fillpattern
Pattern fills for ggplot2, hardened against the ways users write sizes
Comparison · Analytics
brglm2 vs spEDM
A side-by-side editorial comparison of brglm2 and spEDM — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:r-package
brglm2 vs spEDM: at a glance
What is brglm2?
A bias-reduction package reaches 1.0 by adding an estimator built for high-dimensional logistic regression
brglm2 fits generalized linear models using mean and median bias reduction rather than plain maximum likelihood, which matters most when ML estimates are infinite or badly biased. The 0.7-0.9 line broadened coverage — negative binomial via brnb(), ordinal superiority measures, the expo() method for exponentiated parameters, add1()/drop1() so step() stops silently producing nonsense. Version 1.0.0 in August 2025 added mdyplFit(), estimating logistic regression by maximum Diaconis-Ylvisaker prior penalized likelihood with optional high-dimensional corrections. The two releases since have tuned that new path.
What is spEDM?
Spatial causal discovery in R, one exposed method per release
spEDM brings empirical dynamic modeling to spatial data — cross mapping, convergent cross mapping and pattern causality over spatial vector and raster inputs, with the numerics in C++ behind S4 generics. The recent releases have exposed geographical pattern causality and spatially convergent partial cross mapping at the R level with vignettes, and 1.12 turns to consolidating the API. It is part of the stscl family alongside the temporal-domain tEDM, with which it shares both its C++ core and its maintainer.
brglm2 vs spEDM: editorial side-by-side
brglm2
0.0ANALYTICS
A bias-reduction package reaches 1.0 by adding an estimator built for high-dimensional logistic regression
◆ Current state
brglm2 fits generalized linear models using mean and median bias reduction rather than plain maximum likelihood, which matters most when ML estimates are infinite or badly biased. The 0.7-0.9 line broadened coverage — negative binomial via brnb(), ordinal superiority measures, the expo() method for exponentiated parameters, add1()/drop1() so step() stops silently producing nonsense. Version 1.0.0 in August 2025 added mdyplFit(), estimating logistic regression by maximum Diaconis-Ylvisaker prior penalized likelihood with optional high-dimensional corrections. The two releases since have tuned that new path.
◆ Where it's heading
The package's older work assumed the classical regime where observations comfortably outnumber parameters. mdyplFit() and its hd_correction argument target the opposite case, and the follow-up releases are almost entirely about it — Pearson residuals on original responses, aliased parameter handling, the sloe() signal-strength estimator ignoring leverage-one observations. Meanwhile the older surface gets graceful-failure work: brglm_fit() now returns its latest estimates with warnings rather than aborting.
◆ Prediction
Given that 1.0.1 and 1.1.0 are both dominated by mdyplFit follow-ups while the classical path receives only robustness fixes, further work on high-dimensional corrections is the likeliest direction.
spEDM
0.0ANALYTICS
Spatial causal discovery in R, one exposed method per release
◆ Current state
spEDM brings empirical dynamic modeling to spatial data — cross mapping, convergent cross mapping and pattern causality over spatial vector and raster inputs, with the numerics in C++ behind S4 generics. The recent releases have exposed geographical pattern causality and spatially convergent partial cross mapping at the R level with vignettes, and 1.12 turns to consolidating the API. It is part of the stscl family alongside the temporal-domain tEDM, with which it shares both its C++ core and its maintainer.
◆ Where it's heading
The cadence is steady and predictable: each release surfaces one more EDM method as an R-level API with a vignette, then spends the rest of its notes on parameter-handling consistency across the generics. Breaking changes are frequent and deliberate — argument renames, parameter reordering, NA-handling defaults — which reads as a package still settling its interface while the method surface expands. Shared changes appear in tEDM within days, so interface churn lands on both packages at once.
◆ Prediction
Expect the next release to expose another causality variant at the R level with an accompanying vignette, and to continue renaming or reordering parameters toward consistency across the spatial and temporal packages.
Alternatives to brglm2 and spEDM
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either brglm2 or spEDM.
gcube
gcube's recent releases are all packaging metadata, not simulation code
cubist
The R port of Quinlan's Cubist gets reproducibility fixes, not new modelling
ggstats
ggstats keeps widening what a coefficient or Likert plot can be
ecodive
ecodive rebuilt itself into a broad diversity-metric library, breaking as it went
simStateSpace
State-space data simulation for R, filled in one function at a time
See all brglm2 alternatives → · See all spEDM alternatives →
Recent activity from brglm2 and spEDM
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 3mo agobrglm2brglm2 v1.1.0
- 4mo agospEDMData slicing for large-scale pattern causality, plus API breaks
- 6mo agospEDMspEDM 1.11
- 6mo agospEDMSpatially convergent partial cross mapping reaches the R API
- 8mo agospEDMRaster cross mapping with anisotropic embedding
- 8mo agobrglm2brglm2 v1.0.1
- 11mo agospEDMConfigurable distance metrics and multithreaded distance computation
- 11mo agobrglm21.0.0 adds maximum DY-prior penalized likelihood for logistic regression ⚡
- 1y agobrglm2brglm2 v0.9.3
- 1y agobrglm2brglm2 v0.9.2
- 1y agospEDMSpatial logistic map exposed at the R level
- 3y agobrglm2brglm2 v0.9.1
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between brglm2 and spEDM?
Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. brglm2 and spEDM are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is brglm2 better than spEDM?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. brglm2 and spEDM are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to brglm2?
Top brglm2 alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "brglm2 alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/brglm2 for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to spEDM?
Top spEDM alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "spEDM alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/spedm for the full list with editorial commentary on each.