tidytlg
A tables-listings-graphs package that reached CRAN and then went quiet.
A side-by-side editorial comparison of beautier and webmockr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
A BEAST2 XML generator shipping releases CRAN can't accept because the CRAN team is on holiday.
beautier turns R code into BEAST2 phylogenetics XML input files. The three most recent releases landed over four days in August 2025 and are all explicitly marked pre-CRAN, held back because the CRAN team was on summer holiday. The substance sits in 2.6.13, which added tip-date file handling; the two after it are lint and bug fixes.
The stubbing library added httr2 support, then spent a year cutting itself free of everything else
webmockr intercepts HTTP requests in R tests and returns stubbed responses, and since 1.0.0 it covers all three clients that matter — httr, httr2 and crul. The releases through 2025 have been about shedding dependencies: internal R6 classes unexported in 2.1.0, crul demoted from Imports to Suggests in the same release, and the mutual dependency with vcr severed in 2.2.0. The package now installs and runs without pulling in the rest of the rOpenSci HTTP stack.
beautier turns R code into BEAST2 phylogenetics XML input files. The three most recent releases landed over four days in August 2025 and are all explicitly marked pre-CRAN, held back because the CRAN team was on summer holiday. The substance sits in 2.6.13, which added tip-date file handling; the two after it are lint and bug fixes.
Development is fine-grained and test-driven — releases are small, numbered in tight sequence, and reported against a fixed NEW FEATURES / MINOR IMPROVEMENTS / BUG FIXES / DEPRECATED template with 100% code coverage tracked as a line item. The recent work concentrates on validating user-supplied input files rather than expanding BEAST2 model coverage, which suggests the model surface is considered largely done and the remaining friction is in what users feed it.
The pre-CRAN backlog should be squashed into a single CRAN submission once the release window reopens; further work is most likely more input-file validation in the same check_/read_ family.
webmockr intercepts HTTP requests in R tests and returns stubbed responses, and since 1.0.0 it covers all three clients that matter — httr, httr2 and crul. The releases through 2025 have been about shedding dependencies: internal R6 classes unexported in 2.1.0, crul demoted from Imports to Suggests in the same release, and the mutual dependency with vcr severed in 2.2.0. The package now installs and runs without pulling in the rest of the rOpenSci HTTP stack.
Two arcs run in sequence. The first is coverage — multiple queued responses in 0.7.0, basic auth mocking, async through crul, then httr2 — building out what can be stubbed. The second, starting with 2.0.0, is correctness and independence: stubs are now deleted if an error occurs mid-construction rather than lingering half-built, partial matching arrives for bodies and queries, and the dependency graph is pruned release by release. The 2.2.0 split from vcr landed within a minute of crul's release taking mocking control into its own clients.
RequestPattern is documented as still exported in 2.1.0 but slated for removal, so the next major release is where that lands. Expect continued dependency pruning rather than new client support — the three clients that exist are already covered.
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either beautier or webmockr.
A tables-listings-graphs package that reached CRAN and then went quiet.
Tplyr made clinical summary tables explain where every number came from.
Clinical listings that keep inheriting their hardest problem — pagination — from the layer below.
A cache-directory helper that has shipped nothing but CRAN-triggered patches for seven years.
gigs redesigned its whole conversion API for rOpenSci, then spent three releases getting the docs to build.
A weather-data client that keeps rewriting its HTTP layer while slowly tightening its API.
See all beautier alternatives → · See all webmockr alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. beautier and webmockr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. beautier and webmockr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
Top beautier alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "beautier alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/beautier for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top webmockr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "webmockr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/webmockr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.