arulesViz
arulesViz finished its move to ggplot2 and has been coasting on maintenance since.
Comparison · Analytics
biocro vs geos
A side-by-side editorial comparison of biocro and geos — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
biocro vs geos: at a glance
What is biocro?
BioCro swapped an unstable iteration for real root finders, changing what its crop models compute.
BioCro is a C++ crop growth simulator with an R interface, built from swappable modules for photosynthesis, respiration and development. Version 3.3.0 added multidimensional and one-dimensional root finders to the C++ source and put them to work immediately, replacing the fixed-point iteration used for intercellular CO2 with a Dekker root finder on the grounds that fixed-point iteration is known to be unstable there. Getting to that release also required moving from C++11 to C++17 and updating the bundled boost from 1.71 to 1.89.
What is geos?
The thin GEOS binding for R adds terra interop after three years of compiler triage
geos is a low-overhead R binding to the GEOS geometry engine, exposing predicates, overlays and spatial indexes with minimal copying. Version 0.2.5 accepts terra SpatVector objects directly, alongside fixes for zero-length memcpy and plotting of invalid geometries. The releases between 0.2.0 and 0.2.5 contain almost no feature work — they are responses to compiler warnings, sanitiser findings and CRAN check failures.
biocro vs geos: editorial side-by-side
biocro
0.0ANALYTICS
BioCro swapped an unstable iteration for real root finders, changing what its crop models compute.
◆ Current state
BioCro is a C++ crop growth simulator with an R interface, built from swappable modules for photosynthesis, respiration and development. Version 3.3.0 added multidimensional and one-dimensional root finders to the C++ source and put them to work immediately, replacing the fixed-point iteration used for intercellular CO2 with a Dekker root finder on the grounds that fixed-point iteration is known to be unstable there. Getting to that release also required moving from C++11 to C++17 and updating the bundled boost from 1.71 to 1.89.
◆ Where it's heading
Two threads run together: the biology is being broken into finer interchangeable modules — separate maintenance respiration, alternative linear and logistic SLA methods, a direct development-index module — while the numerics underneath are being made solvable in general. The root finders are explicitly staged to move into the shared biocro/framework repository, so this is groundwork for other models rather than for this package alone.
◆ Prediction
More module-level alternatives that depend on simultaneous-equation solutions are the natural follow-on, and the root finders should migrate out to biocro/framework as the notes state.
geos
0.0ANALYTICS
The thin GEOS binding for R adds terra interop after three years of compiler triage
◆ Current state
geos is a low-overhead R binding to the GEOS geometry engine, exposing predicates, overlays and spatial indexes with minimal copying. Version 0.2.5 accepts terra SpatVector objects directly, alongside fixes for zero-length memcpy and plotting of invalid geometries. The releases between 0.2.0 and 0.2.5 contain almost no feature work — they are responses to compiler warnings, sanitiser findings and CRAN check failures.
◆ Where it's heading
Feature development stopped after 0.2.0 and the package has since been kept alive against a moving toolchain: strict-prototypes warnings, a clang sanitiser error, format string checks, an M1 test failure. The 0.2.5 terra support breaks that pattern and came from an outside contributor, which suggests the package's direction is now set by what neighbouring spatial packages need from it rather than by GEOS feature coverage.
◆ Prediction
GEOS has released new capabilities since the 3.11 features wired up in 0.2.0, and none have been exposed since; whether the next release closes that gap or continues as interop-and-maintenance is the open question the history does not yet answer.
Alternatives to biocro and geos
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either biocro or geos.
EvoPhylo
EvoPhylo added BEAST2 alongside MrBayes, then went quiet for two years.
treespace
treespace ships once every year or two, and only when CRAN or a user forces it.
Rpath
Rpath 1.1.0 learns to read Ecopath's own files, easing migration off the desktop tool.
TAF
TAF keeps turning ICES stock assessments into reproducible, dependency-pinned projects.
parallelDist
parallelDist is in pure preservation mode — one build fix every few years.
Recent activity from biocro and geos
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 6mo agobiocroCompiler warning blocking Linux builds fixed
- 7mo agogeosAccepts terra SpatVector objects; invalid-geometry plotting fixed
- 8mo agobiocroC++ root finders added; Ci calculation moved off fixed-point iteration ⚡
- 1y agobiocroMaintenance respiration module; SLA split into swappable methods
- 2y agobiocroFirst CRAN-accepted release after a 20 MB to 5 MB cut
- 2y agobiocroDESCRIPTION date refreshed for CRAN submission
- 2y agobiocroCI workflow debugging tag, not a release
- 2y agogeosFix format string checks flagged by CRAN
- 2y agogeosNA/NaN handling adjusted for waldo; M1 test fixed
- 3y agogeosSilence -Wstrict-prototypes warnings
- 3y agogeosFix clang address sanitizer error
- 3y agogeosGEOS 3.11 functions exposed; spatial tree and join helpers added
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between biocro and geos?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. biocro and geos are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is biocro better than geos?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. biocro and geos are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to biocro?
Top biocro alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "biocro alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/biocro-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to geos?
Top geos alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "geos alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/geos-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.