← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

bayestools vs rphylopic

A side-by-side editorial comparison of bayestools and rphylopic — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

bayestools vs rphylopic: at a glance

Featurebayestoolsrphylopic
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesr-package, bayesian, jags, priorsphylogenetics, data-visualization, r-package, ggplot2
Last editorial update57m ago2h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is bayestools?

The JAGS toolkit under RoBMA, shipping the standardization machinery its downstream rewrite needed

BayesTools provides the shared JAGS fitting, prior and summary infrastructure that the author's meta-analysis packages build on. The 0.2.x line filled in modeling primitives — prior_mixture() and mixed-posterior objects in 0.2.18, expression-valued priors and lme4-style uncorrelated random effects in 0.2.20, then a run of small diagnostic fixes for mixture and spike-and-slab priors. Version 0.3.0 in May 2026 adds automatic standardization of continuous predictors, default priors for unspecified factor and continuous terms, and functions to transform prior and posterior samples back to the original scale.

Read the full bayestools trajectory →

What is rphylopic?

The R package that puts organism silhouettes on plots keeps widening where they can be drawn.

rphylopic fetches PhyloPic silhouettes and places them into R graphics — base plots, ggplot2 layers, legends, and now phylogenetic trees and igraph networks. The 1.x line has been consistent about two things: adding a new plotting context per release, and steadily replacing its early sizing vocabulary with explicit width and height arguments. Attribution handling is unusually developed for a package this size, with permalinks and per-image credit built into the retrieval functions.

Read the full rphylopic trajectory →

bayestools vs rphylopic: editorial side-by-side

B
bayestools
ANALYTICS
0.0

The JAGS toolkit under RoBMA, shipping the standardization machinery its downstream rewrite needed

◆ Current state

BayesTools provides the shared JAGS fitting, prior and summary infrastructure that the author's meta-analysis packages build on. The 0.2.x line filled in modeling primitives — prior_mixture() and mixed-posterior objects in 0.2.18, expression-valued priors and lme4-style uncorrelated random effects in 0.2.20, then a run of small diagnostic fixes for mixture and spike-and-slab priors. Version 0.3.0 in May 2026 adds automatic standardization of continuous predictors, default priors for unspecified factor and continuous terms, and functions to transform prior and posterior samples back to the original scale.

◆ Where it's heading

This package's releases are best read against what depends on them. The 0.2.x fixes track features appearing in RoBMA one version later, and 0.3.0 landed a single day before RoBMA 4.0.0 — the standardization and sample-transformation functions are the substrate that rewrite needed. The direction of the work is toward sensible defaults: default priors by predictor type, automatic standardization for sampling stability, and transformation back to interpretable scale so the convenience does not cost the user their units.

◆ Prediction

Given how tightly its releases track downstream needs, the next version is most likely driven by gaps surfacing in RoBMA 4.0.x rather than by independent feature work.

R
rphylopic
ANALYTICS
0.0

The R package that puts organism silhouettes on plots keeps widening where they can be drawn.

◆ Current state

rphylopic fetches PhyloPic silhouettes and places them into R graphics — base plots, ggplot2 layers, legends, and now phylogenetic trees and igraph networks. The 1.x line has been consistent about two things: adding a new plotting context per release, and steadily replacing its early sizing vocabulary with explicit width and height arguments. Attribution handling is unusually developed for a package this size, with permalinks and per-image credit built into the retrieval functions.

◆ Where it's heading

Development is expanding the set of places a silhouette can appear rather than changing what the package does. Base plots came first, then ggplot2 aesthetics and legend glyphs, then trees, then network vertices via an igraph shape registered automatically when both packages load. The other running thread is defensive maintenance against upstream churn: retries on failed API calls, fixes for ggplot2 4.0.0, and now an in-memory cache so repeated calls stop hammering the PhyloPic API. The ysize and size deprecation, opened in 1.5.0, is now complete and the arguments are scheduled for removal.

◆ Prediction

The deprecated ysize and size arguments look set to be removed in the next release, and on the pattern of the last four, another plotting context is a likelier addition than a change to the retrieval layer.

Alternatives to bayestools and rphylopic

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either bayestools or rphylopic.

See all bayestools alternatives → · See all rphylopic alternatives →

Recent activity from bayestools and rphylopic

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agorphylopicSilhouettes become igraph vertices; API responses cached
  2. 3mo agobayestoolsAdds automatic predictor standardization and type-based default priors
  3. 8mo agobayestoolsBayesTools 0.2.23
  4. 8mo agobayestoolsBayesTools 0.2.22
  5. 8mo agorphylopicBase R phylogenies gain silhouette annotation
  6. 11mo agobayestoolsBayesTools 0.2.21
  7. 1y agobayestoolsBayesTools 0.2.20
  8. 1y agobayestoolsBayesTools 0.2.19
  9. 1y agorphylopicExplicit width and height replace the old sizing arguments
  10. 2y agorphylopicSilhouette legends and attribution permalinks
  11. 2y agorphylopicSilhouette resolution helper and safer colour defaults
  12. 2y agorphylopicRendering dependencies bumped for grImport2 and rsvg

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between bayestools and rphylopic?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. bayestools and rphylopic are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is bayestools better than rphylopic?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. bayestools and rphylopic are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to bayestools?

Top bayestools alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "bayestools alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/bayestools for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to rphylopic?

Top rphylopic alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rphylopic alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rphylopic for the full list with editorial commentary on each.