pins
pins keeps adding a storage backend per release while retiring its original API
Comparison · Analytics
censored vs Displayr
A side-by-side editorial comparison of censored and Displayr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
censored vs Displayr: at a glance
What is censored?
censored keeps survival models aligned with parsnip's shifting prediction contracts
censored supplies survival-analysis engines to parsnip, and its release history is dominated by staying in step with the rest of tidymodels rather than shipping independent features. The 0.2.0 and 0.3.0 releases added engines and prediction types; everything since has been contract alignment — quantile prediction format, hardhat test adaptation, flexsurv preparation.
What is Displayr?
Chat is being made legible while the survey-analysis core picks up the fundamentals it lacked.
Displayr is shipping on two fronts at a steady, unhurried cadence. The AI assistant is being made auditable rather than more capable — a context pill showing exactly what a prompt will send, a change summary listing every item Chat added, edited or deleted, and an Explain This button that routes errors and warnings into Chat with context attached. Separately the document core is filling in fundamentals: controls that stay synced across pages and page masters, rolling averages computed on date-keyed tables, browser-style back and forward navigation, and templates that can be saved as folder-scoped defaults.
censored vs Displayr: editorial side-by-side
censored
0.0ANALYTICS
censored keeps survival models aligned with parsnip's shifting prediction contracts
◆ Current state
censored supplies survival-analysis engines to parsnip, and its release history is dominated by staying in step with the rest of tidymodels rather than shipping independent features. The 0.2.0 and 0.3.0 releases added engines and prediction types; everything since has been contract alignment — quantile prediction format, hardhat test adaptation, flexsurv preparation.
◆ Where it's heading
The package is settling into a downstream role where parsnip and hardhat set the interface and censored implements it for censored regression. Breaking changes arrive from upstream, not from new ideas here. The substantive engine work — aorsf, flexsurvspline, glmnet multi_predict — is behind it, and recent cycles are thin.
◆ Prediction
Expect the next releases to track further parsnip prediction-type changes rather than add engines; the entries do not show new survival methods in progress.
Displayr
5.0ANALYTICS
Chat is being made legible while the survey-analysis core picks up the fundamentals it lacked.
◆ Current state
Displayr is shipping on two fronts at a steady, unhurried cadence. The AI assistant is being made auditable rather than more capable — a context pill showing exactly what a prompt will send, a change summary listing every item Chat added, edited or deleted, and an Explain This button that routes errors and warnings into Chat with context attached. Separately the document core is filling in fundamentals: controls that stay synced across pages and page masters, rolling averages computed on date-keyed tables, browser-style back and forward navigation, and templates that can be saved as folder-scoped defaults.
◆ Where it's heading
The Chat work reads as a deliberate answer to the trust problem with AI in analyst tools — every release makes what the assistant touched inspectable rather than expanding what it can do unprompted. The other track is closing gaps a long-standing survey analysis platform accumulates, with the default-template mechanic notable for scoping defaults by Cloud Drive folder, which turns a personal preference into an organizational standard. Neither track has produced a directional move in this window.
◆ Prediction
Expect the transparency pattern to extend to Chat actions that modify data rather than layout, since the change summary establishes the mechanism. Folder-scoped defaults look like the start of broader template governance.
Alternatives to censored and Displayr
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either censored or Displayr.
tsibble
tsibble shipped one release in five and a half years - the data structure is finished
yardstick
yardstick made fairness metrics a first-class part of tidymodels evaluation
tune
tune extends tuning past the model itself to postprocessors, and adds a second parallel backend
leaflet
leaflet relicensed to MIT and finished migrating off R's retired spatial stack
ggpubr
ggpubr reached 1.0.0 with p-value formatting presets for specific journals
See all censored alternatives → · See all Displayr alternatives →
Recent activity from censored and Displayr
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 19h agoDisplayrUse the Same Control Across Multiple Pages and Page Masters
- 19h agoDisplayrRolling Averages Computed Automatically on Tables
- 16d agoDisplayrExplain This — AI help for errors & warnings
- 16d agoDisplayrBack and Forward Buttons for Navigation
- 16d agoDisplayrSave Templates as Default Visualizations
- 1mo agoDisplayrMore transparency when working with Chat
- 4mo agocensoredcensored 0.3.4
- 1y agocensoredQuantile prediction format follows new parsnip requirements
- 2y agocensoredSurvival probabilities at infinite evaluation times now computed
- 2y agocensoredcensored 0.3.1
- 2y agocensoredmulti_predict() for all glmnet prediction types; aorsf predicts time
- 3y agocensoredeval_time replaces time; matrix fitting for censored regression
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between censored and Displayr?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Displayr is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is censored better than Displayr?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Displayr is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to censored?
Top censored alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "censored alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/censored for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to Displayr?
Top Displayr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Displayr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/displayr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.