← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

bayestools vs forrel

A side-by-side editorial comparison of bayestools and forrel — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

bayestools vs forrel: at a glance

Featurebayestoolsforrel
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesr-package, bayesian, jags, priorsforensic genetics, kinship analysis, simulation, parallel computing
Last editorial update1h ago1d ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is bayestools?

The JAGS toolkit under RoBMA, shipping the standardization machinery its downstream rewrite needed

BayesTools provides the shared JAGS fitting, prior and summary infrastructure that the author's meta-analysis packages build on. The 0.2.x line filled in modeling primitives — prior_mixture() and mixed-posterior objects in 0.2.18, expression-valued priors and lme4-style uncorrelated random effects in 0.2.20, then a run of small diagnostic fixes for mixture and spike-and-slab priors. Version 0.3.0 in May 2026 adds automatic standardization of continuous predictors, default priors for unspecified factor and continuous terms, and functions to transform prior and posterior samples back to the original scale.

Read the full bayestools trajectory →

What is forrel?

forrel is getting faster at the simulations forensic kinship work actually spends its time on.

forrel handles forensic pedigree analysis: kinship likelihood ratios, profile simulation, relationship checking, and missing person calculations. Version 1.9.0 synced with pedtools 2.11.0's loop handling, which the release notes credit with enabling complex pedigrees that were previously intractable, and moved profileSim() to mirai for parallelism. It also added fEstimate() for inbreeding coefficients and parentChildLikelihood() as a fast path for the simplest case.

Read the full forrel trajectory →

bayestools vs forrel: editorial side-by-side

B
bayestools
ANALYTICS
0.0

The JAGS toolkit under RoBMA, shipping the standardization machinery its downstream rewrite needed

◆ Current state

BayesTools provides the shared JAGS fitting, prior and summary infrastructure that the author's meta-analysis packages build on. The 0.2.x line filled in modeling primitives — prior_mixture() and mixed-posterior objects in 0.2.18, expression-valued priors and lme4-style uncorrelated random effects in 0.2.20, then a run of small diagnostic fixes for mixture and spike-and-slab priors. Version 0.3.0 in May 2026 adds automatic standardization of continuous predictors, default priors for unspecified factor and continuous terms, and functions to transform prior and posterior samples back to the original scale.

◆ Where it's heading

This package's releases are best read against what depends on them. The 0.2.x fixes track features appearing in RoBMA one version later, and 0.3.0 landed a single day before RoBMA 4.0.0 — the standardization and sample-transformation functions are the substrate that rewrite needed. The direction of the work is toward sensible defaults: default priors by predictor type, automatic standardization for sampling stability, and transformation back to interpretable scale so the convenience does not cost the user their units.

◆ Prediction

Given how tightly its releases track downstream needs, the next version is most likely driven by gaps surfacing in RoBMA 4.0.x rather than by independent feature work.

F
forrel
ANALYTICS
0.0

forrel is getting faster at the simulations forensic kinship work actually spends its time on.

◆ Current state

forrel handles forensic pedigree analysis: kinship likelihood ratios, profile simulation, relationship checking, and missing person calculations. Version 1.9.0 synced with pedtools 2.11.0's loop handling, which the release notes credit with enabling complex pedigrees that were previously intractable, and moved profileSim() to mirai for parallelism. It also added fEstimate() for inbreeding coefficients and parentChildLikelihood() as a fast path for the simplest case.

◆ Where it's heading

Two long threads run through the window. One is making the common operations cheap: faster simulations through reorganized likelihood calculations, a dedicated parent-child path, dropped map attribute preservation, log-likelihoods to avoid underflow in kinshipLR(). The other is making relationship checking presentable, with checkPairwise() growing ggplot2 and plotly output, verbal relationship descriptions, and bootstrap p-values. Reference data is maintained alongside both, with the FORCE SNP panel completed and an X-chromosomal counterpart added.

◆ Prediction

With profileSim() on mirai and the loop handling synced, the next likely step is extending mirai parallelism to the other simulation-heavy functions such as exclusionPower() and the bootstrap in checkPairwise().

Alternatives to bayestools and forrel

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either bayestools or forrel.

See all bayestools alternatives → · See all forrel alternatives →

Recent activity from bayestools and forrel

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agoforrelmirai parallelism and faster profile simulation
  2. 3mo agobayestoolsAdds automatic predictor standardization and type-based default priors
  3. 8mo agobayestoolsBayesTools 0.2.23
  4. 8mo agobayestoolsBayesTools 0.2.22
  5. 11mo agobayestoolsBayesTools 0.2.21
  6. 1y agobayestoolsBayesTools 0.2.20
  7. 1y agoforrelFORCE SNP panel completed and X-chromosomal set added
  8. 1y agobayestoolsBayesTools 0.2.19
  9. 1y agoforrelrankProfiles() and access to special lumping
  10. 1y agoforrelacrossComps argument and readFam() unexported
  11. 1y agoforrelcheckPairwise() overhauled with p-values and new plot backends
  12. 2y agoforrelFamilias interoperability split into pedFamilias

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between bayestools and forrel?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. bayestools and forrel are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is bayestools better than forrel?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. bayestools and forrel are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to bayestools?

Top bayestools alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "bayestools alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/bayestools for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to forrel?

Top forrel alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "forrel alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/forrel for the full list with editorial commentary on each.