qqman
The Manhattan-plot package for GWAS results, finished and dormant since 2017.
Comparison · Analytics
biocro vs constants
A side-by-side editorial comparison of biocro and constants — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
biocro vs constants: at a glance
What is biocro?
BioCro swapped an unstable iteration for real root finders, changing what its crop models compute.
BioCro is a C++ crop growth simulator with an R interface, built from swappable modules for photosynthesis, respiration and development. Version 3.3.0 added multidimensional and one-dimensional root finders to the C++ source and put them to work immediately, replacing the fixed-point iteration used for intercellular CO2 with a Dekker root finder on the grounds that fixed-point iteration is known to be unstable there. Getting to that release also required moving from C++11 to C++17 and updating the bundled boost from 1.71 to 1.89.
What is constants?
The R package for CODATA constants rebuilt its symbol table on NIST's naming so future updates stop being hand work.
constants exposes the CODATA recommended values of the physical constants to R, as a data frame plus symbol lists that carry units, uncertainties, or both. The package reached 1.0.0 on the 2018 CODATA release and has shipped once since, purely to track a units package update. Its surface is small and its release cadence is bound to CODATA, which revises every few years.
biocro vs constants: editorial side-by-side
biocro
0.0ANALYTICS
BioCro swapped an unstable iteration for real root finders, changing what its crop models compute.
◆ Current state
BioCro is a C++ crop growth simulator with an R interface, built from swappable modules for photosynthesis, respiration and development. Version 3.3.0 added multidimensional and one-dimensional root finders to the C++ source and put them to work immediately, replacing the fixed-point iteration used for intercellular CO2 with a Dekker root finder on the grounds that fixed-point iteration is known to be unstable there. Getting to that release also required moving from C++11 to C++17 and updating the bundled boost from 1.71 to 1.89.
◆ Where it's heading
Two threads run together: the biology is being broken into finer interchangeable modules — separate maintenance respiration, alternative linear and logistic SLA methods, a direct development-index module — while the numerics underneath are being made solvable in general. The root finders are explicitly staged to move into the shared biocro/framework repository, so this is groundwork for other models rather than for this package alone.
◆ Prediction
More module-level alternatives that depend on simultaneous-equation solutions are the natural follow-on, and the root finders should migrate out to biocro/framework as the notes state.
constants
0.0ANALYTICS
The R package for CODATA constants rebuilt its symbol table on NIST's naming so future updates stop being hand work.
◆ Current state
constants exposes the CODATA recommended values of the physical constants to R, as a data frame plus symbol lists that carry units, uncertainties, or both. The package reached 1.0.0 on the 2018 CODATA release and has shipped once since, purely to track a units package update. Its surface is small and its release cadence is bound to CODATA, which revises every few years.
◆ Where it's heading
The direction set at 1.0.0 was to stop being a curated convenience wrapper and become a mechanical mirror of NIST. Hand-crafted symbol names were replaced with NIST's own ASCII symbols, categories adopted NIST's, and uncertainty switched from relative to absolute — all framed by the maintainer as necessary to make future CODATA updates routine. On top of that the package gained a correlation matrix and optional integration with the quantities package, moving it from a lookup table toward something that can propagate uncertainty.
◆ Prediction
Having rebuilt the symbol table specifically so CODATA revisions become mechanical, the next substantive release most likely tracks a new CODATA dataset rather than adding API. The experimental correlated-value support, disabled by default at 1.0.0, is the one part these entries flag as unfinished.
Alternatives to biocro and constants
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either biocro or constants.
austraits
The R client for AusTraits spends its releases chasing the dataset it reads.
ggdemetra
A ggplot2 layer for seasonal adjustment output, filling in one plot type at a time.
fossilsim
A fossil-record simulator that quietly grew a trait-evolution engine.
tern.rbmi
Reference-based multiple imputation tables, shipping only what CRAN checks demand.
tern.mmrm
An MMRM tabulation package that has published nothing since its 2024 CRAN releases.
See all biocro alternatives → · See all constants alternatives →
Recent activity from biocro and constants
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 6mo agobiocroCompiler warning blocking Linux builds fixed
- 8mo agobiocroC++ root finders added; Ci calculation moved off fixed-point iteration ⚡
- 1y agobiocroMaintenance respiration module; SLA split into swappable methods
- 2y agobiocroFirst CRAN-accepted release after a 20 MB to 5 MB cut
- 2y agobiocroDESCRIPTION date refreshed for CRAN submission
- 2y agobiocroCI workflow debugging tag, not a release
- 5y agoconstantsCompatibility fix for units 0.7-0
- 5y agoconstantsconstants 1.0.0 ⚡
- 8y agoconstantsUnit handling fixes ahead of the 1.0.0 rebuild
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between biocro and constants?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. biocro and constants are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is biocro better than constants?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. biocro and constants are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to biocro?
Top biocro alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "biocro alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/biocro-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to constants?
Top constants alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "constants alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/constants-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.