← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

Apache Baremaps vs silx

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Apache Baremaps and silx — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Apache Baremaps vs silx: at a glance

FeatureApache Baremapssilx
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.05.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesgeospatial, vector-tiles, openstreetmap, apache-incubatorscientific-computing, data-visualization, synchrotron, qt
Last editorial update7d ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is Apache Baremaps?

Baremaps got geoparquet and hillshading, then went quiet for eighteen months in incubation

Apache Baremaps is a pipeline for building vector map tiles from OpenStreetMap and raster sources, still carrying the incubating designation across every release in this window. The work splits between format support and the tile-serving path: geoparquet reading arrived in 0.8.1 along with vector contours and hillshades generated from raster tiles, while 0.8.2 fixed a Postgres tile store performance issue and added a materialized-views refresher. Release notes open with the same appeal for new contributors every time, which is itself a signal about the size of the community.

Read the full Apache Baremaps trajectory →

What is silx?

silx settles into maintenance a release after its PySide6 migration

silx is in the quiet phase after a generational release. 3.1.1 is a single fix to FitWidget loading a fit function from file. The release before it, 3.1.0, was the first real feature work since the migration - asinh axis scaling, twilight colormaps, and dark-theme icons - and 3.0.1 was similarly small. The 3.0.0 cut that reset the Qt binding and Python floor still defines what the line is doing.

Read the full silx trajectory →

Apache Baremaps vs silx: editorial side-by-side

A0.0

Baremaps got geoparquet and hillshading, then went quiet for eighteen months in incubation

◆ Current state

Apache Baremaps is a pipeline for building vector map tiles from OpenStreetMap and raster sources, still carrying the incubating designation across every release in this window. The work splits between format support and the tile-serving path: geoparquet reading arrived in 0.8.1 along with vector contours and hillshades generated from raster tiles, while 0.8.2 fixed a Postgres tile store performance issue and added a materialized-views refresher. Release notes open with the same appeal for new contributors every time, which is itself a signal about the size of the community.

◆ Where it's heading

Two threads are visible. One is broadening what Baremaps can read and produce — geoparquet in, terrain-derived vector layers out — which pushes it past OSM-to-tiles toward a general geospatial pipeline. The other is making the Postgres-backed tile store hold up under load, with version-dependent query generation and materialized view refreshing suggesting real deployments hit its limits. Cadence has been slowing throughout: roughly nine months between 0.7.1 and 0.7.2, eleven to 0.8.1, then two months to 0.8.2, and nothing published since February 2025.

◆ Prediction

The entries offer no roadmap statement, and eighteen months without a release makes the incubation status the open question rather than the feature set; nothing here indicates whether graduation or dormancy is the more likely next step.

S
silx
ANALYTICS
5.0

silx settles into maintenance a release after its PySide6 migration

◆ Current state

silx is in the quiet phase after a generational release. 3.1.1 is a single fix to FitWidget loading a fit function from file. The release before it, 3.1.0, was the first real feature work since the migration - asinh axis scaling, twilight colormaps, and dark-theme icons - and 3.0.1 was similarly small. The 3.0.0 cut that reset the Qt binding and Python floor still defines what the line is doing.

◆ Where it's heading

The cadence has slowed markedly since April, and the content has shifted from structural change to plotting and colormap refinement. That is the expected shape after a binding migration: downstream beamline code needs a stable target, so the project trades feature velocity for a quiet surface. The gap between 3.0.1 in May and 3.1.0 in August is the clearest signal of the deliberate slowdown.

◆ Prediction

Expect further point releases servicing the plotting and fitting widgets rather than another structural change, with feature work continuing to arrive in the 3.1.x minors rather than patches.

Alternatives to Apache Baremaps and silx

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Apache Baremaps or silx.

See all Apache Baremaps alternatives → · See all silx alternatives →

Recent activity from Apache Baremaps and silx

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 4h agosilxFitWidget fix for loading a fit function from file
  2. 9d agosilx3.1.0: asinh axis scaling, twilight colormaps, dark-theme icons
  3. 3mo agosilx3.0.1: silx view fails to disable HDF5 file locking
  4. 3mo agosilx3.0.0: PySide6 becomes the default Qt binding, Python 3.10 required
  5. 3mo agosilx3.0.0rc1: release candidate for the PySide6 migration
  6. 1y agosilx2.2.2: plot axes limits, OpenGL axes and libhdf5 1.14 fixes
  7. 1y agoApache BaremapsBaremaps 0.8.2 fixes Postgres tile store performance
  8. 1y agoApache BaremapsBaremaps 0.8.1 adds geoparquet, contours and hillshades
  9. 2y agoApache BaremapsBaremaps 0.7.2 is release packaging and dependency upkeep
  10. 3y agoApache BaremapsBaremaps ships its first release under the Apache Foundation

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Apache Baremaps and silx?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. silx is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Apache Baremaps better than silx?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. silx is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Apache Baremaps?

Top Apache Baremaps alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Apache Baremaps alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/baremaps for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to silx?

Top silx alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "silx alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/silx for the full list with editorial commentary on each.