qqman
The Manhattan-plot package for GWAS results, finished and dormant since 2017.
Comparison · Analytics
austraits vs timeplyr
A side-by-side editorial comparison of austraits and timeplyr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
austraits vs timeplyr: at a glance
What is austraits?
The R client for AusTraits spends its releases chasing the dataset it reads.
austraits is the R access layer for the AusTraits plant trait database, and its release history is almost entirely a record of keeping pace with two upstream systems it does not control: the austraits.build data releases and the Zenodo archive that hosts them. The most recent release adds a version-dispatch layer so the same package can read both v4.x and v5.0.0 data. Three of the four visible tags were backfilled to GitHub within 23 minutes of each other, so version order and publication order do not agree.
What is timeplyr?
timeplyr cut everything that wasn't time, then rebuilt intervals as fixed-width vectors.
timeplyr is a time-aware companion to dplyr and data.table, built around a fixed-width time_interval vector class. The 1.0.0 rewrite removed most non-time functions and pushed the C++ layer out into the separate cheapr package, leaving a narrower surface than the 0.8.x line. Releases since have been small: one feature batch in 1.1.1 and a pair of bug fixes in 1.1.2.
austraits vs timeplyr: editorial side-by-side
austraits
0.0ANALYTICS
The R client for AusTraits spends its releases chasing the dataset it reads.
◆ Current state
austraits is the R access layer for the AusTraits plant trait database, and its release history is almost entirely a record of keeping pace with two upstream systems it does not control: the austraits.build data releases and the Zenodo archive that hosts them. The most recent release adds a version-dispatch layer so the same package can read both v4.x and v5.0.0 data. Three of the four visible tags were backfilled to GitHub within 23 minutes of each other, so version order and publication order do not agree.
◆ Where it's heading
The package is converging on a stable public vocabulary and a versioned internal. Sites became locations across every join, plot and extract function; the extract_ and print family filled out at 1.0.0; and by 2.2.2 the core functions each carry a switch on the detected data version rather than assuming one schema. The visible cost of that is dependency churn — plotting packages moved to Suggests, which the notes admit can leave core functions unable to run.
◆ Prediction
Given that every release so far has been triggered by an upstream austraits.build or Zenodo change, the next one most likely follows the next data release rather than any independent roadmap. The entries do not indicate new analysis capability being planned in the client itself.
timeplyr
0.0ANALYTICS
timeplyr cut everything that wasn't time, then rebuilt intervals as fixed-width vectors.
◆ Current state
timeplyr is a time-aware companion to dplyr and data.table, built around a fixed-width time_interval vector class. The 1.0.0 rewrite removed most non-time functions and pushed the C++ layer out into the separate cheapr package, leaving a narrower surface than the 0.8.x line. Releases since have been small: one feature batch in 1.1.1 and a pair of bug fixes in 1.1.2.
◆ Where it's heading
The arc is consolidation, not expansion. Each release since 1.0.0 trims arguments, renames functions toward a single vocabulary (width, timespan, grid), or fixes an interaction with data.table's own rolling functions. The package increasingly acts as a thin time layer over cheapr and data.table rather than carrying its own implementation.
◆ Prediction
Expect continued small releases tracking cheapr and data.table changes rather than new function families; the entries show no in-progress feature work beyond the ggplot2-friendly breakpoint helpers introduced in 1.1.1.
Alternatives to austraits and timeplyr
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either austraits or timeplyr.
constants
The R package for CODATA constants rebuilt its symbol table on NIST's naming so future updates stop being hand work.
ggdemetra
A ggplot2 layer for seasonal adjustment output, filling in one plot type at a time.
fossilsim
A fossil-record simulator that quietly grew a trait-evolution engine.
tern.rbmi
Reference-based multiple imputation tables, shipping only what CRAN checks demand.
tern.mmrm
An MMRM tabulation package that has published nothing since its 2024 CRAN releases.
See all austraits alternatives → · See all timeplyr alternatives →
Recent activity from austraits and timeplyr
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 4mo agotimeplyrLeap-day and time_complete(.by=) bug fixes
- 10mo agotimeplyrtime_breakpoints added; rolling calcs realigned to data.table
- 1y agotimeplyrFixed-width time intervals; non-time functions removed ⚡
- 1y agotimeplyrtime_intervals on by default; year_month/year_quarter ggplot2 scales
- 2y agotimeplyrRegression fixes after the 0.8.0 refactor
- 2y agotimeplyrC++ layer moved to cheapr; time_interval class introduced
- 2y agoaustraitsSupport for AusTraits 5.0.0 data and the rebuilt Zenodo API
- 3y agoaustraitsextract_taxa, lookup_trait and print methods arrive
- 3y agoaustraitsVignette build and extract_ function polish
- 3y agoaustraitssite becomes location across the API; AusTraits 3.0.2+ support
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between austraits and timeplyr?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. austraits and timeplyr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is austraits better than timeplyr?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. austraits and timeplyr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to austraits?
Top austraits alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "austraits alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/austraits-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to timeplyr?
Top timeplyr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "timeplyr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/timeplyr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.