fillpattern
Pattern fills for ggplot2, hardened against the ways users write sizes
Comparison · Analytics
bayestools vs tglkmeans
A side-by-side editorial comparison of bayestools and tglkmeans — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:r-package
bayestools vs tglkmeans: at a glance
What is bayestools?
The JAGS toolkit under RoBMA, shipping the standardization machinery its downstream rewrite needed
BayesTools provides the shared JAGS fitting, prior and summary infrastructure that the author's meta-analysis packages build on. The 0.2.x line filled in modeling primitives — prior_mixture() and mixed-posterior objects in 0.2.18, expression-valued priors and lme4-style uncorrelated random effects in 0.2.20, then a run of small diagnostic fixes for mixture and spike-and-slab priors. Version 0.3.0 in May 2026 adds automatic standardization of continuous predictors, default priors for unspecified factor and continuous terms, and functions to transform prior and posterior samples back to the original scale.
What is tglkmeans?
A k-means implementation that just told users their Spearman clustering on missing data was wrong
tglkmeans is a multi-core k-means implementation with seeding, aimed at single-cell and other large matrix workloads. Version 0.4.0 flipped the id_column default and moved to R's random number generator, 0.5.x added count-matrix downsampling and fixed id handling, and 0.6.3 in May 2026 is a correctness release: Spearman distance was ranking missing values as the largest value instead of dropping them, and predict_tgl_kmeans() with Euclidean distance did not reproduce the training metric when a cluster center had a missing dimension.
bayestools vs tglkmeans: editorial side-by-side
bayestools
0.0ANALYTICS
The JAGS toolkit under RoBMA, shipping the standardization machinery its downstream rewrite needed
◆ Current state
BayesTools provides the shared JAGS fitting, prior and summary infrastructure that the author's meta-analysis packages build on. The 0.2.x line filled in modeling primitives — prior_mixture() and mixed-posterior objects in 0.2.18, expression-valued priors and lme4-style uncorrelated random effects in 0.2.20, then a run of small diagnostic fixes for mixture and spike-and-slab priors. Version 0.3.0 in May 2026 adds automatic standardization of continuous predictors, default priors for unspecified factor and continuous terms, and functions to transform prior and posterior samples back to the original scale.
◆ Where it's heading
This package's releases are best read against what depends on them. The 0.2.x fixes track features appearing in RoBMA one version later, and 0.3.0 landed a single day before RoBMA 4.0.0 — the standardization and sample-transformation functions are the substrate that rewrite needed. The direction of the work is toward sensible defaults: default priors by predictor type, automatic standardization for sampling stability, and transformation back to interpretable scale so the convenience does not cost the user their units.
◆ Prediction
Given how tightly its releases track downstream needs, the next version is most likely driven by gaps surfacing in RoBMA 4.0.x rather than by independent feature work.
tglkmeans
0.0ANALYTICS
A k-means implementation that just told users their Spearman clustering on missing data was wrong
◆ Current state
tglkmeans is a multi-core k-means implementation with seeding, aimed at single-cell and other large matrix workloads. Version 0.4.0 flipped the id_column default and moved to R's random number generator, 0.5.x added count-matrix downsampling and fixed id handling, and 0.6.3 in May 2026 is a correctness release: Spearman distance was ranking missing values as the largest value instead of dropping them, and predict_tgl_kmeans() with Euclidean distance did not reproduce the training metric when a cluster center had a missing dimension.
◆ Where it's heading
The package handles missing data across three distance metrics, and 0.6.3 shows those paths had drifted apart — Spearman behaved unlike Euclidean and Pearson, and prediction behaved unlike training. Both fixes change results on affected data, and the release notes are careful to bound exactly where: Spearman on data with NAs changes, complete data does not. Performance work runs alongside, with the dense per-thread vote matrix removed from the reassignment step.
◆ Prediction
With the metric paths now aligned on missing-value handling, further work is more likely to target the parallel reassignment internals than the distance semantics.
Alternatives to bayestools and tglkmeans
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either bayestools or tglkmeans.
gcube
gcube's recent releases are all packaging metadata, not simulation code
cubist
The R port of Quinlan's Cubist gets reproducibility fixes, not new modelling
ggstats
ggstats keeps widening what a coefficient or Likert plot can be
ecodive
ecodive rebuilt itself into a broad diversity-metric library, breaking as it went
simStateSpace
State-space data simulation for R, filled in one function at a time
See all bayestools alternatives → · See all tglkmeans alternatives →
Recent activity from bayestools and tglkmeans
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 2mo agotglkmeansSpearman metric no longer ranks missing values as the largest
- 3mo agobayestoolsAdds automatic predictor standardization and type-based default priors
- 8mo agobayestoolsBayesTools 0.2.23
- 8mo agobayestoolsBayesTools 0.2.22
- 11mo agobayestoolsBayesTools 0.2.21
- 1y agobayestoolsBayesTools 0.2.20
- 1y agobayestoolsBayesTools 0.2.19
- 2y agotglkmeansFixes corrupted cluster ids and dropped dimnames
- 2y agotglkmeansAdds downsample_matrix() for count matrices
- 2y agotglkmeansBreaking: id_column defaults to FALSE, switches to R's RNG
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between bayestools and tglkmeans?
Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. bayestools and tglkmeans are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is bayestools better than tglkmeans?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. bayestools and tglkmeans are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to bayestools?
Top bayestools alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "bayestools alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/bayestools for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to tglkmeans?
Top tglkmeans alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "tglkmeans alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tglkmeans for the full list with editorial commentary on each.