rjd3highfreq
rjd3highfreq ships whatever the Java side ships, and only occasionally says what that was.
Comparison · Analytics
audubon vs rstatix
A side-by-side editorial comparison of audubon and rstatix — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
audubon vs rstatix: at a glance
What is audubon?
audubon's release feed is almost entirely Renovate bumping the JavaScript toolchain behind its Japanese text splitter.
An R package for Japanese text processing — normalisation, tokenisation via MeCab and SudachiPy, and phrase splitting through budoux. Ten releases since 2022, but the changelogs are dominated by automated dependency updates to a webpack, babel and prettier toolchain, because the budoux component is JavaScript that has to be bundled. Actual R-facing changes appear in perhaps one release in three.
What is rstatix?
rstatix hit 1.0 by unrounding every p-value it has ever returned
rstatix is the pipe-friendly test wrapper behind most ggpubr annotation workflows — t-tests, Wilcoxon, ANOVA, post-hoc comparisons, effect sizes, all returning tidy data frames. After three quiet years of CRAN-compat patching, it shipped 1.0.0 and 1.1.0 three weeks apart in mid-2026. Both releases push in the same direction: interval estimates and full-precision output for numbers the package previously rounded or omitted.
audubon vs rstatix: editorial side-by-side
audubon
0.0ANALYTICS
audubon's release feed is almost entirely Renovate bumping the JavaScript toolchain behind its Japanese text splitter.
◆ Current state
An R package for Japanese text processing — normalisation, tokenisation via MeCab and SudachiPy, and phrase splitting through budoux. Ten releases since 2022, but the changelogs are dominated by automated dependency updates to a webpack, babel and prettier toolchain, because the budoux component is JavaScript that has to be bundled. Actual R-facing changes appear in perhaps one release in three.
◆ Where it's heading
The package appears feature-stable and in maintenance. The last substantive R-level addition visible here is bind_lr() for bigram LR values back in 0.5.0; everything since has been dependency hygiene, a tokeniser refactor, and platform-specific test fixes. That is a reasonable end state for a wrapper whose value is the binding rather than ongoing invention, but it does mean the release feed carries almost no signal about the package itself — a reader watching this feed would learn more about webpack's version history than about Japanese text processing.
◆ Prediction
Expect the Renovate cadence to continue setting the release rhythm, with R-facing changes arriving only when budoux itself gains capability or a platform breaks.
rstatix
2.5ANALYTICS
rstatix hit 1.0 by unrounding every p-value it has ever returned
◆ Current state
rstatix is the pipe-friendly test wrapper behind most ggpubr annotation workflows — t-tests, Wilcoxon, ANOVA, post-hoc comparisons, effect sizes, all returning tidy data frames. After three quiet years of CRAN-compat patching, it shipped 1.0.0 and 1.1.0 three weeks apart in mid-2026. Both releases push in the same direction: interval estimates and full-precision output for numbers the package previously rounded or omitted.
◆ Where it's heading
The work is about matching what dedicated effect-size packages give you without taking on their dependencies. Confidence intervals for partial eta squared and for Cohen's d are both computed in base R from noncentral distributions and both check against effectsize; compact letter displays are computed in base R against multcompView. The pattern is deliberate — reproduce the reference implementation, add no imports. Alongside that, the package has started correcting statistical hygiene it got wrong for years, most visibly by no longer rounding p-values before adjusting them.
◆ Prediction
The analytic-interval machinery now exists for eta squared and Cohen's d; the untouched effect sizes in the package — eta squared for nonparametric tests, Cramer's V, rank-biserial correlation — are the obvious next targets for the same base-R noncentral treatment.
Alternatives to audubon and rstatix
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either audubon or rstatix.
affiner
affiner is quietly turning a grid transformation helper into a small computational geometry library.
ageproR
ageproR spent two years chasing a moving file format, then added the recruitment models that justify the effort.
r-ledger
ledger adds a Rust toolchain fallback, so beancount imports work whether or not the Python tooling is installed.
gridpattern
gridpattern keeps widening its catalogue, and the newest patterns finally use the device's own line rendering.
distributional
distributional taught + and - to work on any pair of distributions, closing the algebra it started with.
See all audubon alternatives → · See all rstatix alternatives →
Recent activity from audubon and rstatix
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 22d agorstatixrstatix 1.1.0 gives Cohen's d a deterministic confidence interval
- 1mo agorstatixrstatix 1.0.0 stops rounding p-values before adjusting them ⚡
- 3mo agoaudubonM1 Mac locale crash worked around in examples
- 7mo agoaudubonaudubon 0.6.2
- 7mo agoaudubonAutomated dependency bumps, including a webpack security update
- 9mo agorstatixrstatix 0.7.3
- 2y agoaudubonbudoux bumped to 0.6.2; Renovate configured
- 3y agoaudubonMeCab and SudachiPy tokenisers refactored
- 3y agoaudubonbind_lr() computes LR values for bigrams
- 3y agorstatixrstatix 0.7.2
- 3y agorstatixrstatix 0.7.1
- 5y agorstatixrstatix 0.7.0
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between audubon and rstatix?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. rstatix is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is audubon better than rstatix?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. rstatix is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to audubon?
Top audubon alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "audubon alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/audubon-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to rstatix?
Top rstatix alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rstatix alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rstatix for the full list with editorial commentary on each.