wooldridge
A textbook data package whose whole job is to stay installable, and whose releases prove how much work that is.
Comparison · Infra & APIs
b3doc vs projoint
A side-by-side editorial comparison of b3doc and projoint — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:r-package
b3doc vs projoint: at a glance
What is b3doc?
A small B-Cubed utility for turning R Markdown into publishable docs
b3doc converts R Markdown to Markdown and rewrites front matter for documentation published by the B-Cubed project, which is its entire remit. Three releases exist: the initial pair of functions, a generalisation of the front-matter replacement, and a hardening pass that removed regex from the replace argument and standardised figures at 300 DPI. It sits in the b-cubed-eu family alongside impIndicator and shares contributors with the wider Belgian biodiversity tooling group.
What is projoint?
projoint spent a year on CRAN paperwork, then shipped a correctness fix it flagged itself.
projoint is an R package for analysing conjoint survey experiments, covering Qualtrics import, reshaping, and quantity-of-interest estimation with inter-rater reliability correction. Most of its release history is CRAN admission work — citation formats, DESCRIPTION fields, \value{} tags, vignette cleanups — with four tags backfilled within ninety seconds of each other on 15 July in non-monotonic version order, so neither tag order nor timestamps in this feed track the real sequence. The substantive releases are the ones fixing data-preparation bugs that silently corrupt estimates.
b3doc vs projoint: editorial side-by-side
b3doc
0.0INFRA · APIS
A small B-Cubed utility for turning R Markdown into publishable docs
◆ Current state
b3doc converts R Markdown to Markdown and rewrites front matter for documentation published by the B-Cubed project, which is its entire remit. Three releases exist: the initial pair of functions, a generalisation of the front-matter replacement, and a hardening pass that removed regex from the replace argument and standardised figures at 300 DPI. It sits in the b-cubed-eu family alongside impIndicator and shares contributors with the wider Belgian biodiversity tooling group.
◆ Where it's heading
The direction is toward predictability over flexibility. The replace argument arrived in 0.2.0 generalising the earlier logo-specific behaviour, then 0.3.0 pulled regex support back out of it because escape characters and over-broad matches caused unintended edits. That is a maintainer choosing a narrower tool that fails obviously over a general one that fails quietly — a reasonable trade for a package that rewrites files in place.
◆ Prediction
Expect continued small releases driven by the documentation pipeline's needs, with output-quality defaults and front-matter handling the likely subjects rather than new functions.
projoint
2.5INFRA · APIS
projoint spent a year on CRAN paperwork, then shipped a correctness fix it flagged itself.
◆ Current state
projoint is an R package for analysing conjoint survey experiments, covering Qualtrics import, reshaping, and quantity-of-interest estimation with inter-rater reliability correction. Most of its release history is CRAN admission work — citation formats, DESCRIPTION fields, \value{} tags, vignette cleanups — with four tags backfilled within ninety seconds of each other on 15 July in non-monotonic version order, so neither tag order nor timestamps in this feed track the real sequence. The substantive releases are the ones fixing data-preparation bugs that silently corrupt estimates.
◆ Where it's heading
The maintainer is hardening the path from raw Qualtrics export to estimate, which is where conjoint analysis quietly goes wrong. Three separate releases fix that path: dropped respondent-level weights in organize_data(), repeated-task reshaping in reshape_projoint(), and choice-to-profile mapping in 1.1.3. Each fix now arrives with regression tests and stricter validation rather than just a patch, and 1.1.3 adds an explicit .choice_map so the mapping is auditable instead of inferred.
◆ Prediction
Expect the validation-and-regression-test pattern to keep extending across the import path, with releases continuing to arrive in bursts around CRAN submission rather than on a cadence.
Alternatives to b3doc and projoint
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either b3doc or projoint.
L1centrality
A graph-centrality package that spent 2026 making its existing measures usable at scale, then went quiet.
exametrika
A test-theory package that grew into a graphical-model toolkit, now spending its releases paying down the API debt that growth created.
nuggets
nuggets keeps compounding on the 2.0 rewrite — more pattern families, lighter install.
eratosthenes
eratosthenes spends 0.1.0 hardening inputs rather than adding chronology methods.
dqcheckr
dqcheckr adds drift analysis, then removes the YAML a user had to hand-write.
See all b3doc alternatives → · See all projoint alternatives →
Recent activity from b3doc and projoint
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 17d agoprojointExplicit .choice_map guards choice-to-profile mapping
- 1mo agoprojointCRAN submission housekeeping for DESCRIPTION and examples
- 1mo agoprojointCRAN formatting pass; minor make_projoint_data() fix
- 1mo agoprojointreshape_projoint() repeated-task bug fixed; validation tightened
- 1mo agoprojointCitation metadata updated with the CRAN DOI
- 4mo agob3docRegex dropped from replace; figures standardised at 300 DPI
- 5mo agoprojointorganize_data() no longer drops respondent-level weights
- 0y agob3docFront-matter replacement generalised beyond the logo
- 1y agob3docInitial release: front-matter updates and Rmd-to-Markdown conversion
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between b3doc and projoint?
Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Infra & APIs. projoint is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is b3doc better than projoint?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. projoint is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to b3doc?
Top b3doc alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "b3doc alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/b3doc for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to projoint?
Top projoint alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "projoint alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/projoint for the full list with editorial commentary on each.