fillpattern
Pattern fills for ggplot2, hardened against the ways users write sizes
Comparison · Analytics
brglm2 vs tglkmeans
A side-by-side editorial comparison of brglm2 and tglkmeans — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:r-package
brglm2 vs tglkmeans: at a glance
What is brglm2?
A bias-reduction package reaches 1.0 by adding an estimator built for high-dimensional logistic regression
brglm2 fits generalized linear models using mean and median bias reduction rather than plain maximum likelihood, which matters most when ML estimates are infinite or badly biased. The 0.7-0.9 line broadened coverage — negative binomial via brnb(), ordinal superiority measures, the expo() method for exponentiated parameters, add1()/drop1() so step() stops silently producing nonsense. Version 1.0.0 in August 2025 added mdyplFit(), estimating logistic regression by maximum Diaconis-Ylvisaker prior penalized likelihood with optional high-dimensional corrections. The two releases since have tuned that new path.
What is tglkmeans?
A k-means implementation that just told users their Spearman clustering on missing data was wrong
tglkmeans is a multi-core k-means implementation with seeding, aimed at single-cell and other large matrix workloads. Version 0.4.0 flipped the id_column default and moved to R's random number generator, 0.5.x added count-matrix downsampling and fixed id handling, and 0.6.3 in May 2026 is a correctness release: Spearman distance was ranking missing values as the largest value instead of dropping them, and predict_tgl_kmeans() with Euclidean distance did not reproduce the training metric when a cluster center had a missing dimension.
brglm2 vs tglkmeans: editorial side-by-side
brglm2
0.0ANALYTICS
A bias-reduction package reaches 1.0 by adding an estimator built for high-dimensional logistic regression
◆ Current state
brglm2 fits generalized linear models using mean and median bias reduction rather than plain maximum likelihood, which matters most when ML estimates are infinite or badly biased. The 0.7-0.9 line broadened coverage — negative binomial via brnb(), ordinal superiority measures, the expo() method for exponentiated parameters, add1()/drop1() so step() stops silently producing nonsense. Version 1.0.0 in August 2025 added mdyplFit(), estimating logistic regression by maximum Diaconis-Ylvisaker prior penalized likelihood with optional high-dimensional corrections. The two releases since have tuned that new path.
◆ Where it's heading
The package's older work assumed the classical regime where observations comfortably outnumber parameters. mdyplFit() and its hd_correction argument target the opposite case, and the follow-up releases are almost entirely about it — Pearson residuals on original responses, aliased parameter handling, the sloe() signal-strength estimator ignoring leverage-one observations. Meanwhile the older surface gets graceful-failure work: brglm_fit() now returns its latest estimates with warnings rather than aborting.
◆ Prediction
Given that 1.0.1 and 1.1.0 are both dominated by mdyplFit follow-ups while the classical path receives only robustness fixes, further work on high-dimensional corrections is the likeliest direction.
tglkmeans
0.0ANALYTICS
A k-means implementation that just told users their Spearman clustering on missing data was wrong
◆ Current state
tglkmeans is a multi-core k-means implementation with seeding, aimed at single-cell and other large matrix workloads. Version 0.4.0 flipped the id_column default and moved to R's random number generator, 0.5.x added count-matrix downsampling and fixed id handling, and 0.6.3 in May 2026 is a correctness release: Spearman distance was ranking missing values as the largest value instead of dropping them, and predict_tgl_kmeans() with Euclidean distance did not reproduce the training metric when a cluster center had a missing dimension.
◆ Where it's heading
The package handles missing data across three distance metrics, and 0.6.3 shows those paths had drifted apart — Spearman behaved unlike Euclidean and Pearson, and prediction behaved unlike training. Both fixes change results on affected data, and the release notes are careful to bound exactly where: Spearman on data with NAs changes, complete data does not. Performance work runs alongside, with the dense per-thread vote matrix removed from the reassignment step.
◆ Prediction
With the metric paths now aligned on missing-value handling, further work is more likely to target the parallel reassignment internals than the distance semantics.
Alternatives to brglm2 and tglkmeans
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either brglm2 or tglkmeans.
gcube
gcube's recent releases are all packaging metadata, not simulation code
cubist
The R port of Quinlan's Cubist gets reproducibility fixes, not new modelling
ggstats
ggstats keeps widening what a coefficient or Likert plot can be
ecodive
ecodive rebuilt itself into a broad diversity-metric library, breaking as it went
simStateSpace
State-space data simulation for R, filled in one function at a time
See all brglm2 alternatives → · See all tglkmeans alternatives →
Recent activity from brglm2 and tglkmeans
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 2mo agotglkmeansSpearman metric no longer ranks missing values as the largest
- 3mo agobrglm2brglm2 v1.1.0
- 8mo agobrglm2brglm2 v1.0.1
- 11mo agobrglm21.0.0 adds maximum DY-prior penalized likelihood for logistic regression ⚡
- 1y agobrglm2brglm2 v0.9.3
- 1y agobrglm2brglm2 v0.9.2
- 2y agotglkmeansFixes corrupted cluster ids and dropped dimnames
- 2y agotglkmeansAdds downsample_matrix() for count matrices
- 2y agotglkmeansBreaking: id_column defaults to FALSE, switches to R's RNG
- 3y agobrglm2brglm2 v0.9.1
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between brglm2 and tglkmeans?
Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. brglm2 and tglkmeans are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is brglm2 better than tglkmeans?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. brglm2 and tglkmeans are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to brglm2?
Top brglm2 alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "brglm2 alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/brglm2 for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to tglkmeans?
Top tglkmeans alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "tglkmeans alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tglkmeans for the full list with editorial commentary on each.