◆ Current state

cfbfastR retrieves college football data — play-by-play, box scores, betting lines, ratings and recruiting — from the CollegeFootballData API, ESPN endpoints and the sportsdataverse data repository. Version 2.0.0 in September 2025 was the first release in over three years and rebuilt the package against CFBD's v2 API. Every load_cfb_*() function changed its underlying source to comply with CFBD's terms, the play-by-play dataset gained team and game identifiers users previously had to join in themselves, and a batch of new endpoints arrived covering opponent-adjusted metrics, FPI ratings and live scoreboard and play data.

◆ Where it's heading

The package's direction is now set by the data provider rather than by its own plans, and that provider has moved to metered access — the free tier is capped at 1,000 calls a month, with limits tied to membership level. cfbd_api_key_info() reporting a user's tier and usage is the clearest sign of that shift: quota is now something an analysis has to manage. The long gap before 2.0.0 and its arrival largely through a first-time contributor also indicate a package sustained by community effort rather than steady maintenance.

◆ Prediction

The live scoreboard and play endpoints are the natural place for the next work, since they are the ones that benefit from in-season iteration. Given the release notes warn users to check their pipelines, follow-up fixes for the changed loading functions are likely before anything new lands.

G
ggquiver
ANALYTICS
0.0

ggquiver returned after four years to make arrows respect ggplot's own scales.

◆ Current state

A small ggplot2 extension for quiver and vector-field plots. The 0.3.x line in late 2021 was about making arrows behave correctly outside plain Cartesian coordinates — non-Cartesian coordinate systems, ggmap backgrounds, arrow sizing and angles. Then nothing for over four years, until 0.4.0 made arrows honour scale transformations on the x and y aesthetics and exposed grid::arrow()'s appearance options.

◆ Where it's heading

The consistent theme across both eras is deferring to ggplot2 rather than drawing on top of it: coordinate systems first, then scale transformations, then arrow styling handed to grid. Development is episodic — years pass, then a release that closes the gap between what the geom does and what a user expects from any other layer. The changelog is entirely correctness and integration work; there is no sign of the package growing new plot types.

◆ Prediction

The entries only support a narrow read: further releases will likely keep closing ggplot2 integration gaps as they are reported, but the four-year gap means cadence is not predictable from this feed.

Alternatives to cfbfastr and ggquiver

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either cfbfastr or ggquiver.

See all cfbfastr alternatives → · See all ggquiver alternatives →

Recent activity from cfbfastr and ggquiver

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 6mo agoggquiverArrows respect scale transformations and grid arrow styling
  2. 11mo agocfbfastrRebuilt on CFBD API v2 with metered access and live endpoints
  3. 4y agocfbfastrESPN endpoints and repo-backed loaders added
  4. 4y agocfbfastrAll outputs standardised as tibbles with a custom class
  5. 4y agoggquiverArrow scaling and centered-arrow angle fixes
  6. 4y agoggquiverFix for resized vectors via vecsize
  7. 4y agocfbfastrCRAN release with option-restoring cleanup
  8. 4y agocfbfastrMinor fixes to betting and FPI rating functions
  9. 4y agoggquiverNon-Cartesian coordinates and ggmap backgrounds supported
  10. 4y agocfbfastrESPN scoreboard and play-by-play access, with argument cleanup

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between cfbfastr and ggquiver?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. cfbfastr and ggquiver are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is cfbfastr better than ggquiver?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. cfbfastr and ggquiver are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to cfbfastr?

Top cfbfastr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "cfbfastr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/cfbfastr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to ggquiver?

Top ggquiver alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ggquiver alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ggquiver for the full list with editorial commentary on each.