← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

censored vs textrecipes

A side-by-side editorial comparison of censored and textrecipes — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:tidymodels

censored vs textrecipes: at a glance

Featurecensoredtextrecipes
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themessurvival-analysis, tidymodels, parsnip, enginestext-processing, tidymodels, recipes, sparse-data
Last editorial update5h ago51m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is censored?

censored keeps survival models aligned with parsnip's shifting prediction contracts

censored supplies survival-analysis engines to parsnip, and its release history is dominated by staying in step with the rest of tidymodels rather than shipping independent features. The 0.2.0 and 0.3.0 releases added engines and prediction types; everything since has been contract alignment — quantile prediction format, hardhat test adaptation, flexsurv preparation.

Read the full censored trajectory →

What is textrecipes?

Text features finally stay sparse all the way to the model.

textrecipes supplies the recipes steps for turning text into model-ready columns: tokenizing, hashing, term frequency, TF-IDF, and word embeddings. Version 1.1.0 added a sparse argument to step_dummy_hash(), step_texthash(), step_tf() and step_tfidf() so they emit sparse vectors. The releases before it are a long consistency pass — keep_original_cols on every step that creates columns, informative errors on name collisions, tunable arguments documented, integer rather than double output where integers are what is meant.

Read the full textrecipes trajectory →

censored vs textrecipes: editorial side-by-side

C
censored
ANALYTICS
0.0

censored keeps survival models aligned with parsnip's shifting prediction contracts

◆ Current state

censored supplies survival-analysis engines to parsnip, and its release history is dominated by staying in step with the rest of tidymodels rather than shipping independent features. The 0.2.0 and 0.3.0 releases added engines and prediction types; everything since has been contract alignment — quantile prediction format, hardhat test adaptation, flexsurv preparation.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is settling into a downstream role where parsnip and hardhat set the interface and censored implements it for censored regression. Breaking changes arrive from upstream, not from new ideas here. The substantive engine work — aorsf, flexsurvspline, glmnet multi_predict — is behind it, and recent cycles are thin.

◆ Prediction

Expect the next releases to track further parsnip prediction-type changes rather than add engines; the entries do not show new survival methods in progress.

T
textrecipes
ANALYTICS
0.0

Text features finally stay sparse all the way to the model.

◆ Current state

textrecipes supplies the recipes steps for turning text into model-ready columns: tokenizing, hashing, term frequency, TF-IDF, and word embeddings. Version 1.1.0 added a sparse argument to step_dummy_hash(), step_texthash(), step_tf() and step_tfidf() so they emit sparse vectors. The releases before it are a long consistency pass — keep_original_cols on every step that creates columns, informative errors on name collisions, tunable arguments documented, integer rather than double output where integers are what is meant.

◆ Where it's heading

Two forces drive this package. One is memory: text produces wide, mostly-zero matrices, and the sparse work is the direct answer, landing in the same period that workflows learned to fit and predict on dgCMatrix input. The other is upstream churn — the tweets tokenizer was deprecated because tokenizers deprecated it, the politeness feature disappeared when textfeatures left Suggests. The package's own agenda is consistency; its release timing belongs to its dependencies.

◆ Prediction

Expect the sparse argument to spread to the remaining column-producing steps, since only four of them have it, and expect more steps to be reworked as recipes' own sparse-data support matures.

Alternatives to censored and textrecipes

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either censored or textrecipes.

See all censored alternatives → · See all textrecipes alternatives →

Recent activity from censored and textrecipes

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 4mo agocensoredcensored 0.3.4
  2. 1y agotextrecipesHashing and TF-IDF steps can emit sparse vectors
  3. 1y agocensoredQuantile prediction format follows new parsnip requirements
  4. 1y agotextrecipesstep_textfeatures() sped up; clean_levels NA bug fixed
  5. 2y agocensoredSurvival probabilities at infinite evaluation times now computed
  6. 2y agocensoredcensored 0.3.1
  7. 2y agocensoredmulti_predict() for all glmnet prediction types; aorsf predicts time
  8. 2y agotextrecipestextfeatures dependency dropped; politeness feature removed
  9. 2y agotextrecipesuntokenize and normalization return factors
  10. 2y agotextrecipeskeep_original_cols everywhere; hashing column order fixed
  11. 3y agotextrecipesTunable arguments documented; name collisions now error
  12. 3y agocensoredeval_time replaces time; matrix fitting for censored regression

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between censored and textrecipes?

Both compete on the same themes — tidymodels — within Analytics. censored and textrecipes are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is censored better than textrecipes?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. censored and textrecipes are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to censored?

Top censored alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "censored alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/censored for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to textrecipes?

Top textrecipes alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "textrecipes alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/textrecipes for the full list with editorial commentary on each.