tidytext
Finished, widely taught, and shipping roxygen fixes.
Comparison · Analytics
bbotk vs probably
A side-by-side editorial comparison of bbotk and probably — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
bbotk vs probably: at a glance
What is bbotk?
bbotk is generalizing from an optimizer toolkit into an evaluation framework.
bbotk is the black-box optimization backend behind mlr3 tuning: search spaces, terminators, archives, and an async layer built on rush. Recent releases pair steady async-API buildout with removal of the deprecated arguments that preceded it. The 1.9.0 release introduced EvalInstance as a base class for OptimInstance, separating evaluating an objective from optimizing one.
What is probably?
The package that made calibration a step instead of an afterthought.
probably started as a small utility for class predictions and equivocal zones, and version 1.0.0 turned it into tidymodels' calibration and uncertainty package: cal_plot_*, cal_estimate_*, cal_validate_* and cal_apply across binary, multiclass and regression problems, plus conformal prediction intervals. Since then the work has been consolidation — a large internal refactor with no API change, split conformal and conformal quantile regression, bound_prediction(), and required_pkgs() and butcher methods so conformal objects can be deployed and stripped.
bbotk vs probably: editorial side-by-side
bbotk
2.5ANALYTICS
bbotk is generalizing from an optimizer toolkit into an evaluation framework.
◆ Current state
bbotk is the black-box optimization backend behind mlr3 tuning: search spaces, terminators, archives, and an async layer built on rush. Recent releases pair steady async-API buildout with removal of the deprecated arguments that preceded it. The 1.9.0 release introduced EvalInstance as a base class for OptimInstance, separating evaluating an objective from optimizing one.
◆ Where it's heading
Two threads run through the visible history. The first is async optimization maturing: ArchiveAsync gained a full push/finish/fail vocabulary over rush tasks in 1.11.0, and 1.12.0 deleted the deprecated extra arguments it replaced. The second is dependency consolidation, with custom C hypervolume code handed to moocore and rush pinned to 1.0.0, trimming maintenance surface as the async path becomes the default.
◆ Prediction
The deprecation removals in 1.12.0 suggest the async archive API is now treated as settled; the next releases most likely build on EvalInstance rather than continuing to churn ArchiveAsync.
probably
0.0ANALYTICS
The package that made calibration a step instead of an afterthought.
◆ Current state
probably started as a small utility for class predictions and equivocal zones, and version 1.0.0 turned it into tidymodels' calibration and uncertainty package: cal_plot_*, cal_estimate_*, cal_validate_* and cal_apply across binary, multiclass and regression problems, plus conformal prediction intervals. Since then the work has been consolidation — a large internal refactor with no API change, split conformal and conformal quantile regression, bound_prediction(), and required_pkgs() and butcher methods so conformal objects can be deployed and stripped.
◆ Where it's heading
The recent releases are about making these objects survive leaving the session. butcher and required_pkgs() methods are what a model needs to be pinned, containerised and served, and their arrival alongside workflows adding a tailor postprocessing stage and vetiver adding probably support points the same way: calibration is being moved out of analysis scripts and into the deployed pipeline. The cal_*_none() reference implementations are the tell that calibration is now something people tune rather than apply once.
◆ Prediction
Expect the calibration functions to be reachable directly from a tuned workflow's postprocessing stage rather than applied to predictions afterwards, following the tailor integration that workflows just shipped.
Alternatives to bbotk and probably
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either bbotk or probably.
textrecipes
Text features finally stay sparse all the way to the model.
workflowsets
workflowsets keeps widening what counts as a model worth comparing.
workflows
The tidymodels pipeline grew a third stage, and it happens after the model runs.
vetiver
Posit's MLOps package went quiet for two years, then came back to keep up with recipes.
patchwork
patchwork stopped being a ggplot composer and became a page composer.
See all bbotk alternatives → · See all probably alternatives →
Recent activity from bbotk and probably
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 24d agobbotkDeprecated extra argument removed from ArchiveAsync methods
- 1mo agobbotkArchiveAsync gains full push/finish/fail task API over rush
- 2mo agobbotkDominance and hypervolume computation moved to moocore
- 4mo agobbotkmlr_test_functions adds standard optimization benchmarks
- 5mo agobbotkEvalInstance base class separates evaluation from optimization ⚡
- 8mo agobbotkFix: conditions now work with OptimizerLocalSearch
- 10mo agoprobablyConformal objects gain required_pkgs() and butcher methods
- 1y agoprobablyggplot2 test updates and a clearer validation-set error
- 1y agoprobablyCalibration internals refactored; isotonic bootstrap bug fixed
- 2y agoprobablyFix grouping sensitivity to variable type
- 3y agoprobablySplit conformal and conformal quantile regression added
- 3y agoprobablyCalibration and conformal inference arrive in tidymodels ⚡
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between bbotk and probably?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. bbotk is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is bbotk better than probably?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. bbotk is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to bbotk?
Top bbotk alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "bbotk alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/bbotk for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to probably?
Top probably alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "probably alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/probably for the full list with editorial commentary on each.