← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

carrier vs goodpractice

A side-by-side editorial comparison of carrier and goodpractice — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

carrier vs goodpractice: at a glance

Featurecarriergoodpractice
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesr-package, serialization, remote-execution, r-libcode-quality, static-analysis, r-package, ropensci
Last editorial update2h ago52m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is carrier?

carrier's 0.3.0 quietly rewrites how crated functions see each other — and breaks code that relied on the old rules.

carrier packages an R function together with the data it needs so it can be shipped to another process or machine. 0.3.0 changed the semantics of functions passed through ...: they are now re-crated inside the main crate environment instead of inheriting from wherever they were defined. That fixes helper functions failing to resolve each other remotely, and stops local environments dragging large objects into the payload.

Read the full carrier trajectory →

What is goodpractice?

The R package-quality checker returns from CRAN limbo with checks you can select by category.

goodpractice runs a battery of static checks over an R package — style, complexity, test coverage, documentation, DESCRIPTION hygiene — and reports what a reviewer would flag. The package was archived on CRAN, adopted by rOpenSci in 1.0.5, and version 1.1 is the first substantive release since: every check now belongs to one of 16 named groups, discoverable via all_check_groups() and selectable via checks_by_group(), with group-level exclusion through an option or environment variable and new default_checks() and tidyverse_checks() presets.

Read the full goodpractice trajectory →

carrier vs goodpractice: editorial side-by-side

C
carrier
INFRA · APIS
0.0

carrier's 0.3.0 quietly rewrites how crated functions see each other — and breaks code that relied on the old rules.

◆ Current state

carrier packages an R function together with the data it needs so it can be shipped to another process or machine. 0.3.0 changed the semantics of functions passed through ...: they are now re-crated inside the main crate environment instead of inheriting from wherever they were defined. That fixes helper functions failing to resolve each other remotely, and stops local environments dragging large objects into the payload.

◆ Where it's heading

Each release tightens the boundary between a crate and its surroundings. 0.2.0 introduced .parent_env defaulting to baseenv() to cut the crate off from the global search path and made unnamed ... arguments an error instead of a silent drop; 0.3.0 finishes the job by controlling the environment chain of the packed closures themselves. The package is trading backwards compatibility for predictable, self-contained payloads — a reasonable bet for something whose failures otherwise surface on a remote worker.

◆ Prediction

The 0.1.0 notes promised an automatic dependency-detection mode to replace explicit packing; nothing since has delivered it, and with the environment semantics now settled that is the obvious next move — though the entries give no date for it.

G
goodpractice
INFRA · APIS
0.0

The R package-quality checker returns from CRAN limbo with checks you can select by category.

◆ Current state

goodpractice runs a battery of static checks over an R package — style, complexity, test coverage, documentation, DESCRIPTION hygiene — and reports what a reviewer would flag. The package was archived on CRAN, adopted by rOpenSci in 1.0.5, and version 1.1 is the first substantive release since: every check now belongs to one of 16 named groups, discoverable via all_check_groups() and selectable via checks_by_group(), with group-level exclusion through an option or environment variable and new default_checks() and tidyverse_checks() presets.

◆ Where it's heading

The direction is from a monolithic verdict toward a configurable one. Previously the practical choices were run everything or name individual checks; grouping makes partial adoption tractable, which matters because the full battery is opinionated enough that teams either accept all of it or ignore the tool. The tidyverse_checks() preset makes that explicit — the package is acknowledging that its defaults encode one house style among several. Earlier releases pointed the same way with a configurable cyclomatic complexity limit and adjustable output length.

◆ Prediction

With grouping and presets in place, the natural next step is per-project persistent configuration so exclusions live in the repository rather than in an option or environment variable.

Alternatives to carrier and goodpractice

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either carrier or goodpractice.

See all carrier alternatives → · See all goodpractice alternatives →

Recent activity from carrier and goodpractice

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 2mo agogoodpracticeChecks organized into 16 selectable groups with presets
  2. 11mo agocarrierCrated helper functions can now see each other
  3. 1y agocarriercrate() gains .parent_env and stricter argument handling
  4. 2y agogoodpracticerOpenSci takes over maintenance, package restored to CRAN
  5. 3y agocarrierSource references dropped from crated functions
  6. 4y agogoodpracticeConfigurable cyclomatic complexity limit and output length
  7. 4y agocarrierInitial release with explicit-only crate packing
  8. 5y agogoodpracticePackage logo added

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between carrier and goodpractice?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Infra & APIs. carrier and goodpractice are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is carrier better than goodpractice?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. carrier and goodpractice are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to carrier?

Top carrier alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "carrier alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/carrier for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to goodpractice?

Top goodpractice alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "goodpractice alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/goodpractice for the full list with editorial commentary on each.